How to run a job which will require the slave to go offilne for while ?

2013-11-13 Thread EK
in that will allow me to continue running jobs even if slave goes offline while server retry to reconnect before it marks job stats as aborted or failed ? Best Regards EK -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubs

Running a job while slave is offline

2014-03-08 Thread EK
. run job 4. go online 5. report results ... Best Regards EK -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroup

Re: Running a job while slave is offline

2014-03-10 Thread EK
2014 2:31:40 AM UTC+2, Christian Willman wrote: > > Hi EK, > > What's the purpose of this exercise? It's very strange indeed. > > I guess you could add two System Groovy scripts to the particular job. The > first script is the first builder in the job's builders

Re: Running a job while slave is offline

2014-03-10 Thread EK
else, and have the build script connect to the actual build/test > machine using e.g. SSH and run the commands from there. > > On 08.03.2014, at 13:08, EK > wrote: > > > Hi ... > > > > I need to run a job which might cause slave to disconnect from Jenki

Build Flow Plugin and Folder Plugin issue

2014-05-11 Thread EK
Hi ... I am not able to call a job found in some other folder when running using build flow, my use case is as follow : 1. CommonJobs Folder which contain several jobs where "A" is a job among them 2. Project1 Folder which contains several jobs and the build flow job. if the build flow job in

Re: Build Flow Plugin and Folder Plugin issue

2014-05-12 Thread EK
I new it !!! CommonJobs/A solved the issue , I was thinking that this is the only thing I didn't try , thank you very much for your quick reply and helpful information. On Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:30:55 PM UTC+3, EK wrote: > > Hi ... > > I am not able to call a job found in

Re: Build Flow Plugin and Folder Plugin issue

2014-05-12 Thread EK
I new it !!! CommonJobs/A solved the issue , I was thinking that this is the only thing I didn't try , thank you very much for your quick reply and helpful information. On Monday, May 12, 2014 12:34:59 AM UTC+3, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > On 11.05.2014, at 22:30, EK > wrote:

Exception when I try to trigger buildflow job from workflow job

2016-01-21 Thread EK
Regards EK FATAL: Cannot cast object 'MyWorkFlowJobName #3' with class 'org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowRun' to class 'hudson.model.AbstractBuild'org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.typehandling.GroovyCastException <http://stack

Re: Exception when I try to trigger buildflow job from workflow job

2016-01-23 Thread EK
param1]] # this is my buildflowjob script, it takes param1 (string) from user when running println(params['param1'])); On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 3:45:12 PM UTC+2, EK wrote: > Hi , > > > I am facing the following error , we recently moved to

Re: Exception when I try to trigger buildflow job from workflow job

2016-01-24 Thread EK
tractBuild > in order to be compatible with workflow/pipeline plugin. > > -- > Craig > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:22 AM, EK > > wrote: > >> An example to reproduce : >> >> this is my workflow script , it takes param1 (string) from user when >> ru

Re: Exception when I try to trigger buildflow job from workflow job

2016-01-24 Thread EK
at 10:56:59 PM UTC+2, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi, > > It looks like you are running under Windows. I'm not sure if the tests > run under Windows. > Try: > > mvn -DskipTests install > > -- > Craig > > On Jan 24, 2016 4:05 AM, "EK" wrote: &g

workflow parallel and number of executers

2015-07-26 Thread EK
Hi , I am trying to move from build flow to workflow , but I am facing many issues in which some i have managed to overcome but now I am facing the following: while using build flow when running sub jobs in parallel they all where invoked in same executer on the master , but when I try to do

Re: workflow parallel and number of executers

2015-07-26 Thread EK
er. The only limitation(difference with build flow) I see now is that the sub workflow job is not being running under the same executer( or any other executer of the master) --> but this I think I can ignore. On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 10:58:06 AM UTC+3, EK wrote: > > Hi , > I am tryin