t: Re: Hudson to Jenkins migration
I've read on the Jenkins site that I can replace the hudson.war file with the
jenkins.war file by backing up the hudson.war file and renaming the
jenkins.war file to hudson.war.
If I use a 1.3x jenkins.war file which is compatible with hudson 2.2.1
config format
I've read on the Jenkins site that I can replace the hudson.war file with the
jenkins.war file by backing up the hudson.war file and renaming the
jenkins.war file to hudson.war.
If I use a 1.3x jenkins.war file which is compatible with hudson 2.2.1
config format and after change over upgrade to la
I'm not familiar with the installers, but it would probably be a good
idea.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Les Mikesell
Sent: 12/18/2012 10:50 AM
To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Stuart Lorber
Subject: Re: Hudson to Jenkins migration
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Alex Earl
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Alex Earl wrote:
> It depends on what version. The last point at which it will probably
> work very well is 1.3x. After that the formats for the job and config
> XML diverged significantly.
Wouldn't it be best if the installers stopped trying to migrate old
hudson
It depends on what version. The last point at which it will probably
work very well is 1.3x. After that the formats for the job and config
XML diverged significantly.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Stuart Lorber
Sent: 12/18/2012 7:43 AM
To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Hudson to Jen
Another path would be to update your old Hudson server to a v1.39 (if you can)
since that is more compatible with Jenkins or even to install Hudson v1.39 on
your new box, migrate the jobs and then upgrade that new box to Jenkins.
If you have a lot of jobs to convert, it may be better to stay with Hudson.
In terms of how long Hudson will be around, you'd have to ask on the Hudson
mailing lists.
slide
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Fory Horio wrote:
> So, that's the best option here? Stay with Hudson? How much farther
>
So, that's the best option here? Stay with Hudson? How much farther
down the road do we have a support (updates) for Hudson?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Slide wrote:
> Yeah, that version of Hudson has a very different format for storing a lot
> of the config information in the xml files. Upg
Yeah, that version of Hudson has a very different format for storing a lot
of the config information in the xml files. Upgrading from Hudson 1.39 is
very easy, but the further away from that version you get, the less success
you are likely to have.
slide
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Fory Hori
We are running Hudson 2.2.1 on Ubuntu 10.10. I just grabbed the latest
Jenkins 1.483 installed on Ubuntu 12.04. Yes, I am using deb package. deb
http://hudson-ci.org/debian and http://pkg.jenkins-ci.org/debian/
On Friday, September 28, 2012 3:34:02 PM UTC-7, slide wrote:
>
> First, what version
First, what version of Hudson are you trying to migrate from? The formats
for the XML files diverged after a certain point l, which makes it very
difficult to migrate. Are you using the deb packaging?
Sent from my Windows Phone
--
From: Fory Horio
Sent: 9/28/2012 5:24 P
11 matches
Mail list logo
