-Bounce-
Anybody???
On Jan 16, 11:40 am, Photomaximum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First post for me. I a photographer and an absolute jquery & scripting
> newby.
>
> I looked through many scripts before finding Fancybox. I really like
> it. I am very, very new to scripting and Jquery though. I know HTML
>
ricardo, no offense--
the only part of this thread you need to worry about is the first
post:
to insulate your 3rd-party candy (such as a suckerfish menu) from your
site's css, globally replace: ";" with " !important;" in the candy's
css.
that's it.
the rest of this thread is geeks debating hy
This article should help if you want to use google.load
http://www.devshed.com/c/a/AJAX/Using-the-jQuery-Framework-with-Googles-Ajax-Libraries-API/2/
but i'd just suggest using the
Are you using jQuery UI drag and drop or easydrag? Seems you have both
included.
- Richard
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:36 PM, even971 wrote:
>
> I would like to show with the alertbox "Droped!" when I dropping
> ".player" in ".fishing". However that doesn't work except .droppable-
> activ and .dr
yup, that's right.
On 1月18日, 上午6時49分, MorningZ wrote:
> One problem is you have to wait for all the images to actually be
> loaded (something that is not guarenteed inside document.ready
>
> so switch
>
> $(function()
>
> to
>
> $(window).load(function()
>
> and you'll get the results
>
> On Jan
Dear all,
I use some behavior hack, like the famous Whatever:hover (http://
www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html), when I upgrade jQuery to v1.3,
it cause this hack to lose efficacy, but works well under jquery v1.2.
any body? meet the same problem with me? or any good ideas?
Hi Charlie,
I'm not seeing the problem. It looks like there is some extra white
space after method names, but it's certainly readable. Here is a
screenshot:
http://skitch.com/kswedberg/bbte7/jquery.com-in-ie7
Can you post a screenshot of what you're seeing, too, so I can try to
diagnose
For those who don't follow the dev list, John replied there. It turns
out there was another ticket filed for the same bug, and he has
already taken care of it:
Yep - that's a duplicate of #3873 and has already been fixed!
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3873
--Karl
On Jan 17, 2009, at 5:31
Hello. I have a jcarousel on a page of my Drupal 6 site. Everything
works beautifully, except this one thing...
I added this function so that the buttons disappear and the carousel's
automatic scrolling stops whenever the mouse hovers over it:
carousel.container.hover( function() { carousel.stop
Hello
Im beginer with ajax and i nead help .
I use the autocomplate plugin and i have this code
$("#suggest13").autocomplete(customers, {
minChars: 0,
width: 310,
matchContains: true,
autoFill: false,
formatI
i think your problem is your html, not superfish. your html may be
badly formed. my html editor pointed out some errors:
My Pools
Football
Hockey
NHL
Playoff Bracket
playoff09
myplayoff
Straight Pickem
NHL09
You are really fast!!! Thank you.
This is the problem. A minute after I posted I realized my mistake,
but could not stop the post...
On Jan 17, 4:35 pm, "Mauricio \(Maujor\) Samy Silva"
wrote:
> You missed a # in the color sintax:
> $(this).css('background-color', '00');
> Should be:
> $(thi
Has anybody else had issues with this or am I the only one?
Sergio
On Jan 17, 5:02 pm, "sguerr...@gmail.com" wrote:
> No this did not help
>
> As seen by my html this should work properly but it doesnt:
>
>
>
>
> My Pools
>
>
> Football
>
> Hockey
>
> NHL
You missed a # in the color sintax:
$(this).css('background-color', '00');
Should be:
$(this).css('background-color', '#00');
-Mensagem Original-
De: "Ron"
Para: "jQuery (English)"
Enviada em: sábado, 17 de janeiro de 2009 22:13
Assunto: [jQuery] Changing bg color of cell do
When I click on the green cell (td.commsion), its color changes to
black. It works fine in IE.
In FF the bg color does not change (I do see the console.log message).
Any idea why?
Here's the code:
$(document).ready(function() {
$("td.commision").click(
hi Ricardo
i think you're not understanding the nature of css conflicts (has
nothing to do with "badly" written code), or you're not understanding
how super-simple this technique is (no "fuss", it's a simple 2-second
tweak), or i'm not understanding you (are you just trying to be cute?)
Ofcourse. I figured it was such a simple solution.
Thanks for the great code and for taking the time and effort to help us out!
I need to use Firebug alot more too I see.
