On Sat, Apr 07, 2007, Diego A. wrote:
> It works, but I think that is a terrible idea.
> You'll have to edit the jQuery source every-time there is new release.
> I take a different approach:
> 1. Load jQuery source.
> 2. Make changes to suit my application.
> [...]
You don't really have to repea
On 4/6/07, Ariel Jakobovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just curious, what changes about the server's behavior when the x-Method
is specified as Ajax?
By itself, it doesn't do anything. But in your server-side code, you can
look for this (or more accurately, look for an HTTP header named
"X-Re
Mike Alsup schrieb:
$("#form").reset() should work if it is a correct form. (We attempt to
trigger the default event wherever possible.)
Huh? The reset event is not bound by jQuery. Are you thinking of submit?
No, starting with jQuery 1.1 element events are also triggered. The
followin
Diego A. schrieb:
I ended up changing my server application to look for the header "x-Method =
Ajax" and it works just fine.
Oh well, jQuery already adds a custom header to each Ajax request:
"X-Requested-With: XmlHttpRequest"
-- Klaus
D'oh. I shoulda known that :-/
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 7:34 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Traversing the dom selecting ever other dom
This should do it:
$("div:even").ad
This should do it:
$("div:even").addClass("superCoolClass");
On 4/6/07, Jeffrey Kretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not 100% sure I follow your question, but you could do this:
$('div').each(function(i)
{
if (i%2)
{
$(this).add
I'm not 100% sure I follow your question, but you could do this:
$('div').each(function(i)
{
if (i%2)
{
$(this).addClass('newClass');
}
});
"i" is a variable passed by the each method that starts at 0 and inc
I was wondering how I can traverse through the dom and start at a div
and then select every other div until i want it to stop so that I may
add a class to it.
Any Ideas?
Thanks
Tom
Did you contribute this back to the Metadata community?
- Original Message
From: Diego A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 6, 2007 3:54:52 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: IE XML parsing problem
I've been fighting with this bug too and I believe I've foun
JavaScript arrays support a simple sort() method for this task. This
will give you a lexicographically (dictionary) sort from A-Z.
$(function(){
arrStudents = new Array();
$(".student").each(function(i){
arrStudents[i] = $(this).text();
});
arrStudents = arrStudents.sort();
$
Just curious, what changes about the server's behavior when the x-Method is
specified as Ajax?
- Original Message
From: Diego A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 6, 2007 5:48:20 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Unique parameter in Ajax
Thanks for the qui
thanks a bunch guys!
lagos.tout
On Apr 6, 6:00 pm, "Diego A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It works, but I think that is a terrible idea.
> You'll have to edit the jQuery source every-time there is new release.
> I take a different approach:
> 1. Load jQuery source.
> 2. Make changes to suit my a
The issue becomes the character count. If I pull the string as HTML,
and use the max length provided, then I would have to use a regular
expression to skip html tags in the count. That part would not be so
hard, but if the truncate needs to happen in the middle of a child
tag, I would have to pull
It works, but I think that is a terrible idea.
You'll have to edit the jQuery source every-time there is new release.
I take a different approach:
1. Load jQuery source.
2. Make changes to suit my application.
I think the best way to handle ajax responses is to add another
function layer:
$.exte
Thanks for the quick response guys. This message had been pending for a few
days and I've since managed to work around the problem, but I think this
might be a bug.
By doing this...
$.ajaxSetup({ global:true, data:{'ajax':'y'} });
... jQuery should:
1. add 'ajax = y' to the data submitted when I
The reason this happens is that is not a replacement for .
s are supposed to contain s.
See: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_thead.asp
> "Note: The must have a tag inside!
>
> Note: If you use the thead, tfoot and tbody elements, you must use every
> element.
