Hi all,
I've recently released a mock library for the jqUnit framework.
It is intended to be a lightweight javascript Mock Framework, and allows
dependent functions such as native alert dialogs to be mocked and tested in
isolation.
I hope this library can be useful for real life usage. Please
So excited to see that you are actively working on this John! :-)
I can see you've been concentrating on document parsing behavior, while I've
just been looking at "automated testing in rhino". From my testing
perspective, I made a couple of patches:
- in test(), wrapping fn() and the next lines
I was thinking about modifying testrunner.js (the rhino version) with jqUnit,
and getting it run to a point where it will be compatible with the latest
QUnit and jqUnit test framework.
before I dive in, has anyone done any work on this they'd be able to share,
so I won't be reinventing the wheel
thanks for the post. i love the idea of having tests in the same module using
the same setup and teardown, great idea.
Noticed a glitch though. You'll need to call jqUnit.module(this.moduleName)
just before jqUnit.test().
Otherwise, you end up with whatever module name was last called, and not t
More of a general JS questions for all the JS gurus who listen to this forum!
I am posting a form into a hidden iframe:
...
Is there an easy way to tell that the iframe has been loaded (e.g. some
event that gets fired) ?
I am able to poll the frame, catch the cross domain permission excep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Remember that variables declared within functions only exist for that
> function.
>
Not really...
As others mentioned, the crux of the problem is because setInterval is
calling "force()" which refers to the global scope.
Try passing in the reference to the fun
Not sure if this is what you mean, but I can load external JS using a
bookmarklet.
For example, loading jquery onto any arbitary web page:
javascript:var
s=document.createElement('script');s.type='text/javascript';s.src='http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/files/jquery-1.1.4.js';document.body.appendC
I can confirm that this is the case, on a WindowsXP machine with IE7
installed, I have the same userAgent string, so get the same result.
There is no problem with my Windows Vista IE7 because the userAgent string
is different.
NetHawk wrote:
>
>
> Don't know, if this has been observed by any
I was wondering if anyone could tell me why firefox still runs the scripts,
even though they are not explicitly evaluated... the appendChild by itself
seems to be enough to get firefox to run inline scripts which are not on the
top level.
Jim Marion wrote:
>
>
> The eval is in the domManip. I
9 matches
Mail list logo
