Bah, of course the other way 'round. Thanks.
- T.J.
On Jan 14, 2:45 pm, MorningZ wrote:
> Loop through the data, not the inputs
>
> so like:
>
> $.each(data, function(k, v) {
> var txt = document.getElementById(k);
> if (txt) {
> $(this)
t:text").each(function(){
part = $(this).attr("id");
$(this).val(data.part);
});
}
but that obviously doesn't work, since it's trying to retrieve "part"
from the data object, instead of using the variable's value. Does
anyone have a way of doing this?
Thanks.
-- T.J.
Office:
Save
and I'm using var data = $("#details").serialize(); to serialize the
data.
Thanks.
-- T.J.
You know, I didn't even realize there was two differing sets of
documentation; that would explain why I was confused as to the
multitude of arguments passed when the documentation listed only one.
I appreciate the help; you guys cleared that up for me.
Thanks.
-- T.J.
On Dec 30, 4:04 pm,
things, I just wasn't seeing the why; now I do.
Thanks for the help. Makes a lot more sense now.
-- T.J.
On Dec 30, 12:21 pm, MorningZ wrote:
> oops.. that should say:
>
> "the third: $.extend(obj2, obj3);"
why. I've read the documentation for $.extend and it doesn't seem
to make much sense with the way it's used within that walkthrough, at
least not to me.
Is anyone able to put it in a more understandable way, other than what
the documentation has?
Thanks,
T.J.
When you use + like you are there, it's trying to add your string to
something.. which isn't a number, hence NaN. Could you not do ppost :
{ 'Path' : $FilePath, 'File' : $FileName } ? That would be my
suggestion.
-- T.J.
On Dec 22, 1:58 pm, Adrian Maleska wrot
I'd provide more detail; $.ajax should work in every browser. There's
more than likely an issue with the script or the response. An example
of what you're doing would work wonders for helping us figure it out.
- T.J.
On Dec 22, 7:45 am, kumari Manohar wrote:
> Remove
>
>
THING, just use .unbind();
otherwise if you want to unbind a click binding, use .unbind("click");
You only need to pass a function if you want to unbind the bound event
that calls on that function.
- T.J.
On Dec 15, 4:11 pm, "laredotorn...@zipmail.com"
wrote:
> I saw thi
Try $("#id").unbind("click");
I've never used it before, but according to
http://docs.jquery.com/Events/unbind#typefn
that oughta do the job pretty nicely.
- T.J.
On Dec 15, 3:38 pm, "laredotorn...@zipmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using JQue
hat I
need right now. Perhaps someone will point me to a better way of doing
this in the future.
- T.J.
On Dec 15, 11:30 am, "T.J. Simmons" wrote:
> Well that's certainly one thought. :)
>
> Luis, to unsubscribe to gohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en,
> Edit my M
legroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] En nombre
> de T.J. Simmons
> Enviado el: martes, 15 de diciembre de 2009 12:02
> Para: jQuery (English)
> Asunto: [jQuery] Plugin Questions
>
> Hi all,
>
> Got a question for you guys who're more knowledgeable than I am. I
>
t").css("background-color") ==
'yellow') {
$("#trafficLight").css("background-color", "red");
} else {
$("#trafficLight").css("background-color", "green");
}
});
That should do it for you.
(function
($) { closure? Since script tags mingle together once they're loaded
on the page, I assume that would work. Any thoughts or suggestions
here would be greatly appreciated. Here's a link to the plugin code:
http://jsbin.com/aweso3/edit
It's in the Javascript tab.. I've commented the area I'm curious
about.
Thanks!
- T.J.
Appreciate it. My digging around online brought up old posts from 2007-
ish, so I wasn't sure if this was just due to the implementation
across different browsers or an actual bug. Thanks.
T.J. Simmons
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Dave Methvin
wrote:
For some r
That's the part that had me a little confused, that it's showing up at
all; as far as I can tell, the way .append() is used is correct. A
page, like Mike said, that shows what you're using and the context in
which you're using it would definitely go a long way towards figur
who knows more will come in and blast my answer, but
that's my thought.
Hope that helps.
- T.J.
On Dec 14, 10:05 am, joseph7 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, I'm attempting to add HTML to a document via Ajax, but when I get
> back the content, I'm finding that no matter what I t
if (a != b) {
alert('Thing! Please fix.');
$(this).focus();
}
});
where a and b are my two controls, and the alert is an actual error
message. I'm trying to set the focus back to the text box () if it doesn't match, and this only works
in IE.
Thanks,
T.J.
So it works now? Glad to hear. Let us know if you need anything else.
- T.J.
On Dec 11, 10:44 am, youradds wrote:
> haha think I may have worked it out :p
>
> Was missing this in the last one:
>
> jQuery("#catid3").html(options);
>
Aye, must be something else on the page; I've never tried using the
text of the option, good to know it works like that too.
- T.J.
