the JS developments.
>
> On Sep 3, 4:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yup John believes TraceMonkey is much better than v8
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Dana Woodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > So you're saying that since Jon
So you're saying that since Jon "thinks" TraceMonkey is better than V8
(despite the actual tests), than it must be? Or am I reading what you
wrote wrong?
On Sep 3, 2008, at 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear folk ,
> for more information please check this Article which John Resig
> pe
The lack of a plugin system is a major drawback that will hinder
adoption dramatically, especially among tech crowds. I have tried out
Chrome and admit that I am impressed with it's speed, simplicity and
specs, But I will not be able to even think about using it as a
primary browser till a plugin
Gracias amigo, that did the trick! I knew it was simple ;-)
On Aug 24, 4:27 pm, MorningZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ".find()" should help
>
> $(this).find("ul > li > a").each(
>
> )
eturning the correct results.
Im sure this is easy, could someone point me in the right direction?
Cheers,
Dana
Oh sweet, thanks you two, that clears it up for me. I knew I was
missing something.
Cheers,
Dana
On Jul 24, 2:52 pm, MorningZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And just so it makes sense on why Karl's answers are what they are is
> that in
>
> $('img.thumb').eac
6 matches
Mail list logo
