I see the same issue with maven-plugin - the OWNERS file is there, but the
health probe fails
https://plugins.jenkins.io/maven-plugin/healthscore/#:~:text=Repository%20would%20benefit%20from%20defining%20the%20code%20ownership.
On Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 1:27:46 PM UTC+3 bma...@gmail.com wrote:
Please no, let's not rename this way with -plugin-plugin. It would be very
weird, and does not sound like a correct fix :).
Seems like this case works OK for https://github.com/jenkinsci/maven-plugin
though?
Le mar. 30 juil. 2024 à 12:17, Victor Balakine a écrit :
> Thank you, Tim! Then I just
Thank you, Tim! Then I just have to wait for the next scan of the
global-build-stats plugin.
Back to the jenkins-multijob-plugin plugin then. Is this artifactId not
following the convention?
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins-multijob-plugin/blob/master/pom.xml#L10C14-L10C37
Renaming the artif
Hi
That’s normal, artifact ids are normally the repo name with -plugin dropped
and team names are normally repo name + -developers
Cheers
Tim
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 06:21, Victor Balakine wrote:
> Another plugin I maintain has the same issue -
> https://github.com/jenkinsci/global-build-stats-p
Another plugin I maintain has the same issue
- https://github.com/jenkinsci/global-build-stats-plugin
The artifactId is `global-build-stats`, but the repo name is
`global-build-stats-plugin` and the team name is
`global-build-stats-plugin-developers`.
I would really appreciate if someone with hi
Thank you! I creaded the
issue https://github.com/jenkins-infra/plugin-health-scoring/issues/531
On Saturday, July 27, 2024 at 11:51:19 AM UTC+3 mc.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've renamed the repository and team accordingly. But this should probably
> be tracked as an issue in
> https://
Hi,
I've renamed the repository and team accordingly. But this should probably
be tracked as an issue
in https://github.com/jenkins-infra/plugin-health-scoring/issues, if you
would be so kind and create one.
~ Alex
On Friday 26 July 2024 at 15:00:03 UTC+2 sgm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