> They should appear in this o
I did! Thanks, Klaus. :-)
I think you meant:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/68592545316c1e4a/3dcffd978d8d77d5#3dcffd978d8d77d5
;-)
Mike Alsup schrieb:
Oops, wrong thread, sorry. Klaus had a nice post on this one:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5ec973dd2ca45738/3794cc7ced0f3ee0#3794cc7ced0f3ee0
I think you meant:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/68592545316c1e4
Oops, wrong thread, sorry. Klaus had a nice post on this one:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5ec973dd2ca45738/3794cc7ced0f3ee0#3794cc7ced0f3ee0
On 4/6/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ariel and Jörn posted some good ideas on this thread:
http://groups.
Ariel and Jörn posted some good ideas on this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5ec973dd2ca45738/3794cc7ced0f3ee0#3794cc7ced0f3ee0
I'd like to add a unique parameter to every ajax call jquery makes.
I need this to happen on get and post commands (ie.: form s
I'd like to add a unique parameter to every ajax call jquery makes.
I need this to happen on get and post commands (ie.: form submits too).
Does anyone have an idea of how to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unique-parameter-in-Ajax-tf3440508s15494.html#a9593357
Has anyone else had problems fetching elements on a XML document in IE?
Anyone solved it?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IE-XML-Bug-tf3525509s15494.html#a9835861
Sent from the jQuery Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've been fighting with this bug too and I believe I've found the fix.
I can't be 100% sure, but I believe the problem was in the jquery.metaData
plugin.
The fix has worked for me and 2 other people so far...
Here is the fix I posted on my blog, hope it helps. And if it does work for
you, then t
Sounds hard.
Have you seen this? Looks like a sort plugin.
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/jquery/sort/sort.js?rev=1
Maybe append and then immediately sort?
Glen
On 4/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a DIV (id = "classList") witih many smaller DIVs, each of clas
I checked in a new version that takes care of all the problems.
I based my test case on your example, located here:
http://lovepeacenukes.com/jquery/tests/tablesorter-mixed-data-types.html
/christian
2007/4/6, Kim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Err... I take that back.
-the only way for the
I think the alternative is for people who want to keep their classes
together even if some of them are browser specific.
For example, in the app I am working on the CSS is enormous. (dont ask)
And the whole thing is changing pretty rapidly.
And I am going to want to change certain things se
Hi,
I have a DIV (id = "classList") witih many smaller DIVs, each of class
"student". The smaller DIV only contains text. If I want to add a
new student DIV to the list, but add it in alphabetical order, is
there a simple, tried and true jQuery way of doing this?
Thanks, - Dave
Thanks,
I don't know why I tried to switch and use attr().
Previously I had been using css()
Everything is perfect now.
Allex
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:56 PM
To: jQuery (E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
There is an easier way that is not jQuery-or-Javascript-dependent,
since mostly we just want to know is the browser IE or not. Use
conditional comments around the BODY tag. See
http://www.puidokas.com/updating-my-css-for-ie7/
. I use :
Dan
No, IE doesn't treat styles as simple text, the way FF does (just like
$(' h1 {color: black}') works in FF but not in IE.
The style object is read-only and you can only set its members.
You should use $(...).css(...)
Danny Wachsstock
On Apr 6, 3:27 pm, "Smith, Allex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hrm...not a bad idea. I'll look into that.
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kristinn Sigmundsson
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:24 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Stop pending AJAX processes?
hmm how about then making a si
Now all we need is a hierarchical D&D tree and resizable layouts (with
content panes), and Interface beats Ext any day of the week in my book.
-- Yehuda
On 4/6/07, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey!
Props to you guys; I've been waiting for this for the longest time; it
definitely mak
Hey!
Props to you guys; I've been waiting for this for the longest time; it
definitely makes Interface development easier.
-- Yehuda
On 4/6/07, Marshall Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rey Bango wrote:
>
> Agreed. Interface is EXTREMELY important to the jQuery project. More
> so than any
hmm how about then making a single ajaxcall when opening a accordation menu
and splitting the returning result (using xml, json or whatever) and then
put it on the right place? That would make the request quite few and still
make the initial page load fast.
