Re: How to create a run object outside of a job?

You can pass the Jenkins instance as the context. Jenkins.get() On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 13:51, Michael Carter wrote: > The situation in a nut shell. I've got a validation behind a button that > calls a REST service to do the validation. So the validation is happening > outside any running jo

Re: timja would like to join Jenkins Infra's Hosting team

Hi I would like to join the hosting team ( https://www.jenkins.io/project/teams/hosting/#requesting-membership) I believe I meet all the requirements, and have been helping with it already in IRC / PRs Thanks Tim On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 15:36, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > +1 from me, maybe needs a mi

Re: GSoC 2020 Jenkins Custom Distribution Service Update Center Persistence Discussion

Could you have a background job that updates it every hour? On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 19:35, Sladyn Nunes wrote: > Hi all, > > This discussion thread pertains to the [GSoC 2020] Custom Distribution > Service Project feature implementation decision that the GsoC team would > like feedback on. Basic

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.235

I vote for 2.250, with some backporting needed. Thanks Tim On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 12:59, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > I would vote for 2.250. 2.250 has no functional difference from 2.249, > there is just one internal fix. 2.250 is a fancy number, so why not? > > 2.249/2.250 still have is

Re: Proposal - Expanding the DockerHub admins team

+1 On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 17:14, Matt Sicker wrote: > Sounds great! > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:06 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am planning to be on vacation in the beginning of September, likely > off the grid for some time. I would like to ensure that we have a good

buildPlugin() now with Warnings NG and GitHub checks

Hi all I’m happy to announce that the `buildPlugin()` library step that is used by almost all plugins on ci.jenkins.io now uses the Warnings NG plugin for static code analysis reporting and quality control. We have set default quality gate for: -

Re: pipeline-maven adoption

Adding Cyrille to cc On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:21, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Hi team, > > I would like to take ownership of the pipeline-maven plugin which is now > abandoned by his previous maintainers (Cyrille and Alvaro). > I am actively using this plugin and I know it very well (I worked w

Re: pipeline-maven adoption

FYI I got an out of office bounce from cyrille's email till August 24th On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:52, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Adding Cyrille to cc > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:21, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > >> Hi team, >> >> I would like to take ownership of

Re: pipeline-maven adoption

Hi Cyrille Yes we can take care of that. Arnaud can you send a PR to the permissions file and then we can get your access sorted out? Thanks Tim On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:42, Cyrille Le Clerc wrote: > Thanks Arnaud and Tim. > > With great pleasure Arnaud. I don't have bandwidth anymore to cont

JEP-224 and ExtendedRead - Time to graduate to GA?

Hi all Thoughts on graduating to GA: - Agent/ExtendedRead - Job/ExtendedRead - Overall/SystemRead GA would mean: - Enabled by default - Beta API restriction removed from Overall/SystemRead - Only weekly line affected for now, wouldn't be GA in LTS until the line after 2.249

Re: JEP-224 and ExtendedRead - Time to graduate to GA?

Minor correction matrix auth doesn't depend on the plugin and role strategy will no longer depend on it after https://github.com/jenkinsci/role-strategy-plugin/pull/139 is merged (Both have a minimum core of 2.222.x) On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 21:46, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Hi all > &g

Remoting help - CannotResolveClassException

Hi all, I'm currently working on pluggable storage for the Junit plugin It works properly in the junit plugin with the h2 database plugin as a mock implementation. When I try to implement it with the postgresql database plugin I'm getting CannotResolveClassException when I run it in pipeline. I

Re: Remoting help - CannotResolveClassException

ml and deserialise. Still would be interested if anyone knows: 1. how to make it work in this way 2. why it works for the h2 database in the junit plugin? Thanks Tim On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:04, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently working on pluggable storage for the Junit

Adopt database plugin request

Hi I would like to adopt https://plugins.jenkins.io/database/ I'm working on pluggable storage for the Junit plugin and would like to refresh the plugin and make some minor improvements. Thanks Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developer

Re: Forked repositories in GitHub

Hi Daniel Completely agree with this, I've accidentally submitted PRs to the wrong forks many times. Both because of GitHub CLI and also just the web UI picking the wrong one. For the record I've had GitHub support break the fork relationship from all the components that I maintain as far as I kn

Re: Move stable/jenkins kubernetes chart to jenkinci GitHub org

Hi Torsten We were just discussing this today on IRC strangely enough and I was planning to reach out to you about this. I take your point Gavin about there being issues with it but this helm chart has a lot of adoption and it’s best to improve what we have (and I’d be happy to help) The easiest

Re: Test Results (Junit) is there an entry method I can use over generating xml?

