Sure Mark, let's do that. I'll email you directly to arrange the details.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Mark Waite
wrote:
> If you're willing to help with the evaluation of a pull request, I believe
> that https://github.com/jenkinsci/git-plugin/pull/231 is the proposed
> pull request that i
If you're willing to help with the evaluation of a pull request, I believe
that https://github.com/jenkinsci/git-plugin/pull/231 is the proposed pull
request that is most likely to meet your needs.
I could build a pre-release of a git plugin which includes that pull
request, and could upload it to
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Mark Waite
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Jim Lloyd wrote:
>
>> Can't you obtain the results you want (on your different, but related
>>> concern) by asking your developers to push a new branch for changes which
>>> are to be built independently, rathe
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Jim Lloyd wrote:
> Hi Mark, thanks for the reply.
>
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:39:52 PM UTC-7, Mark Waite wrote:
>>
>> I thought I remembered a pull request submitted to the git plugin to
>> allow user definition of the comparison base. In your case, there is
Hi Mark, thanks for the reply.
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:39:52 PM UTC-7, Mark Waite wrote:
>
> I thought I remembered a pull request submitted to the git plugin to allow
> user definition of the comparison base. In your case, there is a "base
> branch" against which you want all comparisons,
I thought I remembered a pull request submitted to the git plugin to allow
user definition of the comparison base. In your case, there is a "base
branch" against which you want all comparisons, no matter the results of
the last job. Unfortunately, I didn't find it in the current pull requests
for