//Kristinn
On 4/6/07, Andy Matthews
On Apr 4, 10:48 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback desired:
>
> Lately, I have been developing CSS
and HTML for a deep Web 2.0 complex app.
> Usually, I avoid CSS hacks like the plague. But recently, I have had to
> resort to the Holly Hack or the StarHTML Hack. But then i
I got rid of the password hoping someone might be able to help. I'm
thinking maybe it's some conflict between Google Maps and jQuery, but
because of the IE weirdness, I can't even see the page to see if there
is an error.
Thanks!
/alex
On Apr 4, 2:11 pm, "Alex Ezell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry... fat fingered your name Glen.
Allex
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Allex
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:19 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: I'm going
It's not applying the style... I'm using the dump() plugin as well as
simply alerting it to the screen.
Allex
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Matthews
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:25 PM
To:
I'm working on a page that uses the Slider from interface.eyecon.ro.
Works perfectly the first time Slider is initialized.
However, re-initializing the slider *without a page load* is
problematic.
Here's what I'm currently using (it works):
// get rid of any existing indicators and reset
#!/usr/bin/perl
use LWP::UserAgent;
use CGI;
$ua = LWP::UserAgent->new;
$ua->agent("NuBrowser/10.7 ");
$res = $ua->request(HTTP::Request->new(GET => $ENV{QUERY_STRING};
$q = CGI->new;
print $q->header($res->headers->{'Content-Type'}),$res->content;
does it for me! real simple, classic perl cgi,
Thanks to you both. Both approaches work. I appreciate the tips.
On Apr 6, 12:33 pm, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Make that:
>
> $(document).ready( function() {
>
> var myArr = [];
> alert(myArr);
> $('label').each( function() {
> myArr.pus
Make that:
$(document).ready( function() {
var myArr = [];
alert(myArr);
$('label').each( function() {
myArr.push($(this).attr('for'));
});
alert(myArr);
});
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Maybe
Var myArr = [];
$('label').each(
myArr.push($(this).attr('for'));
);
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Buzzterrier
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:13 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Getting all labels
I w
Are you talking about viewing source in IE vs FF? Because if you perform an
action with jQuery, then view source in IE, you'll NEVER see the changes in
the code. However, using the "View Generated Source" option in FF's
developer toolbar allows you to see changes made using javascript.
Or are yo
Buzzterrier schrieb:
I want to get all labels in a form, and then access their "for"
attribute to link it to the field.
I thought that $("label") would give me an array of all label elements
that I could loop through and get the "for" value. But this does not
work and I know I am missing someth
Thanks Glin...
I'll give it a whirl.
Allex
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:07 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: I'm going
On 4/6/07, Steve Blades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought it was
$('#mytest').css({width:"200px"});
to set a style attribute?
The curly braces depend on if you want to set an array or a single one.
Check in www.jquery.com/api under CSS.
Its got a bunch of good examples.
Glen
I want to get all labels in a form, and then access their "for"
attribute to link it to the field.
I thought that $("label") would give me an array of all label elements
that I could loop through and get the "for" value. But this does not
work and I know I am missing something fundamental to Jque
Roman Weich schrieb:
RwL schrieb:
maybe something like this:
$('select').change(function(){
if ( $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + this.value + ']').not(this).length )
{
$('.formTip').show();
}
else
{
$('.formTip').hide();
I thought it was
$('#mytest').css({width:"200px"});
to set a style attribute?
--
Steve "Cutter" Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
_
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
---
The Past is a Memory
The Future a Dre
Test
$('#mytest').attr({style:"width:200px;"});
returns
Test in FF2
Test in IE6
I must be going mad.
Any suggestions as to where I might be going wrong?
On 4/6/07, Smith, Allex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Test
$('#mytest').attr({style:"width:200px;"});
returns
Test in FF2
Test in IE6
I must be going mad.
