http://www.blazewebstudio.co.za/Network_2/index.html please help me with the
j-query problems on the top horizontal and the side vertical accordion, it
bounces and the overflow is out of whack. Also the menu is sometimes strange
if you go over it too fast, I Know too many problems but please help
Help Jquery I Have Customized The Following Menu To Suit My Purposes, How Do
I Make The Effect Mouseover Instead Of On-click And It Must Not Bounce Or
Overflow. Http://bit.ly/FceQ9?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-with-jquey-accordian-tp27340367s27240p27340367.html
Se
In 1.4 the built in live() function has been heavily extended, so
perhaps you can switch to using that instead?
On Jan 15, 12:35 am, Jon Bennett wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've been using LiveQuery a fair bit in my projects, I've just tried
> updating to 1.4, and it appears to have broken it.
> Thishttp:/
I think I should point out that you can't have more than one element
with the same ID, they are by definition unique. The reason is that
the getElementById method depends on there being only one item with
the ID passed to it in the DOM. If there is more than one item then
behaviour is undefined.
If you're using the Metadata plugin and inline rules:
I've not actually tested it but it should work.
On Oct 11, 4:37 am, Phper wrote:
> There are two input fields in a form, but only one of them is
> required, they are not required at the same time. Either A or B is
> required. ( A is requi
Sorry, incorrect title
I've been struggling with this for a couple of days now. I'm building
pages with tables containing checkboxes. Each row of the table
represents a grouping of checkboxes, The rows are generated in a PHP
loop and have the format:
So a small table with 3 rows and 3 checkboxes would go:
[1][1],
I'm working on a survey builder that lets people generate web forms
for collecting user data. Form builders can create forms with various
controls on them.
At the moment I'm building in a jQuery validate layer (there is also a
server side validation layer, but I want to keep users from making
un
I am trying to create something like this:
http://i27.tinypic.com/29p3woi.jpg
The text would be a tag or something similar. The progress
buttons don't have to be the dots I can use floated next and previous
arrows.
Is this doable using jQuery Slideshow or Cycle, preferably Cycle since
it seems
Your best bet in that case is trying to talk your client out of it
then. XML is not a very efficient format for data and a file
containing effectively the entire database is only ever going to be
huge and unwieldy. If you're processing it in a browser it's simply
going to be slow, there's no gett
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Gordon wrote:
>
> > Sorry, my mistake. We originally rolled out with 1.5.1 and then
> > upgraded to 1.5.2 today when the error came to light. Doing so didn't
> > fix the problem.
>
> > On May 20, 12:31 pm, Jörn Zaefferer
&g
says 1.5.2. Please make sure you are really using
> 1.5.2!
>
> Jörn
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Gordon wrote:
>
> > We recently did an update on our website,http://www.equanet.co.uk
> > with a design refresh and an update to the library of javascript. We
&g
We recently did an update on our website, http://www.equanet.co.uk
with a design refresh and an update to the library of javascript. We
upgraded jQuery to 1.3.2, the validator to 1.5.1 and various other
libraries and plugins to their latest version.
Doing this seems to have broken the validator,
I'm adding a feature to a table where it can have a compact r a
verbose display. When in compact mode a class is added to the table
causing various various elements in the table cells to match a CSS
rule to set them display: none.
I want to be able to expand individual rows by clicking to them s
I would have thought you could do it with $('.selector').live
('mousrover', myMouseOverFunc).live ('mouseout', myMouseOutFunc);
On Apr 11, 8:36 pm, Walther wrote:
> I am looking for a way to simulate the actions of the hover (or
> mouseenter/mouseleave) whilst using the live method of binding (T
If you can find a reason why she doesn't want people to zoom I'd
appreciate it. Other than having a personal vendetta against the
visually-impaired I can't think of a single good reason.
It's pretty much moot anyway as there's just no way to do it. In the
bad old days of IE6 specifying font siz
Why the hell would you want to do that? Those are the shortcuts for
zooming the page. People who want to zoom the page usually want to do
so because they're having difficulty reading the default font size.
Indifference to accessibility needs is bad enough but deliberately
wanting to disable access
You cannot have forms within forms, they violate the rules regarding
how a HTML document should be structured. Furthermore, the browser
and the server both have no clue how to deal with them.
On Feb 27, 9:18 am, Po01 wrote:
> Hi, i have a HTML like that:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Supposing the field
I want to include an optional set of date setting fields on a form - A
dropdown for day (01 - 31 with a blank value), a dropdown for month
(01 - 31 with a blank value) and a four digit year input field.
The validation is as follows:
* The date is optional, if all fields are blank then assume no
.each isn't the best choice in this case, a good old-fashioned for
loop will be significantly faster.
Also, use an array of strings instead of a single one and string
concatenation. Using array.push () is faster than using the +=
operator on a string. Once the loop finishes use join () to get th
The only way would be to not have any javascript statements after the
open statement. If, however, you mean you don't want users triggering
other events or interacting with the page after a dialog has been
opened then you can do this by simply setting the dialog modal:true.
On Jan 28, 3:16 am, m
I know you've already said you can't release the code of your actual
project, but would it be possible for you to construct some test cases
that demonstrate the speed penalty that you are suffering in 1.3
compared to 1.2? It would be interesting to see what circumstances
are triggering this and w
an Sturm
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> good Question. I have problems with Fancybox and jQuery 1.3...
>
> Greetings,
> Stefan Sturm
>
> 2009/1/22 Gordon :
>
>
>
> > Just a quick question, is there a list of plugins that don't work with
> > jQuery 1.3, or
Just a quick question, is there a list of plugins that don't work with
jQuery 1.3, or a list of plugins that have been upgraded to work with
it? I want to be able to quickly check my list of plugins against a
list of known incompatibilities before upgrading.
Is there a list of plugins that aren't compatible with jQuery 1.3 or
that have been updated in order to do so? I'd like to be able to
check my plugins against a list if there is one before upgrading so I
don't get any nasty surprises.
es.
>
> Or, customize the metadata plugin to use other characters for
> embedding - no idea whats valid for XHTML 1.1.
>
> Jörn
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Gordon wrote:
>
> > We've been making ever more use of the excellent jquery.validate
> > plugin on
We've been making ever more use of the excellent jquery.validate
plugin on our various sites. In order that we don't have to write a
validation script for every page with a form we have been using the
embedded class style of rule definition, and as the rules we need for
validation have grown more
You could try the jQuery metadata plugin if you need the metadata to
be in the markup itself. If you don't then using data is probably a
better approach.
On Jan 12, 3:46 pm, alexquery wrote:
> I am creating a product/category tree using jquery. I would like to be able
> to store additional data
I've got a field on a web page that needs some javascript behaviour
when it gains or loses focus, so I attached the appropriate handlers
in a $(document).ready to the field.
It all works fine, except if the user focuses the input field before
the ready event fires. In this case the behaviour doe
$('input.required') would be faster.
On Dec 24, 1:52 am, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
> Is this legit?
>
> $(':input[class$="required"]')
>
> I know it'll work for a div:
>
> $('div[class$="required"]')
>
> but it doesn't seem to work to designate an input
> with a class that has "required" on the en
The only way to do that without a separate black and white image would
be to use the filter CSS property, which is nonstandard and would only
work in internet explorer.
On Dec 23, 11:16 am, "Paul Collins" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to think this is possible with JQuery, but can't find a refer
I wrote a test page with 4 different methods for hiding the rows.
http://www.w3.org/
TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Untitled Document