If you're looking for corporate git, take a look at gerrit. I think it
addresses many of the concerns raised below.
On 11/03/2012, at 13:38, David Weintraub wrote:
> Git is not "better" than Subversion. Distributed version control is
> not "better" than centralized version control.
>
> Howev
That is an absolutely great summary !
-Original Message-
From: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Weintraub
Sent: Sunday, 11 March 2012 3:38 p.m.
To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Git vs SVN
Git is not "b
Git is not "better" than Subversion. Distributed version control is
not "better" than centralized version control.
However, that doesn't mean that Subversion is better or that
centralized is better. It's all about circumstances. There are many
circumstances where Git excels. I use Git as my person
Mark Waite
>
> From: Andrew Gray
>To: jenkinsci-...@googlegroups.com; jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 6:44 PM
>Subject: Git vs SVN
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>At one client site we are using SVN. Client is a big corpora
