Hi,
Here's a little fix to allow the `gcc_jit_type_get_size` function to
work on pointer types as well.
Cordially.
From 21e6e2d5ea897fc74d0e3194973093c58157e6fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillaume Gomez
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:56:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [PATH]
I can push it. Thanks for the (very quick) review!
Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 18:48, David Malcolm a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 23:47 +0100, Guillaume Gomez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's a little fix to allow the `gcc_jit_type_get_size` function to
>
Pushed as commit 4c18ace1cb69a31af4ac719850a66de79ed12e93.
Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 18:50, Guillaume Gomez
a écrit :
>
> I can push it. Thanks for the (very quick) review!
>
> Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 18:48, David Malcolm a écrit :
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 23:47 +010
Hi,
I just encountered the need to retrieve the name of an `rvalue` (if
there is one) while working on the Rust GCC backend.
This patch adds a getter to retrieve the information.
Cordially.
From d2ddeec950f23533e5e18bc0c10c4b49eef3cda3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillaume Gomez
Date: Sat
quate modifications to the inheriting classes.
Good catch, thanks!
Updated the patch and attached the new version to this email.
Cordially.
Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 11:51, Arthur Cohen a écrit :
>
> Hey Guillaume :)
>
> On 4/20/24 01:05, Guillaume Gomez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
... I most definitely forgot. Thanks! ^^'
Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 15:19, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> I believe you forgot to regenerate the ChangeLog.
>
> Le 2024-04-22 à 09 h 16, Guillaume Gomez a écrit :
> > Good point!
> >
> > New patch attached.
> >
&g
Good point!
New patch attached.
Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 15:13, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
>
> Please move the function to be on lvalue since there are no rvalue types
> that are not lvalues that have a name.
>
> Le 2024-04-22 à 09 h 04, Guillaume Gomez a écrit :
> > Hey Arthur
RETURN_IF_FAIL (lvalue->is_global () || lvalue->is_local (),
> NULL,
> NULL,
> "lvalue should be a variable");
>
>
> Le 2024-04-22 à 09 h 16, Guillaume Gomez a écrit :
> > Good point!
> >
>