-Chris
malsup wrote:
>
>
>> I'm using the jQuery Cylce Plugin(http://malsup.com/jquery/cycle/) and I
>> ran
>> into so
hi all,
its only me or somebody has problem with jquery.com?? In IE7 I dont
see after a few seconds white background and pages are unreadable.
Only main page is working correctly. Thx for info
> I'm using the jQuery Cylce Plugin(http://malsup.com/jquery/cycle/) and I ran
> into some problems when I added it to some other pre-exising code I have.
>
> 1. Here is the working Slideshow
> -http://www.idea-palette.com/testfolder/slideshowtest.html
>
> When I add the existing working Slidesho
On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:41 PM, MorningZ wrote:
I can't find the page where it's mentioned, but i am pretty sure that
"google.load" happens *asynchronously*, meaning that once in a while
maybe the jQuery library isn't loaded yet before $(document).ready
()l
I'd suggest before doing or bl
Hello all,
I'm using the jQuery Cylce Plugin(http://malsup.com/jquery/cycle/) and I ran
into some problems when I added it to some other pre-exising code I have.
1. Here is the working Slideshow -
http://www.idea-palette.com/testfolder/slideshowtest.html
When I add the existing working Slides
One problem is you have to wait for all the images to actually be
loaded (something that is not guarenteed inside document.ready
so switch
$(function()
to
$(window).load(function()
and you'll get the results
On Jan 17, 3:27 pm, "David .Wu" wrote:
> This is the way I got the size now, is the
I can't find the page where it's mentioned, but i am pretty sure that
"google.load" happens *asynchronously*, meaning that once in a while
maybe the jQuery library isn't loaded yet before $(document).ready
()l
I'd suggest before doing or blaming anything to take the Google AJAX
Libraries
Hi Nic,
No worries. You're right about :first-child.
Ricardo, I have no idea why it wasn't caught in the test suite. Seems
like another handful of tests are warranted. I posted a message on the
dev list, pointing to this thread and the bug ticket, so hopefully
John can get it taken care of
On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Dave Methvin wrote:
Could you put together a page that fails? The .ready() method works
reliably for me.
http://lobitos.net/wx?loc=12345&fmt=wide
I added a button 'jqtest' that uses bind-on-ready to do the same thing
that the 'raw' button does with onclick, and
Sry for confusing, but that pcs of code was from testing page, where I
tested all alternatives..
On Jan 17, 10:19 pm, "Nic Luciano" wrote:
> Ah, Karl, I see the issue now. I was also confused with the original usage
> since the discussion was about :first but he was using :first-child. So let
>
Could you put together a page that fails? The .ready() method works
reliably for me.
pity, that I need new feuture .live actually, thats why I used 1.3
version. Is any predicition when it can be solved?
On Jan 17, 10:19 pm, "Nic Luciano" wrote:
> Ah, Karl, I see the issue now. I was also confused with the original usage
> since the discussion was about :first but he was using :f
No this did not help
As seen by my html this should work properly but it doesnt:
My Pools
Football
Hockey
NHL
Playoff Bracket
playoff09
myplayoff
Are you using jQuery at all?
$.get('functions.php', {moviename:movie}, function(xmlResponse){
$('#pla').html( $(':first', xmlResponse) );
});
docs.jquery.com/Ajax
On Jan 17, 2:55 am, anjith wrote:
> I am tired select box function for geting datafrom the database and
> display in tabular for
> variety, yes:
>
> $('.post a').filter('[href$=.png],[href$=.jpg],[href$=.gif]')
>
> On Jan 17, 7:02 pm, Karl Swedberg wrote:
>
> > On Jan 17, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Mike Alsup wrote:
>
> > >> I use a light-box plugin on my
> > >> website,http://www.FreeSoftwareWorkshop.com
> > >> and I need to sele
height() indeed works for hidden elements. If the element has
display:none set it will briefly set display back, add
visibility:hidden and return the correct height. See it working in
this test page:
http://jsbin.com/ucumo/
you said that ".hide() causes the **parent** element to loose its
height
I would like to show with the alertbox "Droped!" when I dropping
".player" in ".fishing". However that doesn't work except .droppable-
activ and .droppable-hover.
Why alert("Dropped") doesn't work ?
map
#map
{
That's way too much fuss for badly written CSS :)
On Jan 17, 5:10 pm, johny why wrote:
> right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
>
> if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
> with your candy css, it MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css--
> causing your cand
Can't you get the width of the parent div? (If it has width:auto)
Otherwise the way you're doing it is just fine.
