Hi, no responses to this, so thought I'd reply to put it in front of
people again. Perhaps an item for the jquery dev list?
thanks,
-Morgan
On Jun 10, 4:57 pm, morgancodes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting inconsistant results across browsers with the following
> test:
>
Hello,
I'm getting inconsistant results across browsers with the following
test:
test.html ===
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>
http://ajax.googleapis.com/
ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/jquery.min.js">
var xml;
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "data.xml",
Hello,
I'm trying to squeeze out every last bit of performance I can from
IE6, and want to make sure there isn't a faster way than what I'm
doing.
I'm doing about 180 iterations of somethig like the following
parentElem = $("parentTable");
for(var i = 0; i<400; i++){
$(tableRowHTML[i]).appen
Cool. Thanks for the ticket.
On Feb 23, 7:03 pm, Dave Methvin wrote:
> If the object has a length property, it is assumed to be Array-like.
> There are several Objects that have Array-like behavior, like jQuery
> objects, DOM NodeList objects, and Function.arguments.
>
> In this case, you've spe
Hello,
It seems that it's not safe to use "length" as a nested object
property if I want to use jquery.extend. Is this a know issue?
$.extend(true, {},{"prop":{"length":"-1"}});
thanks,
-Morgan
5 matches
Mail list logo