On Dec 11, 10:27 am, Scott Sauyet wrote:
> And your other syntax should also work as well:
>
> http://jsbin.com/oredo(codehttp://jsbin.com/oredo/
Have you tried putting the numeric value in quotes? It works fine like
that.. here's a link so you can see.
http://jsbin.com/iqiru
Hope that helps.
- T.J.
On Dec 11, 9:59 am, youradds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to make a bit of code, which will auto-select a value from
&
Back at work, and it works like a charm. Thanks very much.
- T.J.
On Dec 10, 12:41 pm, "T.J. Simmons" wrote:
> Well the other errors don't exist in my live code; I just typed up the
> page on jsbin real quick before a meeting to show what my problem was.
> I ap
not the best at traversing; haven't
used .prev() before.
Thanks!
T.J. Simmons
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Scott Sauyet
wrote:
On Dec 10, 12:36 pm, "T.J. Simmons" wrote:
Sorry, the right link ishttp://jsbin.com/ekuyo
It would probably be better to fix t
Even fixed my code to traverse is wrong somehow; that's the core of
the issue. The code in the example page was more to show the body of
the problem, but I'll get that fixed when I return from lunch.
Thanks.
T.J. Simmons
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:19 PM, "Ma
Sorry, the right link is http://jsbin.com/ekuyo
On Dec 10, 11:32 am, "T.J. Simmons" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pretty bad at DOM traversing (can't get hierarchies right in my
> head, I guess) and I'm in a situation where it's basically my only
> option
basic formula of MID: and the following div being able to be
repeated many times.
What I'm trying to do is go into everything with a class of thingS,
and go to the hdnMID before it to get the value.
And it's giving me 'undefined' as the value I'm getting.
Any help please?
Thanks,
T.J.
I'll do the same.
Thanks!
T.J.
On Dec 9, 4:45 pm, kingunderscore wrote:
> Yeah these things happen oh well.
>
> T.J.
> I will let you know if i find a more graceful way around it.
>
> Thanks for the help!
> Michel Belleville
>
> And in reference to your question
then i pull the .html() from that and then wipe it
> out again after i get what i need.
>
> On Dec 9, 1:57 pm, "T.J. Simmons" wrote:
>
>
>
> > It needs a root element, that's what I just ran into an issue with
> > (I'm trying something v
No problem, glad to help.
-T.J.
On Dec 9, 1:12 pm, Cameron van den Bergh
wrote:
> Thank you for this information, indeed, i was using $.get.
>
> On 9 déc, 18:13, "T.J. Simmons" wrote:
>
>
>
> > Are you using $.ajax or one of the other AJAX functions? $.g
It needs a root element, that's what I just ran into an issue with
(I'm trying something very similar).
However, for some reason IE returns null when you try to get the
information inside of the tag, but Firefox (and Chrome and Safari)
return the correct information.
Have you seen that before?
O
Haha, no problem. I've been having one of those weeks. Glad it works.
-T.J.
On Dec 9, 11:42 am, rob wrote:
> Nevermind... I found the error... I'm having one of those mornings...
> Thanks for you help tho
>
> On Dec 9, 10:30 am, rob wrote:
>
>
>
> > I switc
. see what you're getting and do a
replace on all possible combos, that's my thought.
Hope that helps.
T.J.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mad-Halfling wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions folks, I tried
> var $html = $("#DivID").html();
> $("br", $html).r
which seems to have fixed a good deal of the problems.
Thanks,
T.J.
On Dec 9, 11:14 am, Cameron van den Bergh
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To improve efficiency, try using contexts in order to restrict the
> parsed DOM elements.
>
> For example, if you know that all targeted elemen
Are you using $.ajax or one of the other AJAX functions? $.get and the
rest only execute a callback upon success; you'll need to use $.ajax
if you want a callback for an error.
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.get#urldatacallbacktype has some
more information on that.
-T.J.
On Dec 9, 6:
w.
Thanks.
T.J.
On Dec 9, 10:02 am, "T.J." wrote:
> I just ran a page with an absurd amount of inputs through the Firebug
> profiler and it seems that the majority of the time spent running
> scripts is inside jQuery's (I'm using 1.4a1) Sizzle selector, which
&
I guess that just depends on whether or not the .html() is treated as
a string or as an object with HTML elements. If it's a straight up
string, .replace like you said would work just fine. If it's a
collection of HTML elements, the jQuery method should work.
Again, I'm just fumbling around here,
Reading through the documentation, it seems that either would work, if
you provide a selector...
Try something like..
var $html = $("#DivID").html();
$("br", $html).replaceWith("\r\n");
could maybe work? I'm no expert on this at all, that's just my initial
thought.
On Dec 9, 9:49 am, Mad-Halfli
tee is the case).
Again,
thanks.
T.J.