There's a very early version of pluggable storage available that you can use with a SQL backend instead of XML https://github.com/jenkinsci/junit-plugin/releases/tag/junit-1.32 https://github.com/jenkinsci/junit-plugin/issues/142 The API may change in incompatible ways, and it's not complete yet.

Re: Move stable/jenkins kubernetes chart to jenkinci GitHub org

Issues are open now, I've raised a few, @Gavin Mogan (or anyone else) your feedback here would be greatly appreciated https://github.com/jenkinsci/helm-charts/issues On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 23:39, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > For deploying we sh

ci.jenkins.io - maintainers can now re-run build via checks

Hi all Just an update to let you know that you can now re-run failed builds via GitHub checks on ci.jenkins.io. (Only maintainers, i.e. write access can do this, authors need to push a code change or close / reopen) This is made possible with the GitHub checks plugin

Re: Create plugins that require oracle jdbc diver

Hi Miguel I would recommend adding instructions to your plugin on how users can install it. The driver should be added to the $JENKINS_HOME/jdbc-drivers folder: https://github.com/jenkinsci/database-plugin/blob/bc188d0d9323a1e2b486dec41dde201cd19f6120/src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/database

Re: API to render links with RepositoryBrowser

I think it’s this: https://javadoc.jenkins.io/plugin/scm-api/jenkins/scm/api/metadata/ObjectMetadataAction.html On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 21:56, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > SCM plugins like the Git plugin show links to the changes in the hosted > repositories (e.g. to GitHub changes). > > Is there a ge

Re: Release Drafter convention for 'do not use this release' or 'known issues'

Hi Chris I'm not sure if it fits into release drafter, as it only updates drafts, as soon as you publish the release it won't be updated by the tool anymore. I assume you would never publish a knowingly broken release and it would only be known retroactively. What sort of convention are you think

Re: Release Drafter convention for 'do not use this release' or 'known issues'

release" (with corresponding emoji) and putting it in the > release-drafter.yml config, to ensure that nothing else uses it. > > Chris > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, at 5:11 PM, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers > wrote: > > I believe there is also a file in update ce

Re: API to render links with RepositoryBrowser

Can you use the ObjectMetadataAction? On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 19:46, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > Seems that I am getting from one problem to the next :-( > > RunWithSCM.html#getChangeSets returns a list of changes in the current > build. The links I want to create are commits that are not necessarily

Re: ci.jenkins.io - maintainers can now re-run build via checks

, which I hadn't seen before. Cool. >> >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 11:19, Manuel Ramón León Jiménez < >> manuelramon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Great, thank you for the heads up. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:55 AM Arnaud H

Re: Loading JenkinsRule from pre-defined xml files?

https://javadoc.jenkins.io/component/jenkins-test-harness/org/jvnet/hudson/test/recipes/LocalData.html It has method retention so I don't think it'll work on a field On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 15:01, Michael Carter wrote: > Any docs on how to get something like this working? > > @LocalData("Jenk

Re: [jenkins-infra] Re: ci.jenkins.io - maintainers can now re-run build via checks

GH Checks, which I hadn't seen before. Cool. >>>> >>> >>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 11:19, Manuel Ramón León Jiménez < >>>> manuelramon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great, thank you for the heads up. >>>>> >>

Re: Log4j2 logger not working for jenkins plugin

Can you post a link to the code? Or at least a new plugin generated off of archetypes where it doesn’t work for you? Thanks Tim On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 17:19, varun...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Matt, > all dependencies are as below: > > > > org.apache.httpcomponents > httpclient > 4.5.2 > > > >

