clolov commented on pull request #11214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11214#issuecomment-903224639
@ableegoldman - I have aimed to re-introduce the tests which explicitly
exercise the older API. I was debating whether or not to add back
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/tru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhipeng Liu updated KAFKA-13222:
Affects Version/s: 2.0.1
> Records in newly rolled segment couldn't be fetched by consumer
> -
jeqo commented on a change in pull request #11213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11213#discussion_r693484448
##
File path:
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/suppress/KTableSuppressProcessorSupplier.java
##
@@ -150,16 +153,16 @@ public
jeqo commented on a change in pull request #11213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11213#discussion_r693484714
##
File path:
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/test/MockInternalNewProcessorContext.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
jeqo commented on a change in pull request #11213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11213#discussion_r693487470
##
File path:
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/test/MockInternalNewProcessorContext.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
jeqo commented on a change in pull request #11213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11213#discussion_r693488664
##
File path:
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/test/MockInternalNewProcessorContext.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
splett2 commented on a change in pull request #11244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11244#discussion_r693517822
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/admin/ReassignPartitionsIntegrationTest.scala
##
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ class ReassignPartitionsIntegrat
splett2 commented on a change in pull request #11244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11244#discussion_r693517822
##
File path:
core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/admin/ReassignPartitionsIntegrationTest.scala
##
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ class ReassignPartitionsIntegrat
splett2 commented on pull request #11127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11127#issuecomment-903286581
@dajac
do you mind taking a look?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
jlprat commented on pull request #11228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11228#issuecomment-903309159
Thanks for your feedback @guozhangwang
I thought "simply" killing the thread was the original intention.
I'll look into killing the whole instance once @cadona provides his
guozhangwang commented on a change in pull request #11149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11149#discussion_r693539139
##
File path:
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/metrics/StreamsMetricsImpl.java
##
@@ -200,6 +201,30 @@ public Rock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402859#comment-17402859
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-13217:
---
Thanks [~ableegoldman] I think this is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402860#comment-17402860
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-8295:
--
We do not have a KIP yet, but I hope we can
guozhangwang commented on pull request #10798:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10798#issuecomment-903313112
Sorry @vamossagar12 for the late reply.. I took a look at the current PR and
it looks good to me. The throughput numbers seems promising as well. Could you
clean up the PR
guozhangwang commented on pull request #11181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11181#issuecomment-903356533
Hi @showuon . I am not sure what do you mean by "not all query cases", could
you elaborate a bit?
My understanding from your PR is that, the `upperRange` is called fo
ijuma commented on pull request #9590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9590#issuecomment-903376356
What's remaining to get this merged?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
showuon commented on pull request #11181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11181#issuecomment-903378114
@guozhangwang , thanks for checking the PR... on Sunday. :)
> So in practice for window stores, that suffix's first byte has a large
chance to be 0, and hence worth optimi
showuon edited a comment on pull request #11181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11181#issuecomment-903378114
@guozhangwang , thanks for checking the PR... on Sunday. :)
> So in practice for window stores, that suffix's first byte has a large
chance to be 0, and hence worth
showuon edited a comment on pull request #11181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11181#issuecomment-903378114
@guozhangwang , thanks for checking the PR... on Sunday. :)
> So in practice for window stores, that suffix's first byte has a large
chance to be 0, and hence worth
showuon commented on pull request #11187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11187#issuecomment-903380258
@guozhangwang , thanks for the response. I closed this PR because I think we
need a bigger change (maybe a KIP), to address this `byte[]` change to
`ByteBuffer` change, to make
showuon edited a comment on pull request #11187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11187#issuecomment-903380258
@guozhangwang , thanks for the response. I closed this PR because I think we
need a bigger change (maybe a KIP), to address this `byte[]` to `ByteBuffer`
change, to make
showuon edited a comment on pull request #11187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11187#issuecomment-903380258
@guozhangwang , thanks for the response. I closed this PR because I think we
need a bigger change (maybe a KIP), to address this `byte[]` to `ByteBuffer`
change, to make
jolshan commented on pull request #9590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9590#issuecomment-903381796
I think just the merge conflicts, a final lookover and an lgtm
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
jacky1193610322 commented on pull request #11127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11127#issuecomment-903421243
@splett2 do you have the lock profile before and after the patch?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
24 matches
Mail list logo