mjsax commented on PR #17931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17931#issuecomment-2694932880
This PR introduced a regression for EOS, and was reverted for `4.0.0`
release.
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19078
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
ableegoldman commented on PR #17931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17931#issuecomment-2529891486
Merged to trunk. Thanks for the fix!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
ableegoldman merged PR #17931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17931
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.ap
frankvicky commented on PR #17931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17931#issuecomment-2522265195
Hi @guozhangwang @ableegoldman
Thanks for review.
I have add a unit test for this case, PTAL 🐧
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
guozhangwang commented on PR #17931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17931#issuecomment-2521705409
LGTM overall, but I'm wondering if some more unit test cases would better
add to reflect the original bug? Up to @frankvicky and @ableegoldman
--
This is an automated message from
frankvicky opened a new pull request, #17931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17931
JIRA: KAFKA-18067
To avoid leaking producers, we should add a 'closed` flag to
`StreamProducer` indicating whether we should reset prouder.
### Committer Checklist (excluded from commi