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

2.263 is looking like the best option, so far no reports of issues in it. 2.263 was reverting / fixing the last of the major regressions in the previous versions. Thanks Tim On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 21:48, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I hope the today's 2.263 stabilizes the weekly release line: > http

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

y switched my test environment to Jenkins 2.263. I'll >> continue running in that environment. It is looking good so far. >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:59 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: >> >>> 2.263 is looking like the best option, so far no reports of issues

Re: Paying for Dockerhub pro plan

+1 On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:50, 'Olblak' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > The Dockerhub policy change start on Sunday unfortunately I couldn't make > significant progress on this. > Either by being sponsored by Docker or having a proper way to b

Re: Paying for Dockerhub pro plan

Fixing infra mailing list cc On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:57, Tim Jacomb wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:50, 'Olblak' via Jenkins Developers < > jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> Hi Everybody, >> >> The Dockerhub policy cha

Adopt Post Build Task Plugin

Hi I would like to adopt https://github.com/jenkinsci/postbuild-task-plugin/ Last adopted here https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-dev/c/0l0443e10hc but seems nothing was done on it. I just plan to deliver a fix for https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-64088 Thanks Tim -- You receiv

Re: Archiving jenkinsci/jenkins-ace-editor repo

+1 On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 11:29, fque...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed that the jenkins-ace-editor plugin is taken from the > https://github.com/jenkinsci/js-libs repo. That means the > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins-ace-editor is unused. I suggest > archiving it. > > An

Re: Proposal: Excluding JRebel support from the Jenkins core (JENKINS-64037)

Bin it On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 16:44, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Same question about > https://github.com/stapler/stapler-adjunct-zeroclipboard . It is a part > of the Jenkins core API and it "provides an easy way to copy text to the > clipboard using an invisible Adobe Flash >

Re: Jenkins 2.249.3 LTS RC testing started

Floating buttons on freestyle and multi branch jobs Clicking them adds more buttons On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 21:12, Amit Dar wrote: > Can you elaborate on what the symptoms are? > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:15 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:22 PM Daniel Beck wrote: >> > 2.2

Re: LTS schedule winter break

Is someone going to want to do an RC on 'Dec 30 - 2.263.2 RC' though? could we leave the RC date as the 16th and then release it on the 13th? (creating more RCs as needed if required) On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 13:25, Mark Waite wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 6:15 AM Baptiste Mathus wrot

Re: LTS schedule winter break

Well RC builds aren’t automated yet... On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 20:41, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I am pretty sure that our Release Automation infra would not mind to cut a > release on Dec 30, but there is still a lot of manual work involved in > cutting an LTS release. > I am +1 for postponing, espe

Re: Jenkins Jira migration has started

Good it's not just me, Daniel Beck has done some investigation and found that I still receive emails in the INFRA project but not the JENKINS project =/ On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 14:44, Mark Waite wrote: > We didn't intend to disable email notifications but others are reporting > the same result.

Re: Request using the certificate file of the official Jenkins Update Center

Why don’t the regular files work? Users should be directed to a Chinese mirror already, is it the distance to get the redirect? On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 14:02, Rick wrote: > Yes, we just need to change the URL of plugins. > > You mean generate two or more versions of update-cener.json files? For >

Re: Request using the certificate file of the official Jenkins Update Center

in-util-api.hpi > Via: 1.1 get.jenkins.io > > HTTP/2 200 > server: nginx/1.14.2 > date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:50:35 GMT > content-type: application/octet-stream > content-length: 613574 > last-modified: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:26:25 GMT > accept-ranges: bytes > > > &

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting, Nov 18, 2020

The time also means I cant attend, so +1 for reviewing another time On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 08:18, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > As discussed a few months ago, we will revise the meeting time once the > 2020 elections are over > Since we have candidates from APAC, the meeting approach may require > sign

Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

If it help the docs are recommending either 2.222 or 2.235 https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-development/choosing-jenkins-baseline/#currently-recommended-versions On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 17:30, Matt Sicker wrote: > Whichever LTS version you use should probably be kept up to date with

Re: Config round trip failures in plugin unit tests?