On Jan 17, 6:27 pm, "David .Wu" wrote:
> This is the way I got the size now, is there any function can do the
> same thing?
>
> Html code
>
>
Thank you very much guys, worked like a charm.
I once posted a question in the Adsense group and got a reply in 3
days (that didn't helped a bit). Here I've got a response in 20
minutes. :)
Keep up the good work!
Ah, Karl, I see the issue now. I was also confused with the original usage
since the discussion was about :first but he was using :first-child. So let
me ask, in your test, li a:first should only return one element (as per
docs, :first should always only return one element), correct? And
first-chil
variety, yes:
$('.post a').filter('[href$=.png],[href$=.jpg],[href$=.gif]')
On Jan 17, 7:02 pm, Karl Swedberg wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Mike Alsup wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> I use a light-box plugin on my website,http://www.FreeSoftwareWorkshop.com
> >> and I need to select the links tha
I assume it is the general bug, so lets hope it will be fixed asap.
On Jan 17, 10:13 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
> I know this isn't the dev list, but I'm curious about how come these
> bugs weren't caught by the test suite?
>
> On Jan 17, 6:50 pm, Karl Swedberg wrote:
>
> > Nic,
> > Actually, it
I know this isn't the dev list, but I'm curious about how come these
bugs weren't caught by the test suite?
On Jan 17, 6:50 pm, Karl Swedberg wrote:
> Nic,
> Actually, it is a bug, at least in the sense that the results are
> different from those of any previous version of jQuery.
>
> It isn
i was having superfish problems too. i resolved them with the !
important method. might be your solution.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/fda8d8c533d6ae09
On Jan 17, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Mike Alsup wrote:
I use a light-box plugin on my website,http://www.FreeSoftwareWorkshop.com
and I need to select the links that end in .png, .jpg or .gif.
This is how I use the selector (it works only for .png):
$(function(){
$(".post a[href$=.png]").ligh
yo javascript dudes please help :/, I am trying to get this working
but failing miserably because it is from a pre-made script that I got
from a tutorial, and I am modifying it to try and make it do what I
want. I am not really all that good with jquery yet, I know just
enough to be dangerous. I h
Hi Karl,
That seems to have worked perfectly. I was quite happy to wait for a new
version but thank you for attending to this so quickly!
Cheers,
Diego A.
2009/1/15 Karl Swedberg
> Thanks, Balazs!
> Hi Diego,
> I took a quick look at the moreSelectors script and noticed that it uses
> the [...
> I use a light-box plugin on my website,http://www.FreeSoftwareWorkshop.com
> and I need to select the links that end in .png, .jpg or .gif.
> This is how I use the selector (it works only for .png):
>
> $(function(){
> $(".post a[href$=.png]").lightBox({
>
> });
> });
>
> How can modify
Nic,
Actually, it is a bug, at least in the sense that the results are
different from those of any previous version of jQuery.
It isn't just about :first, though. It has to do with multiple-
descendant selectors in general. I've provided a test case at http://test.learningjquery.com/selector
Well, maybe
In my first use of jQuery, I attached a visibility toggle function,
via document ready, to a button (button by id, toggling by class), and
got very erratic results. Typically, the toggle didn't work on first
load of the document, but tended to work if the document was reload
Hello,
I use a light-box plugin on my website, http://www.FreeSoftwareWorkshop.com
and I need to select the links that end in .png, .jpg or .gif.
This is how I use the selector (it works only for .png):
$(function(){
$(".post a[href$=.png]").lightBox({
});
});
How can modify the above i
The is an error in the javascript file, and only allows the main menu
to have 3 layers of sub menus, after that the 4th layer appears opened
along with the 3rd layer, and does not work as desired. Can anybody
provide a fix for this?
Sergio
Well, maybe
In my first use of jQuery, I attached a visibility toggle function,
via document ready, to a button (button by id, toggling by class), and
got very erratic results. Typically, the toggle didn't work on first
load of the document, but tended to work if the document was reloaded
fro
jQuery has true. How can I select first link? this is original
question. And why doesnt work this code $('#menu li a:first')?
On 17 Led, 21:39, "Nic Luciano" wrote:
> That's true, but that's exactly how it's supposed to function.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, jQuery Lover wrote:
>
>
> Actually in this case parents('form') of the clicked object does not
> include the form tag itself and I believe it's due to the poor html
> structure. I just tested this out.
It's tough to script on back markup. Different browsers will do
different things in an attempt to figure out what you
Hi,
How i can to know resolution of browser?
