Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

Following custom build of Violations plugin (to fix similar issue with FxCop reports) resolved issue for me: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-17548 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

Ok, I see. Is it an option to switch to the checkstyle plug-in and see if it renders your results correctly? Ulli Am 17.01.2013 um 22:55 schrieb TeMc : > I use: > * jshint (not jslint) > * the --checkstyle-reporter it features > * written to an xml file > * read by publisher "Violations" in

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

I use: * jshint (not jslint) * the --checkstyle-reporter it features * written to an xml file * read by publisher "Violations" in the Jenkins job as type "checkstyle" -- Tem On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Ulli Hafner wrote: > Just to make sure that we are talking about the same plug-ins: > Are

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

Just to make sure that we are talking about the same plug-ins: Are you using the jslint and checkstyle plug-in? Or are you using the violations plug-in? My comments make only sense if you use the jslint plugin and then the checkstyle plugin;-) Ulli Am 17.01.2013 um 02:49 schrieb TeMc : > > O

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Ulli Hafner wrote: > >> Why does the Checkstyle page viewer need the full paths? All it needs to do >> is output the given file name (regardless of whether it exists or not) and >> the warnings/errors for those files. >> >> If it wants to use the paths to display

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

> Why does the Checkstyle page viewer need the full paths? All it needs to do > is output the given file name (regardless of whether it exists or not) and > the warnings/errors for those files. > > If it wants to use the paths to display samples of the code, how does that > work for old builds

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

Why does the Checkstyle page viewer need the full paths? All it needs to do is output the given file name (regardless of whether it exists or not) and the warnings/errors for those files. If it wants to use the paths to display samples of the code, how does that work for old builds? Files could

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

Hi I have something working, here : In the generated jshint.xml file, the full path is missing into the "name" attribute of each tag . For instance : ... You need to add the full path : in my case something like I was able to fix it with a sed oneliner : sed -E 's???' jshint.xml

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 4:04:25 AM UTC+1, djcbecroft wrote: > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Ullrich Hafner > > wrote: >> >>> On 04/29/2012 10:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:34 PM, timos wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Ullrich Hafner > wrote: > >> On 04/29/2012 10:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:34 PM, timos wrote: >> >>> The same problem here. At file system level I can see a generated >>> js

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > On 04/29/2012 10:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:34 PM, timos wrote: > >> The same problem here. At file system level I can see a generated >> jshint.xml file containing the JSLint errors, a violations/ >> violat

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

On 04/29/2012 10:46 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:34 PM, timos > wrote: > > The same problem here. At file system level I can see a generated > jshint.xml file containing the JSLint errors, a violations/ > violations.xml file a

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:34 PM, timos wrote: > The same problem here. At file system level I can see a generated > jshint.xml file containing the JSLint errors, a violations/ > violations.xml file and violations/file/.xml > files but still each file specific link leads to a blank page. > > Any u

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

The same problem here. At file system level I can see a generated jshint.xml file containing the JSLint errors, a violations/ violations.xml file and violations/file/.xml files but still each file specific link leads to a blank page. Any updates on this? Was anyone able to resolve the problem?

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

2012/2/13 Grzegorz Ślusarek > Bob Koertge gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I cannot seem to get detailed infomration on my errors with JSLint and > violations. Here is some screenshots http://screencast.com/t/Vu6vo2y9 -> > I get > the overall results, but clicking any of the .js file links leads to

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

Bob Koertge gmail.com> writes: > > I cannot seem to get detailed infomration on my errors with JSLint and violations.  Here is some screenshots http://screencast.com/t/Vu6vo2y9 -> I get the overall results, but clicking any of the .js file links leads to a blank page! http://screencast.co

Re: Violations Plugin and JSlint

I've had the same issues with the violations plugin and style cop/fxcop. Not sure why. Sent from my phone - any correct spelling is accidental. On 04/02/2012, at 3:33 AM, Bob Koertge wrote: > I cannot seem to get detailed infomration on my errors with JSLint and > violations. Here is some sc

Violations Plugin and JSlint

I cannot seem to get detailed infomration on my errors with JSLint and violations. Here is some screenshots http://screencast.com/t/Vu6vo2y9 -> I get the overall results, but clicking any of the .js file links leads to a blank page! http://screencast.com/t/LHM09UYw9ruf Anyone have any ide