On Sun, 2024-03-17 at 18:36 -0500, StrawberryTea wrote:
> Hello GCC libjit people,
Hi StrawberryTea
I'm the author/maintainer of libgccjit. I confess that I don't think
I've ever tried using LTO with libgccjit, but rustc_codegen_gcc appears
to, given:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;
On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 23:47 +0100, Guillaume Gomez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a little fix to allow the `gcc_jit_type_get_size` function to
> work on pointer types as well.
>
Thanks, looks good to me.
Are you able to push this, or do you want me to?
Dave
On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 21:15 +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
>
> > Am 30.04.2024 um 21:11 schrieb Jason Merrill via Gcc
> > :
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:44 AM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In implementing prange (pointer ranges), I have found a 1.74%
> > > slowdow
On Fri, 2024-05-10 at 15:46 +0200, Gerd Möllmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing Emacs using its native compilation on macOS, which is
> based on libgccjit.
>
> In this context, I'm currently failing to get .eln files (= .so,
> .dylib,
> .dll depending on the platform) with debug info. This has p
On Sun, 2024-06-02 at 22:01 -0500, Kewen Lin wrote:
> Joseph pointed out "floating types should have their mode,
> not a poorly defined precision value" in the discussion[1],
> as he and Richi suggested, the existing macros
> {FLOAT,{,LONG_}DOUBLE}_TYPE_SIZE will be replaced with a
> hook mode_for_
On Fri, 2024-06-14 at 10:16 +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> on 2024/6/13 21:44, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-06-02 at 22:01 -0500, Kewen Lin wrote:
> > > Joseph pointed out "floating types should have their mode,
> > > not a poorly define
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 19:56 +0200, Guillaume Gomez wrote:
> `param` is also inheriting from `lvalue`. I don't think adding this
> check is a good idea
> because it will not evolve nicely if more changes are done in
> libgccjit.
Sorry for not responding earlier.
I think I agree with Guillaume here
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 18:59 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> This patch adds a new API to produce an rvalue representing the
> alignment of a type.
> Thanks for the review.
Patch looks good to me (but may need the usual ABI version updates when
merging).
Thanks; sorry for the delay in review
19:45 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > Here's the updated patch.
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 20:04 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 17:29 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > > Hi.
&g
orry about the ambiguity.
Yes, you can push this one.
Thanks
Dave
> Regards.
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 12:14 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 16:55 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch allows comparing different insta
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 10:56 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
> Here's the updated patch.
Thanks for the update patch; sorry for the delay in reviewing.
The updated patch looks good for trunk.
Dave
>
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 12:45 -0500, David Malcolm
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 12:05 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Excerpts from David Malcolm's message of März 5, 2024 4:09 pm:
> > On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 19:33 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > See answers below.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-11-09 a
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 14:16 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 19:57 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 17:26 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch fixes getting the size of size_t (bug 112910).
> > >
>
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 17:17 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> I did split the patch and sent one for the bfloat16 support and
> another
> one for the vector support.
>
> Here's the updated patch for the machine-dependent builtins.
>
Thanks for the patch; sorry about the long delay in reviewin
will allow to check if other types are supported like
> > _Float16 and
> > _Float128.
> >
> > Here's the patch for libgccjit updated to include this file.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Le 2024-06-26 à 17 h 55, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > > On Sun
I've backported the following patches from trunk to releases/gcc-14
testsuite, jit: fix test-error-pr63969-missing-driver.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/665552.html
Trunk: r15-4360-gf8dcb559e615db.
GCC 14: r14-10854-g771873f0a95162
jit: reset state in varasm.cc [PR11
e-unknown-linux-gnu (cfarm120).
Pushed to trunk as r15-4580-g779c0390e3b57d.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR jit/117275
* toplev.cc (toplev::finalize): Call varasm_cc_finalize.
* varasm.cc (varasm_cc_finalize): New.
* varasm.h (varasm_cc_finalize): New decl.
Signed-off-by: Davi
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 08:36 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> Here's the updated patch.
> Thanks.
Sorry for the delay in responding.
The updated patch is good for trunk - thanks!
Dave
>
> On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 20:15 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-12
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 16:04 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 13:10 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 18:42 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch fixes the bug 113343.
> > > I&#
updated patch is OK
for trunk.
Sorry for not being clarifying earlier
Dave
>
> On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 18:05 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 17:36 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > This patch adds a vector permutation and ve
On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 21:45 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Random request...
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 11:14:38AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > Here's the updated patch and answers below.
> > >
> > > (GitHub link if you find it easi
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 12:40 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
> Here's the updated patch.
Thanks; the updated patch is good for trunk.
Dave
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 12:18 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 08:33 -0500, Antoni
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 11:59 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> This patch adds the ability to send const pointer as argument to a
> function.
> Thanks for the review.
Sorry for the long delay in responding to this.
I'm a bit worried that this might break some type-safety within
libgccjit, or th
think?
The test looks good to me, I don't think it needs a target filtering
directive since presumably any target on which it already passed
without the patch will still pass with the patch.
The patch is OK for trunk; thanks.
Dave
>
> On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 11:01 -0500, David Malcol
Here's the updated patch and answers below.
>
> (GitHub link if you find it easier for review:
> https://github.com/antoyo/libgccjit/pull/5)
>
> Thanks.
Thanks; I looked over the patch via the above link and it looks good to
me for trunk.
Dave
>
> Le 2024-06-26 à 18 h 49,
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 11:24 +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 11:03 +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On GNU Linux/Ubuntu/x86_64 I am using libgccjit++ (in
> > https://github.com/RefPerSys/RefPerSys/ - a GPLv3+ inference engine
> > project) but I ca
On Sat, 2024-12-14 at 18:11 +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-12-14 at 09:15 +0900, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> > Hi Hakan!
> > The current Guile is not AOT yet. Although the object file is ELF,
> > it's
> > just bytecode wrapped ELF header. So you can't run it as a regular
> > executable
On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 00:43 +0100, Maxime Devos wrote:
> > > Those willing to contribute a proper ahead-of-time compiler to
> > > GNU
> > > guile could use the GNU CC libgccjit library which is part of the
> > > GCC
> > > compiler.
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/
> >
> > ...and https://g
r call to tree_type_to_jit_type fails.
Don't abort on unknown types.
(jit_langhook_pushdecl): Replace gcc_unreachable with return of
NULL_TREE.
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm
---
gcc/jit/dummy-frontend.cc | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
di
your thoughts on this?
I'll take another look at PR 117886 now and see if I can implement
something.
Dave
>
> Thanks.
>
> Le 2025-01-22 à 08 h 38, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > libgccjit fails on startup on aarch64 (and probably other archs).
> >
>
test-pr117886-write-reproducer.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm
---
gcc/jit/jit-recording.cc | 10 +-
gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h | 10 ++
.../jit.dg/test-pr117886-write-reproducer.c | 103 ++
3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 2 delet
R other/116613
* dummy-frontend.cc
(jit_diagnostic_listener::on_report_diagnostic): Add
"final override".
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm
---
gcc/jit/dummy-frontend.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/jit/dummy-frontend.cc b/gcc/jit
On Sat, 2025-02-08 at 10:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> When configuring GCC with --program-suffix=-$(BASE_VERSION) to allow
> installation multiple GCC versions in parallel, the executable of the
> driver (gcc-$(BASE_VERSION)) gets recorded in the libgccjit.so.0
> library. Assuming, that you
33 matches
Mail list logo
