Re: Use AdoptOpenJDK as JDK Tool download source

nicolas de loof writes: > but docker images seems to me a way better solution to cover the same > need, and this "tool installer" feature is just a hack-ish legacy we > should deprecate. Are you proposing to remove tool installer completely or is it about JDK tool installer only? If the former,

Re: Use AdoptOpenJDK as JDK Tool download source

I assume this would require a JEP ? Le mar. 26 févr. 2019 à 17:32, Slide a écrit : > +1 on deprecation > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:08 AM nicolas de loof > wrote: > >> I don't know if we have any metric for this purpose, but docker images >> seems to me a way better solution to cover the same

Re: Use AdoptOpenJDK as JDK Tool download source

+1 on deprecation On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:08 AM nicolas de loof wrote: > I don't know if we have any metric for this purpose, but docker images > seems to me a way better solution to cover the same need, and this "tool > installer" feature is just a hack-ish legacy we should deprecate. > > Le

Re: Use AdoptOpenJDK as JDK Tool download source

I don't know if we have any metric for this purpose, but docker images seems to me a way better solution to cover the same need, and this "tool installer" feature is just a hack-ish legacy we should deprecate. Le mar. 26 févr. 2019 à 15:44, Slide a écrit : > How many people use the automatic ins

Re: Use AdoptOpenJDK as JDK Tool download source

How many people use the automatic installation, is there a way to track that? Would it kill someone's usage model to remove this feature? It seems to me to be fairly unsustainable. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 06:22 Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hey Martijn, > > Thanks for chiming in. I already have comment

Re: Use AdoptOpenJDK as JDK Tool download source

Hey Martijn, Thanks for chiming in. I already have commented there in the JIRA, but asking here since it seems at this stage better suited in a discussion place: do you have an opinion/idea about whether, and how long, it will be tolerated that certain IPs download the same JDK binaries from adopt

role-Based strategy showing FullName next to userid ?

Hi, we have a Jenkins setup with RoleBased Strategy, using the CollabNet realm for Authorization. We have userid's (iso names) for login. These userid's are all very similar; 3 letters followed by 5 digits. After a while, having 50 or more userid's in the 'Assign Roles'table, it becomes very d

Re: Jenkins Plugin cannot get called from the pipeline with new syntax

Thanks Richard, I have defined the Symbol using @Symbol("TestUploader") annotation but it was not working. Now that I have changed the parameter of annotation to @Symbol("testUploader"), it is working with the following syntax. pipeline { agent any stages { stage('Build and R

Re: Resume my Multibranch Pipeline when a code review is submitted

Hi, I'm not sure if you've received any response, but I see two possible solutions: * create a separate job in Jenkins for these merges, subscribe to the "code review approved" events from Github and work from that * in the pipeline, create an "infinite loop" with some sensible upper limit (lik

Re: Unknown Workflow CPS Exceptions in Jenkins log

The warning message is misleading. That class intentionally does not have a data bound constructor. Refer to https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-54186 for more details. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:28 AM Sverre Moe wrote: > Any idea what the following Exceptions are caused by? > I have f

Unknown Workflow CPS Exceptions in Jenkins log

Any idea what the following Exceptions are caused by? I have found these in the Jenkins log. Feb 26, 2019 11:43:58 AM WARNING org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL invokeStep Error storing the arguments for step: checkout org.kohsuke.stapler.NoStaplerConstructorException: There's no @DataBound