Thank´s
That's true, but that's exactly how it's supposed to function.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, jQuery Lover wrote:
>
> No he is not!
>
> Suppose you have this scenario:
>
>
>
>Home
>Rules
> Pilots
> Briefing
> IGC
> > ... i need to use AJAX because the servlet called is appended with input
> > parameters that contains 1 to 5 charectars and when i directly call
> > the servlet instead of making ajax call the url is not completely formed
> > and the servlet is not invoked.
>
> You can change your fo
No he is not!
Suppose you have this scenario:
Home
Rules
Pilots
Briefing
IGC
Results
Forum
$('#menu li:first a').remove() - will do nothing here, since first li
has no anch
Try this two options:
$('a').unbind('click'); // not sure if it works or not
OR
$('a').click(function(){
window.location=$(this).attr('href');
return false;
});
and put this code after all other javascript codes!
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Mon,
I suggest you to use the toggleClass and your code should look like
this
$('#tn-loading').toggleClass('hide');
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#tn-loading').toggleClass('hide');
});
.hide{ dispaly:none;}
so let me explain it this way , we first apply the .hide to the tn-
loading, and when t
Well, you are right, thx for explanation. Now it is clear!!
On 17 Led, 21:04, Pedram wrote:
> hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
> $('#menu li:first a').remove()
> this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
> code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks ea
This is the way I got the size now, is there any function can do the
same thing?
Html code
You can change your form method attribute to post and you would not
have the too long url problem.
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:52 AM, RUQUIA TABASSUM
wrote:
> ... i need to use AJAX because the servlet called is appended wi
Shouldn't it simply be
$(':not(div):has(div)') ?
Note that it gives you all the chain of parents to the element which
contains a DIV.
On Jan 16, 6:26 pm, jdwbell wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply. I am finding that with the
> example listed below these two work as expected (that is
Well, it depends where you need it...
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM, webmas...@terradon.nl
wrote:
>
> Where and how do i implement var fileName = $(this).attr('src');
>
$(this).parents('table:first')
or in jQuery 1.3:
$(this).closest('table');
- ricardo
On Jan 16, 5:13 pm, Coryt wrote:
> after learning the difference between parents and parent, I am having
> to resort to using parent(), but it's not very clean.
>
> Consider the following table, which is embe
Use jquery's get() method. More about it here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.get
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:40 PM, dirk w wrote:
>
> ides anyone?
>
> On 12 Jan., 17:43, dirk w wrote:
>> thanks a lot for your help!
>> is
Don't worry 1.3.1 is going to be released soon
On Jan 17, 12:38 am, ChenKaie wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I use some behavior hack, like the famous Whatever:hover
> (http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html), when I upgrade jQuery to v1.3,
> it cause this hack to lose efficacy, but works well und
hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
$('#menu li:first a').remove()
this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks each li and
removes the so all of the links will be removed so in your case
your code should look like
Actually in this case parents('form') of the clicked object does not
include the form tag itself and I believe it's due to the poor html
structure. I just tested this out.
On Jan 17, 2:15 pm, Alex Kachayev wrote:
> If I undestood the task right, you can create code in such way.
>
> You form will
Yeap, you can bind all images with .gallery class a .load() event like this:
$('img.gallery').load(function(){
$(this.).removeClass('loading').show();
});
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, jinscoe wrote:
>
> Whoops! I'm s
so let's both remove our off-topic threads, ok? and no hard feelings, and glad
she's not preggo
- Original Message -
From: jQuery Lover
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 11:45 AM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!
That tests must be in average. I made some test on .class selectors
and it showed 25x faster.
Here is the test and it's results:
http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com/2009/01/jquery-126-and-jquery-13-class-selector.html
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, ryan.joyce...@googlemail.com
wrote:
>
> nice
You made a good point, I should have replied to you personally!
PS. Please don't take it personal. That was (kinda) a joke. I guess we
are in a better mood here and all of my friends that I MADE TO look
through the the thread said 'Good one' :
PSS. Nothing personal Johny... just a sunny day a
If I undestood the task right, you can create code in such way.
You form will be like this:
http://jquery.com"; method="post" id="myForm">
Convertion(1000, this) will return:
true, if it`s neccesary to submit form.
false, in other case.
For this question: 'Is there another way to get
ok, thx for your help guys, because it made me crazy for a while and
thx for your bug report jQuery Lover. I am new pretty new and jQuery I
am using 2-3 weeks and it is great TOOL!!!