For the record commons-beanutils is provided by core at version 1.9.3 and it’s in the core bom. If it’s a transitive dep I would have thought the bom would have corrected the version, otherwise you can declare the dep without a version and scope provided and the bom should handle it On Sat, 28 No

Re: component javadoc in https://javadoc.jenkins.io/component/

Should be, If it's not a plugin it also needs updating in the javadoc repo, but it's already there for ATH: https://github.com/jenkins-infra/javadoc/blob/master/scripts/generate-javadoc-components.groovy#L8 On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 12:28, jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking for

Re: Core Baseline Java8 -> Java11?

I would be definitely +1 for switching defaults and encouraging people to use jdk11 And not against updating the minimum version, people will move when they have to. At my previous work we moved from 7 to 8 when we had to and it was no issue... We’ve been on 11 for awhile here... Java 8 is 6 ye

Re: Core Baseline Java8 -> Java11?

t;> >> >> its my understanding that most things should now compile with java 11, >> but not bumping the minimum version yet. >> >> >> >> Gavin >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:43 AM Ullrich Hafner >

Re: Add tentative LTS release dates for next baseline in Jenkins.io events calendar?

Sounds good to me I don't have any permissions on the calendar as far as I can see. Could someone add the dates please, and also grant me calendar permissions? Thanks Tim On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:44, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Hi all, > > (Possibly a question to Tim) > > Can we please consider

Backporting for LTS 2.263.2 started

Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for approximately 2020-12-17. Candidates: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?filter=12146 Fixed: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.263.2-fixed Rejected: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.263.2-rejected Thanks

Re: Add tentative LTS release dates for next baseline in Jenkins.io events calendar?

Daniel has granted On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:29, Mark Waite wrote: > +1 for Tim to be granted permission on the Jenkins calendar. > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:43 PM Tim Jacomb wrote: > >> Sounds good to me >> >> I don't have any permissions on the calend

Re: Add tentative LTS release dates for next baseline in Jenkins.io events calendar?

Added all to the calendar On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:52, Tim Jacomb wrote: > Daniel has granted > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 21:29, Mark Waite > wrote: > >> +1 for Tim to be granted permission on the Jenkins calendar. >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:43 PM Tim Jac

Re: [DISCUSS] Dependabot for Jenkins core (was:Re: Proposal: Automating dependency management for repositories inside the jenkinsci org)

I’m fine with adding more, We could also try a deny list too and see how it goes On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 00:01, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I am +1. We should finally move forward with Dependabot for dependencies > we considers safe and important to be kept up to date. Allow list is a good > way to g

Re: Discussion - Plugins reporting issue trackers

I would suspect there’s not many places where issues are enabled and not in use I’m fine with your proposed process Thanks Tim On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 07:38, Richard Bywater wrote: > Using the pom to explicitly point to where issue management is done seems > reasonable to me although I note f

Re: Discussion - Plugins reporting issue trackers

Agree tracking it in RPU is probably best On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:27, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > On 17. Dec 2020, at 07:53, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < > jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > 1) Overrides file > > 2) Issue Managemnet section in pom.xml ( > > https://maven.a

Jenkins 2.263.2 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2021-01-13. Please, report your findings in this thread. Download the release from https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/snapshots/org/jenkins-ci/main/jenkins-war/2.263.2-SNAPSHOT/jenkins-war-2.263.2

Re: Adopt database-mysql plugin request

gt;> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 17 Aug 2020, at 4:52 pm, Tim Jacomb wrote: >> >>  >> >> Hi >> >> I would like to adopt https://plugins.jenkins.io/database/ >> >> I'm working on pluggable storage for the Junit plugin and wou

Re: Request to be made maintainer for the Managed Scripts Plugin

Hi Jonathan This plugin is up for adoption, so we can go ahead with this now Can you create a pull request to https://github.com/jenkins-infra/repository-permissions-updater/blob/master/permissions/plugin-managed-scripts.yml with your Jenkins infrastructure account please? Thanks Tim On Thu, 1

