Re: doskey support in "Execute Windows batch command" option.

2015-04-11 Thread corneil.duples...@gmail.com
AFAIK Jenkins will created a temporary batch file from the 'Execute Windows Commands' and just execute that and check the error level afterwards. The output is captured and becomes part of the build output. I don't think it is a matter of Jenkins recognizing the command. Create a batch file with s

Re: doskey support in "Execute Windows batch command" option.

2015-04-11 Thread Ankit Singhal
Anyone?? On Saturday, April 11, 2015 at 9:22:37 AM UTC+5:30, Ankit Singhal wrote: > > Hi All > > We have build script which sets a doskey for certain commands. > > Jenkins somehow is not able to recognize doskey: > > Problem is easily reproducible, > > *Script: foo.bat* > >

Re: How to enable JMX with Jenkins?

2015-04-11 Thread Daniel Beck
Java system properties (-Dsomething=foo) need to be set before the -jar argument. On 11.04.2015, at 17:28, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Hi. > > I would like to enable JMX with the Jenkins Java process but I seem to > get errors such as the following when I add any of the JMX options to > the "$JE

Re: Workflow plugin and Backslashes - script not recognizing path to maven on windows

2015-04-11 Thread ELIASSAL
Thanks Sir, it worked like a charm now. By the way, any idea fi I can find any documentation oe explanation about the "unarchive" step. I am not able to understand what the switch MAPPING can do as follows unarchive mapping: ['src.tar': '.', 'target/petclinic.war': 'petclinic.war'] In one tu

How to enable JMX with Jenkins?

2015-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hi. I would like to enable JMX with the Jenkins Java process but I seem to get errors such as the following when I add any of the JMX options to the "$JENKINS_ARGS" on a Linux machine startup: Running from: /usr/lib/jenkins/jenkins.war Exception in thread "main" java.lang.reflect.InvocationTarget

Re: java process consumes up to 200% CPU while using the UI

2015-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 11:31 -0400, Brent Atkinson wrote: > > You're right, but connecting locally should not require the remote ports > bound, No. You are right about that. But the problem is that the complaint is not isolated to the JMX report options. *Any* JMX option yields a complaint abou