On 17 Led, 20:33, jQuery Lover wrote:
> Submitted a ticket:http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3903
>
> Let's see what h
jQuery Lover, i'm a programmer. i'm a perfectionist when it comes to
wording. Unfortunately, google groups does not provide a draft
feature, OR preview feature, OR edit-after-posting feature, which i
find galling and irritating. i'll try to get my wording right before
posting.
secondly, the idea
Submitted a ticket: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3903
Let's see what happens :)
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
> so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?
>
> On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover wrote:
>>
so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?
On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover wrote:
> It is...
>
>
> Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
> > yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
> >
It is...
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
> yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
> scripts. I thought that "#menu li a" is regular CSS selector...or
> not??
>
yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
scripts. I thought that "#menu li a" is regular CSS selector...or
not??
On 17 Led, 20:23, jQuery Lover wrote:
> Interesting but it [ $('#menu li a:first') ] does not work in 1.3 !!!
>
>
> Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://j
Interesting but it [ $('#menu li a:first') ] does not work in 1.3 !!!
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
> hmm, it seems as my stupidity :-) so there is no need use element
> in this case. Originally I had
> repeatedly reposting the same comment
And the idea is clear already. Use "!important", but use it with
care... Simple and clear...
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:16 AM, johny why wrote:
>
> jquery Lover, let go of what? this
hmm, it seems as my stupidity :-) so there is no need use element
in this case. Originally I had code $('#menu li a:first'), but it
works only under 1.2.6, not under 1.3 Am I correct?
On 17 Led, 20:09, jQuery Lover wrote:
> Exactly, just like I wrote!!!
>
> > $('#menu a:first').remove();
>
> --
jquery Lover, let go of what? this technique? this thread? or my
repeatedly removing and reposting the same post, because you get an
email alert every time?
On Jan 17, 11:10 am, jQuery Lover wrote:
> OFFTOP:
>
> Johny, just let it go already... :)))
>
>
> Read jQuery HowTo Resource - htt
right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, it MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css--
causing your candy to display wrong!
fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
unlike
OFFTOP:
Johny, just let it go already... :)))
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:07 AM, johny why wrote:
>
> right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
>
> if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
> w
Exactly, just like I wrote!!!
> $('#menu a:first').remove();
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nic Luciano wrote:
> The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
> you're doing by using that is
right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, that would create a conflict in your candy, which
MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
display wrong!
fortunately, !important seems
Simple correction, I meant the first child of it's parent*. Just in case it
wasn't clear.
Cheers-
Nic
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Nic Luciano wrote:
> The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
> you're doing by using that i
The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
whic
right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, that could create a conflict in your candy, which
would resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
display wrong! (even though you used !importan
IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html
On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover wrote:
> What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
> and it is working!!!
>
> I have just triple checked...
>
> $('#menu a:first').remove();
>
> removes the
You must be loading your page 2 with an ajax call!
Add your empty text replacer to the ajax call callback.
PS. I haven't checked but I think you can rewrite your jquery code for
better performance like this:
$(".tablesorter").each(function() {
$('tbody tr td', this).each(function() {
right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.
if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, that could create a conflict in your candy, which
would resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
display wrong! (even though you used !importan
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/1c6403c5f628d45a
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
> code:
>
>
>
>Home
>
What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
and it is working!!!
I have just triple checked...
$('#menu a:first').remove();
removes the first anchor in the list.
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Ch
of i add .remove() of course
On 17 Led, 19:32, Charlie22 wrote:
> I tested it, but it remove all "a", so sry, it doesnt work :-(
>
> On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover wrote:
>
>
>
> > Removing li solves the problem:
>
> > $('#menu a:first');
>
> >
> > Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jqu
You can write a javascript function that will add a row count column
and after every table sort action will fire to clean the content of
the column and repopulate it with numbers from 1 to 100. You can use
tablesort's events:
$("table").bind("sortEnd",function() {
// write your code here
});
-
I tested it, but it remove all "a", so sry, it doesnt work :-(
On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover wrote:
> Removing li solves the problem:
>
> $('#menu a:first');
>
>
> Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
Hello!
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:04 PM, jQuery Lover
wrote:
>
> I am not 100% sure, but I remember reading somewhere that jQuery looks
> for "=?" to replace the "?" part of the pattern.
>
> Try querying
>
> http://example.com/xxx/yyy/=?
Yes, this works! But need some trick, because jquery repla
Removing li solves the problem:
$('#menu a:first');
Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 wrote:
>
> Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
> a first link in code below. Can you help me
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