Re: Discussion - Plugins reporting issue trackers

The way I work around that is by pressing t to go to file find mode and then typing the plugin name :) On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 23:52, Tim Van Holder wrote: > If tweaking and renaming RPU, maybe also tweak the directory structure? > > For example, changing > permissions/plugin-groovy-events-listen

Re: Please reassing plugins to Eficode

Hi Ewelina I extracted the components from the Jira API: https://issues.jenkins.io/rest/api/2/project/JENKINS/components ➜ Documents cat jenkins-components.json | jq '.[] | {name, lead: .lead.name}' | grep -B 1 "praqma" "name": "clearcase-plugin", "lead": "praqma" -- "name": "clearcase-ucm

Re: Hosting requests for similar projects

agree would be great if they could be merged and also the jenkins core (and winstone) CLI enhanced with a more modern CLI library On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 18:13, Slide wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Currently we have two hosting requests open ( > https://issues.jenkins.io/projects/HOSTING/issues/HOSTI

Re: LTS baseline selection for the successor of 2.249

gt; update (although I actually expected 2.264.x be next LTS, not sure why >> 2.263 was preferred). >> >> > Adding a new release to the plugin BOM is part of the new LTS release > checklist that is being developed by Tim Jacomb. See > https://github.com/jenkins-infra/rele

Re: Archive https://github.com/jenkinsci/stride-notification-plugin ?

Please merge the PR as well, GitHub doesn’t ignore archived repos in searches On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 20:54, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I'm 100% behind getting rid of plugins. > > Do you want to add it to update center's ignore list too? > https:

Re: Jenkins 3.x

Hello Few points > Marketing Definitely value in considering this, a 3.x and a big marketing push could bring some good attention to Jenkins, but do we have enough big changes to justify, possibly if we consider not just this LTS but other changes since 2.x. Some other stories worth highlighting

Re: 2.263.4 LTS release candidate

Hi Sorry we missed that with the regression fixes and the extra LTS release that was done this week Backporting hasn't started yet but will aim to have the RC out by Monday ish. Any help appreciated Thanks Tim On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 09:31, Beatriz Munoz wrote: > Hi all! > > Next LTS will be o

Jenkins 2.263.4 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2021-02-10 Please, report your findings in this thread. Download the release from https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/snapshots/org/jenkins-ci/main/jenkins-war/2.263.4-SNAPSHOT/jenkins-war-2.263.4-

Re: Jenkins LTS Baseline Selection

Hello Given there have been no objections to 2.277 let's take that one. The new bom line has been prepared and the 2 failures are now sorted, Acceptance tests are not in the best shape, any help here would be greatly appreciated. ~68 tests failed on th

Backporting for LTS 2.277.1 started

Hello everyone, Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for 2021-02-24. Candidates: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?filter=12146 Fixed: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.277.1-fixed Rejected: https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.277.1-rejected Tha

Re: Microsoft is going to retire Azure plugins?

I think it just means that Microsoft are going to stop 'officially' supporting them I assume someone else could adopt them On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:59, Mark Waite wrote: > New topic for the Jenkins infra team, planning the migration of > ci.jenkins.io from Azure cloud to another cloud provid

Re: github-scm-trait-notification-context-plugin contribution

Is this what you are after? https://github.com/jenkinsci/disable-github-multibranch-status-plugin On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 15:33, Kaloyan Dimitrov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I can contribute to the Github Custom Notification Context SCM Behaviour > plugin >

Re: Crawler: Reporting failures & merging PRs

Code owners could be added to automatically request review jenkins-infra/core and tools have access to merge there, you won’t be able to tag them though unless you’re a member of the org You can always ping in #jenkins-infra on freenode IRC I’ve merged the PR that you were referring to On Fri,

Re: Adopt msbuild

Just send a PR to RPU if it’s already up for adoption On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 09:09, Manuel Ramón León Jiménez < manuel.ramon.leon.jime...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have a PR to fix some PCT failures pending to merge in *msbuild* > plugin. The plugin is under adoption and I want to take over it

Jenkins 2.271.1 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2021-03-10. Please, report your findings in this thread. Download the release from https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/snapshots/org/jenkins-ci/main/jenkins-war/2.277.1-SNAPSHOT/jenkins-war-2.277.1

