Hi,
I wrote a little equal height plugin.
Now, say I have two pairs of divs on a page, and I want the divs
having the same class to have the same height. My function call would
look something like this:
$('.classOne, .classTwo').equalHeight();
At them moment the plugin looks like this:
(functi
crossing whatever variables may hold
> the same name in another context thus risking them being
> overwritten by some
> other script, but I want them to be part of the anonymous
> function's context
> when it is called.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Michel B
Hi,
I'm trying to use a jQuery statement inside a setTimeout function, but
I don't get it to work. I tried a lot of variants, like this one (I'm
using 'this' because the setTimeout is inside an each function, and
the selector is cached/stored in an object, thus the $selector):
setTimeout("" + thi
achedSelector.removeAttr('disabled');
>
> work as expected?
>
> On Nov 1, 11:42 pm, north wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I usually cache jquery objects in variables or a config object.
>
> > Lately I ran into a strange issue with that when trying to do this:
&
Hi,
I usually cache jquery objects in variables or a config object.
Lately I ran into a strange issue with that when trying to do this:
$myCachedSelector.attr('disabled', false);
The selected object simply remained to be disabled.
When I used the normal syntax $('#mySelector').attr('disabled',
Inside $(document).ready(function(), yes... But the link I posted
describes the problem I had, and the workaround seems to do its
job. :)
On 19 Aug., 09:17, Giovanni Battista Lenoci wrote:
> north ha scritto:> I found the issue. It's described here for example
I found the issue. It's described here for example:
http://csharperimage.jeremylikness.com/2009/05/jquery-ie6-and-could-not-set-selected.html
On 18 Aug., 18:09, north wrote:
> Nobody any clue why "$('#mySelect option[value="' + myValue +
> '"]&#x
Nobody any clue why "$('#mySelect option[value="' + myValue +
'"]').attr('selected', 'selected');" of code is throwing an error?
On 18 Aug., 16:32, north wrote:
> Hi Giovanni,
>
> this seems to work as well. But somehow
Hi Giovanni,
this seems to work as well. But somehow I'm getting the same error
(just connected to another line of code).
Mabye I'll have to tear the whole script apart and start over... :)
Cheers
On 18 Aug., 16:16, Giovanni Battista Lenoci wrote:
> north ha scritto:> $(&
Hi,
I'm trying set an option with a certain value to selected. I'm using
this:
$('#mySelect option[value="' + myValue + '"]').attr('selected',
'selected');
This has worked in another piece of code I wrote, but now IE 6 and 8
are throwing an error (in the debug bar). It's something similar to
th
ount of all browsers to fill in the hidden inputs when the
> user clicks the back button. In your place, I'd seriously consider
> switching the form submission to AJAX. If you still want the user to
> be able to go back with a back button, you could use deeplinking.
>
> 2009/8
I have to add that my colleague who coded the old version of this page
used Sajax and "vanilla" JS, and his page works in all tested
browsers. So I thought doing the same with jQuery should be as easy as
it gets... :)
On 17 Aug., 19:22, north wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a page wi
Hi,
I have a page with a simple form: 3 hidden fields and 3 selects.
I load the data for the first select via Ajax on domready. I have
"change" event handlers for all 3 fields. If I select something in the
first select, the corresponding data gets loaded into the second
select via Ajax etc. So i
Hi,
I have build a quite complex widget which contains "some kind of
form". It has a form tag, but I'm loading a lot of stuff in there via
Ajax etc. Cannot explain it in detail, and the code is too long to
paste in here.
Now, in a "live('click', function()" I use for one of the form fields,
I'm
is causing an unknown error, which isn't an ideal
> thing to debug. :P
>
> Using jQuery to backload any additional plugins or scripts can be
> super useful, but including the jQuery library asynchronously seems
> like a poor decision.
>
> On Aug 6, 4:12 am, north wr
Hi all,
I played around with Steve Souders' techniques of loading JS without
blocking a bit (I had already been using jQuery's getScript/ajax to
load bigger chunks of code for certain parts of the site only if
necessary).
I tried to use what Nicolas Zakas calls "the best way to load
JS" (http://w
Hi, I didn't check your code, but when you write "current value" and
"old value" I supposed you change those dynamically. In that you
should take a look at this:
http://docs.jquery.com/Events/live
Cheers
On 27 Jul., 05:49, JC wrote:
> Now, I was not expecting this. You can get the text inside
Hi,
I just created a little widget using jQuery. The code is kinda ugly,
but I'm trying to improve it at least a bit. The first thing I wanted
to do was to cache the jQuery objects. In this case I created global
variables for this.
Besides the global variables, I have a couple of functions using
Hi,
is it better to do this (regarding performance not readability):
$('a.updateCartButton').click(function() {
$('form[name=updateCartForm]').attr('action', $(this).attr('href')+'#'+
$('img[id^=iconUpdateArticle]').attr('id')).submit();
return false;
});
or this:
$('a.updateCartButton').click
Hi,
the other day I read this article by Alan Storm called "Using jQuery
and the Object Literal Singleton/Module Pattern" (http://alanstorm.com/
jquery_object_literal_oop), as well as the interesting appendix
chapter "JavaScript that you need to know but might not!" (you can
find a nice article o
Hi,
I guess most of you are aware of the peformance tip: put JavaScript at
the bottom of the page.
Now, what I have seen on quite a few pages is that the jquery.js is
placed in the header, and a file with all the code inside $
(document).ready somewhere before the tag.
What are the benefits of
Hi,
I just tested all my jQuery selectors using the jQuery Tester (http://
jquery.nodnod.net), and the results seem to "contradict" one thing I
read in a performance article: that you should descend from the
closest parent ID when using classes in your selector (the article
says "April 09", so th
Hi,
yesterday I read an article about jQuery performance. In one part the
author talks about selectors and uses
.nav li a
as an example. He states that before jQuery 1.3., the selector
ul.nav a
would have been the best way to get all links in the list. In jQuery
1.3., due to the inclusion of
23 matches
Mail list logo