On Dec 9, 9:43 am, "T.J." wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wrote a suggestion plugin to make suggestions as the user types, and
> display a tooltip if they mouse over the suggestion. This is my first
> jQuery plugin and I followed t
is any suggestions on how to improve the performance
of it. If anyone has any ideas of where I could place the file, please
let me know.
Thank you.
T.J.
page.
Thanks!
T.J.
On Dec 9, 8:56 am, "T.J." wrote:
> Thanks for the link; I haven't heard of that site before.
>
> http://jsbin.com/axuwi3is my (very basic) example of what I'm trying
> to attempt. What the button on my page actually does is quite
> differen
uot; wrote:
> Could you share a live sample page? If you don't have a place to host one,
> jsbin.com:
>
> http://jsbin.com/
>
> That will allows us to see what you're seeing quite easily.
>
> - Richard
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM, T.J. wr
For further clarification, the way I'm calling that is as follows:
for (var x = 1; x <= count; x++) {
$("#button").triggerHandler("click");
}
which is inside of a function that I call on page load, and it isn't
working at all.
Thanks,
T.J.
On Dec 8, 1:32 p
This is somewhere in the jQuery documentation, but use .live("click",
function(){
instead of .click(function(){
to delegate the function to all matched elements on the page and
loaded in via AJAX or otherwise.
Hope that helps.
T.J. Simmons
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 8, 2009,
ger/.triggerHandler methods
not be called from within a loop? The syntax I'm using is as follows:
$("#button").triggerHandler("click");
Thanks,
T.J.
gree,
they don't all have to be globals. JavaScript provides very powerful
OOP features in the form of prototypical inheritance. You can also
simulate class-based inheritance if you like, although JavaScript is
not class-oriented; it's that flexible. :-)
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj /
Query.fn.switchClass = function(class1,class2) {
if (this.hasClass(class1)) {
this.removeClass(class1).addClass(class2);
} else {
this.removeClass(class2).addClass(class1);
}
};
[1] http://blog.niftysnippets.org/2008/03/horror-of-implicit-globals.html
FWIW,
--
T.J. Cr
(Sorry, premature click-itis.) I should have said that you would
initiate the jQuery.ajax post from a submit handler on the form,
passing the form data in as the 'data' parameter, and cancel the
standard form submit (since that would refresh the entire page).
-- T.J. :-)
On Mar 2
use jQuery.post
[2] which is a simplified wrapper for it, but .post is missing out
some important things IMHO, like a callback on failure.)
[1] http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.ajax#options
[2] http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.post#urldatacallbacktype
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
ering
up the global namespace. ;-)
No, seriously, as I said to the OP, you'd want to wrap this up into
some kind of module or class...
-- T.J. :-)
On Mar 22, 11:10 pm, mkmanning wrote:
> Sorry, I should have written:
>
> var div = $('div.img1')[0], //get with whatever se
oing this for myself (which isn't likely), I'd
probably use numbered styles like you did -- that approach makes more
sense to me. It's just that after your earlier post, the OP expressly
asked for an array-based approach...
-- T.J. :-)
On Mar 22, 7:50 pm, mkmanning wrote:
> A
tDefault();
}
});
(You'll need to add in your animate logic, etc.)
HTH, and apologies if I'm misreading.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 22, 2:28 pm, mike wrote:
> folks, I am trying to puzzle something
* *
You would probably want to generalize that into a reusable module of
some kind, but the logic is simple enough.
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting s
bgiframe
[3] http://www.google.com/search?q=iframe+site%3Adocs.jquery.com
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 21, 12:03 pm, "sandee...@adpsconsulting.com"
wrote:
> The problem in brief :-
> In simple
text (no pun!) we can probably figure it out, if
the above isn't helpful.
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 19, 1:20 pm, Martin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Hi Ricardo,
My guess is that he's using multiple class names and that's why it
wasn't working originally (false positives); see my post a couple
back.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 19, 12:54 am, ric
.6 code doesn't quite work in 1.3?
HTH, sorry for missing != support earlier.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 18, 10:59 am, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a != attribute operator?
.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors
[3] http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3
[4] http://wiki.github.com/jeresig/sizzle
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 18, 10:21 am, will wrote
@brian, @mkmanning: FWIW, looked to me from his example like he
really did mean hash (what some use as a synonym for the anchor
portion of the URI), not query string. Perhaps he's doing some
history stuff...
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consu
;properties". Don't get me started on the
horror of implicit globals.[1] ;-)
[1] http://blog.niftysnippets.org/2008/03/horror-of-implicit-globals.html
-- T.J.
On Mar 15, 5:00 pm, mkmanning wrote:
> Not sure what you mean "inline" or by "scope the vars inside";
> variables decl
See the reply in your duplicate thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/6366e26a7727a81d
On Mar 15, 12:50 pm, lovespring wrote:
> (function(){})();
> what's the first () means? is this a standard grammar?and why coding
> like this?
the containing scope.
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
61 matches
Mail list logo