Re: Releasing tables-to-divs regression fixes for 2.277.1

> Approve releasing up-for-adoption plugins without taking ownership. +1 On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 19:14, 'Gavin Mogan' via Jenkins Developers < jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > if you do released un-maintained plugin, can you make sure the release > notes clearly indicate that its a non mai

Re: Table-to-div: how to build a layout in table-form

Could you be more specific on what looks better with a table? Table is fine for displaying data but it shouldn’t be used for layout of a form Generally things look fine if you change them to the standard controls rather than just trying to make it look the same. Otherwise you can use css to lay

Re: Proposal: Changing the Contributor License Agreement Process

> Do we want to change the policy and to require all contributors to sign CLA? It might be reasonable for the Jenkins core components, with assumption that we have an easy process and bots assisting with verification. I am not a huge fan of that, but this is how many projects operate. Please no, t

Re: Proposal: newsletter mailing list for contributor announcements

jenkins-dev-announce ? On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 13:53, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I would have been in favor of "jenkins-announcement" if it was a user > newsletter (which we could introduce as well). > In this case I am rather about contacting contributors specifically, and > I'd like to distinguish

Plugins that use CD for release - setup-java@v2

Hello Just a heads up if you're using https://www.jenkins.io/jep/229 for releasing your plugins automatically, and dependabot you will be getting a PR to update setup-java to v2. This has a breaking change and it won't be tested on CI if you're only using github actions for release. You will nee

Re: Deprecating ruby-runtime

> > > I'd start with a deprecation warning for ruby-runtime and all dependent > plugins pointing to the JEP or this thread (or, if you want to write it up, > a blog post), and if folks don't complain offer to take over > ruby-runtime maintainership in large enough numbers, we can suspend a few > we

Re: Proposal: Jenkins Core PR reviewers team

+1 On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 19:07, Mark Waite wrote: > +1 from me that Basil becomes part of the core PR reviewers team. > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:54 AM Basil Crow wrote: > >> I'm interested in joining the Core PR reviewers team as well. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are

Jenkins LTS baseline selection

Hello everyone, Please voice your opinion on which version should be our next core baseline. For me it looks like either 2.288 or 2.289 are the options 2.289 (being released today) includes a change for an upcoming firefox version so it would be good to get it in, but it hasn't had any weekly so

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

oose 2.288+, I'm happy :). >>>>> >>>>> Can you please confirm the expected timeline, so we can better assess >>>>> things? >>>>> Re-reading https://www.jenkins.io/download/lts/ we're looking at a .1 >>>>> 6 weeks from n

Re: LTS 2.277.4 RC

gt;> http://repo.jenkins-ci.org/snapshots/org/jenkins-ci/main/jenkins-war/2.277.4-SNAPSHOT >> >> Thanks Daniel Beck, Mark Waite and Tim Jacomb for the support! >> >> >> El 21 abr 2021, a las 12:08, Beatriz Munoz >> escribió: >> >> PR for backports:

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

We’ve been using it for over a year on java 11 and never hit an issue... I would rather drop java 8 as well On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 15:48, Jesse Glick wrote: > My opinion remains that if we believe Java 11 support is solid enough to > be the default, then we may as well keep things simple and dr

Re: Jenkins LTS baseline selection

2.289 is selected On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 16:25, Beatriz Munoz wrote: > Hi! > > So, is selected 2.289 or the discussion is still open? > > Thanks! > > El 24 abr 2021, a las 17:55, Tim Jacomb escribió: > > Agreed > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 14:25, Oleg Nenashev

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

It’s just down to defaults I think. We’ve seen the numbers rise as we changed the website and helm chart to use Java 11 by default On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 17:08, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:42 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > >> I am in favor of making JDK11 the default in all

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

Defaults and (people not seeing a need to change) Shipping an ‘admin monitor’ encouraging people to update would probably make a difference On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 17:18, Tim Jacomb wrote: > It’s just down to defaults I think. > > We’ve seen the numbers rise as we changed the website

