I don't know if this is still a problem for you, but I believe your
invocation of the "containment" parameter is wrong. If I'm reading
the documentation right, "containment" expects the literal value
"parent", not whatever the parent's id is.
With that said, I can't actually get containment to w
Well, I have at least a partial solution. I'm still having serious
problems with containment, but without containment, if I position the
elements in question, it seems to work correctly (except, of course,
that you can move items from one sortable to the other).
On your "without containment" pag
link to it. What's up with that?
On May 11, 3:08 pm, bhagany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After I posted, I realized that first paragraph is a little
> outdated... so disregard the stuff that doesn't seem to make sense.
>
> On May 11, 3:05 pm, bhagany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After I posted, I realized that first paragraph is a little
outdated... so disregard the stuff that doesn't seem to make sense.
On May 11, 3:05 pm, bhagany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I've been fooling around with this all day, and I think I have
> narrowed down th
MAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the divs, u should look into divs position, position them absolutely,
> or add another div with a strict size which doesn't slide, because on
> relative position when it slides - it's height or width changes, so
> the previous div gets into plac
I've spent awhile searching for a solution in the archives, but have
been unable to find one, so I finally bit the bullet and joined the
group to ask about it.
Here's the situation: I've got two divs, one starts out set to
display:none, the other is display:block. When a link is clicked, I
want
6 matches
Mail list logo