Any suggestions as to where I might be going wrong?
or if you need multiple:
$("#mytest'").css({ color: "red", width: "200px" });
On 4/6/07, Smith, Allex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Test
$('#mytest').attr({style:"width:200px;"});
returns
Test in FF2
Test in IE6
I must be going mad.
Any suggestions as to where I might be going wrong?
Why not do
$("#mytest").css("width","200px");
Glen
RwL schrieb:
maybe something like this:
$('select').change(function(){
if ( $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + this.value + ']').not(this).length )
{
$('.formTip').show();
}
else
{
$('.formTip').hide();
}
});
Just to make
> maybe something like this:
>
> $('select').change(function(){
> if ( $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]' + this.value + ']').not(this).length )
> {
> $('.formTip').show();
> }
> else
> {
> $('.formTip').hide();
> }
>
> });
Just
Thanks, Roman, this seems to do exactly what I need it to -- that's
twice in two days you've saved me from banging my head against a
wall. :)
On Apr 6, 1:29 pm, Roman Weich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RwL schrieb:
>
> > I'd like to extend this simple function but don't know what to do
> > ne
RwL schrieb:
I'd like to extend this simple function but don't know what to do
next:
$('select').change(function(){
$('.formTip').show();
});
What I really want this to do, is:
On the change event, check to see if any value of any element
on the page matches the value of any other o
Rey Bango wrote:
Agreed. Interface is EXTREMELY important to the jQuery project. More
so than any 3rd party library. Keep up the great work Stefan & Paul!
Rey...
Jeffrey Kretz wrote:
This is FANTASTIC!
I was worried that with Ext you might not want to continue
development. I
personally
Agreed. Interface is EXTREMELY important to the jQuery project. More so
than any 3rd party library. Keep up the great work Stefan & Paul!
Rey...
Jeffrey Kretz wrote:
This is FANTASTIC!
I was worried that with Ext you might not want to continue development. I
personally prefer Interface, an
Hi Mike,
Still new to all of this, but I used this:
$('#myAnchor').click(function() {
('#myForm').submit();
});
With the thought that the anchor would now fire the form's submit
event, which should be no different than a submit button. This seems
to work fine, but I am not an expert.
On Fe
SnapShot wrote:
More important... is there a way around it that is transparent to the
reader of the site?
If you have access to server-side java/cgi/php whatever, you
can proxy the URL you want to load. Look up "ajax proxy" for
a rundown of the issue.
--
paulw
I'm using this table sorter plugin:
http://motherrussia.polyester.se/docs/tablesorter/.
I'm curious how you all handle paged tabular data that also needs to be
sortable. I would typically rely on ajax to retrieve next 25 / previous 25
rows, but if the user can sort any column they want they
I'd like to extend this simple function but don't know what to do
next:
$('select').change(function(){
$('.formTip').show();
});
What I really want this to do, is:
On the change event, check to see if any value of any element
on the page matches the value of any other on the page -- i
Congratulatgions Karl! I am pre-ordering. (All the cool kids are doing
it.)
500 Pages! I hope there are alot of pictures. :)
Exciting times.
Glen
On 4/6/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the plug, Rey! :-)
As you might have gathered from the URL (
http://www.packtp
Thanks for the plug, Rey! :-)
As you might have gathered from the URL (http://www.packtpub.com/
jQuery/book), the book is being published by PACKT Publishing, based
in Manchester, UK. They're a relative newcomer to the publishing
world, but already they've managed to put together a pretty
Sweet! Do you know if there's gonna be an eBook version available?
On 4/6/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm VERY proud to announce that the first jQuery book, Learning jQuery,
is now available for pre-order! jQuery Project Team member Karl Swedberg
& Jonathan Chaffer have produced a
thanks Glen,it works great
On Apr 6, 9:30 am, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/6/07, phpLord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi;
>
> > I have been trying to enable/disable 4 group of radio sets by checking
> > and unchecking a checkbox.
>
> As a general rule of thumb, if you ha
The exception 'Permission denied to call method XMLHttpRequest.open'
apparently gets thrown if you attempt to load content from JavaScript
from another domain. Is this correct?
I'm trying to write a simple script to load an RSS feed to display on
my web site. What I thought would be a 5 minute
I wonder if someone can point me to a tutorial or some examples that
show me how to do the following. I am querying an XML db with a jQuery
form (copied from the official form plugin). The form data goes to a PHP
handler which then sends a POST method request to the db; the db returns
an XML
On 4/6/07, phpLord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi;
I have been trying to enable/disable 4 group of radio sets by checking
and unchecking a checkbox.
As a general rule of thumb, if you have a "for" loop, then you probably
could find those things with a selector.
Like
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED],[E
phutte,
>Thanks Dan and Kristinn, happy coding.
>$.post acts like ajax? $.ajax the same way like $.post, but for XML?
>I only want to post it, and i thought i could have the message 'Remote
>call in progress...', only cause it looks nice. But OK, i have to
>settle for submitting not through jQuer
This is FANTASTIC!
I was worried that with Ext you might not want to continue development. I
personally prefer Interface, and my project would suffer greatly without it.
Thanks for your continued work on this project.
JK
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAI
You are going to have problems with Internet Explorer on this one.
There are security issues with creating an element under one context and
moving it to another one.
Prior to 1.1.3, the following code would fail in IE:
$('Hello world').appendTo(iframe.contentWindow.document.body);
This is due
Thanks Dan and Kristinn, happy coding.
$.post acts like ajax? $.ajax the same way like $.post, but for XML?
I only want to post it, and i thought i could have the message 'Remote
call in progress...', only cause it looks nice. But OK, i have to
settle for submitting not through jQuery. This was mo
Hi;
I have been trying to enable/disable 4 group of radio sets by checking
and unchecking a checkbox.
My function is like below, what's wrong with that, or any suggestions
for this?
var points=new Array("creativity","composition","aesthetic","technic");
for (j in points )
{
phutte,
>A little testsite for any interested:
>http://socken.se/temporary.jquery.googlegroups/
>the files index.php + ./myexlauncher/secretmenu.php is probably the
>files of interest. There is no folders hidden in this temporary
>version, and no security what-so-ever, so please handle with care.
On Apr 6, 2007, at 8:53 AM, bmckenzie wrote:
$("#someParent").children().index(someElement) != -1 ;
Cool, Bruce!
you could also come at it from the other direction:
if ( $('#someChild').parent('someElement').length ) {
//do something
};
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.eng
I'm VERY proud to announce that the first jQuery book, Learning jQuery,
is now available for pre-order! jQuery Project Team member Karl Swedberg
& Jonathan Chaffer have produced a solid book that will get you up and
running with jQuery in no time.
To quote:
"This book begins with a tutorial
What I did on a page I was working on was just simply make a page
refresh after the ajax was finished, didn't really go with the whole
update thing, but the ajax call was still great so the page doesnt
need refreshing if I input a faulty password.
If this is ok then you could just do a
function(
Kristinn...
I was already planning on checking to make sure the hidden div wasn't empty.
That's def on the list...no need to do the call twice.
And thanks for mentioning the parent() thing. I hate doing that, but I tried
a few other things like directly referencing a specific parent and it didn
Dan...
The catch is that I'm not loading "all" of the info at once. It's
technically still an on demand process. The user is initiating it by opening
an accordion section. There's quite a lot of code coming back and the whole
enchilada might take longer than we would like. So I think this is a go
I think I've seen something like this for stopping ajax calls:
var ajaxcall = $.ajax()
ajaxcall.abort();
As I said, I _think_ I've seen it, could be worth testing if it works.
As for calling all the ajax calls, maybe a .each() might do the work?
and btw, I noticed that you are making the ca
On 4/6/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was only suggesting a small simplification of your code.
Ok, I gotcha now. Thanks Jörn!
Andy,
If you want all the information to just be there, then include it in the
original HTML and just hide it. The core benefit you gain by loading content
"on demand" is you only send the data that's necessary. If you ended up
doing a bunch of AJAX calls to load all the data, all you've done i
..also, it looks like shit in Internet Explorer, please favor Firefox!
A little testsite for any interested:
http://socken.se/temporary.jquery.googlegroups/
the files index.php + ./myexlauncher/secretmenu.php is probably the
files of interest. There is no folders hidden in this temporary
version, and no security what-so-ever, so please handle with care.
Click on the
Thanks Jörn.
On 4/6/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Sterling schrieb:
> right now I am doing something like:
>
>
$('/modules/module:eq('+currentModule+')/groups/group:eq('+currentGroup+')')
>
> And that is working, should I change that to something like:
>
>
$('/modules/
Benjamin Sterling schrieb:
right now I am doing something like:
$('/modules/module:eq('+currentModule+')/groups/group:eq('+currentGroup+')')
And that is working, should I change that to something like:
$('/modules/module:nth-child('+currentModule+')/groups/group:nth-child('+currentGroup+')')
Kenneth schrieb:
I don't think I understand. The code I originally posted will indeed
add the .focus class to the element(s), however once focus is lost the
.focus class remains.
I was only suggesting a small simplification of your code.
$inputs.focus(function(){
$(this).addClass('foc
John Resig schrieb:
$("#form").reset() should work if it is a correct form. (We attempt to
trigger the default event wherever possible.)
O wow, I just opened up the starterfile zip - it uses a
version of jQuery that's pre-dates jQuery 1.0! Yikes. No wonder the
code was acting strange f
Excellent work Stefan! This was a much needed feature and extremely helpful.
I can't wait to see how Interface 2 turns out! I'm sure its going to be
awesome and I especially like the fact that we continue to have a nice,
tight & lightweight library for our effects and UI controls. Excellent!
That did the trick and only added two code elements. Thanks MichaL!
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MichaL Sanger
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:44 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Using hoever() to highlight TR, but not the
right now I am doing something like:
$('/modules/module:eq('+currentModule+')/groups/group:eq('+currentGroup+')')
And that is working, should I change that to something like:
$('/modules/module:nth-child('+currentModule+')/groups/group:nth-child('+currentGroup+')')
What would be the difference
Oh...can you do that? That would make perfect sense. I just didn't want to
have to add a class to each TR unnecessarily.
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MichaL Sanger
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:44 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQ
On 4/6/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kenneth schrieb:
> Excuse me while I talk to myselfit looks like I could just use
> .blur(fn)nothing to see here, move along ;)
You don't even need that each call, focus does that for you.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
Dan the man!
If i understand you right, i have to 'DIV' the whole BODY so that the
whole page is updated? If i submit it without jQuery $.post, just
submitting it to the 'index.php?dir=hastbilder' (also the same
location where i'm at when submitting) as i have always submitted
forms before, and gr
First a small walk-through of what I've got now:
http://www.commadelimited.com/uploads/psychic
Right now, if you click any of the black images, it triggers an AJAX call
which places it's response in a hidden div. That's easy enough and already
works. In an effort to make this work as speedily as
Hi,
How would I go about dragging a DIV from an iframe on my page to the
main page itself? If anyone has any examples of how this is done, I
am most grateful.
Thanks, - Dave
What about add tbody tag around table rows that are not in thead and then
make this selector:
$('#myTable tbody tr')
MichaL
2007/4/6, Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've got a table which looks like this:
Name
Position
Salary
Seniority
aaron
systems
40,077
4 months
Opus,
>I have a form that I'm building in Drupal, that takes user input and
>crafts a support request email. I'm using a drop down box to list
>types of software that a client would need support with. I'd like to
>pull the result of the select and put it into a hidden text field so I
>can tailor
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