Re: Jenkins Terminology cleanup continued - sub-terms for controllers

> "Serialization whetelist" for JEP-200 => "serialization permit list" Any thoughts on allow list rather than permit? Permit sounds a bit funny to me On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 15:59, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Based on the current feedback, the following terminology is suggested: > >- Master node =

Re: Jenkins Terminology cleanup continued - sub-terms for controllers

other projects, I've seen whitelist/blacklist moved to >>>>> allowlist/denylist, which *should* translate without context, I'd have >>>>> thought. permit/block would seem to be the other possible analog. >>>>> >>>>> Tony >>

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

+1000 On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 02:48, Denys Digtiar wrote: > > Posting here based on the discussion in @stapler/idea-stapler-plugin#44 > > > Stapler plugin for IntelliJ IDEA is currently listed under KK's account. > JetBrains added JetBrain

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

> If you want to join the org, please share your JetBrains Marketplace account IDs my email is my ID as far as I can tell On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 07:58, Denys Digtiar wrote: > > Maybe it makes sense to rename the plugin to "Jenkins plugin", Stapler > is not really used elsewhere. Having it as Jen

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

I see the board is the email contact, https://plugins.jetbrains.com/organizations/jenkins Is that an expected contact point? Would it be better to set the dev mailing list or infra? On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 08:41, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Added Tim and Kohsuke to the org. Everyone is admin for now.

Re: New BOM version 807.v6d348e44c987 seems out of step with the versioning pattern

Yes it's moved to CD releases https://www.jenkins.io/jep/229 https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom/issues/510 On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 11:59, Chris Kilding wrote: > Hi all, > > The new BOM version today is 807.v6d348e44c987. This seems quite out of > step with the previous versioning pattern - 27, 28,

Re: [jenkins-infra] Should we bring back wiki.jenkins.io?

Please no, wiki's suck for quality documentation. Anyone can put whatever rubbish they want there. On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 14:41, 'Olblak' via Jenkins Infrastructure < jenkins-in...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > During the last Infrastructure meeting >

Re: [jenkins-infra] Should we bring back wiki.jenkins.io?

What do other communities do for meetings notes? I think k8s is google docs. On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 17:37, Basil Crow wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 9:26 AM Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > As an example, I remember a contributor summit (FOSDEM 2020?) at which a > topic was discussed and nobody else

Re: Plugins using removed Guava APIs

scm-api done in https://github.com/jenkinsci/scm-api-plugin/pull/85 not released On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 03:40, Basil Crow wrote: > I started looking into which plugins use classes or methods from Guava > 11 that have been removed in Guava 30. There is plenty of low-hanging > fruit if anyone is i

Looking for release lead for 2.289.1

Hello Is anyone interested in being the release lead for 2.289.1? Planned dates can be seen on the event calendar: https://www.jenkins.io/events/#event-calendar Release candidate by 19th May Release on 2nd June The documentation is at: https://github.com/jenkins-infra/release/blob/master/.github

Re: New BOM version 807.v6d348e44c987 seems out of step with the versioning pattern

e merges a PR with an 'interesting label' like the 'enhancement' label On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 10:21, Ullrich Hafner wrote: > That means the maven enforcer will strike back unless all plugins use CD > ;-) The frequency of required updates will be an magnitude higher now… &

Re: Plugins using removed Guava APIs

FTR I've removed guava in all maintained azure plugins today (except azure-ad, needs a follow up to move to caffeine cache) Hopefully it's easy to generate your list again, is there a script? On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 11:09, jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > HI Basil, > > Apologies I said I was going to

Re: Plugins using removed Guava APIs

I see you used usage in plugins :) On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 11:14, Tim Jacomb wrote: > FTR I've removed guava in all maintained azure plugins today (except > azure-ad, needs a follow up to move to caffeine cache) > > Hopefully it's easy to generate your list again, is there a

Re: Plugins using removed Guava APIs

> remember is uses a PR not master of usage in plugins so it will find usage in libraries too! I merged usage in plugins this morning, so unless you need it released in some way you shouldn't need that On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 16:07, Basil Crow wrote: > Thank you for sharing this! I posted PRs for

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >