Controllers would make more sense, I don't think I have enough knowledge
about the agents
'Bruno Verachten' via Jenkins Developers
schrieb am Di., 4. Feb. 2025, 19:05:
> I thought I had understood you were targeting all the other controllers in
> the same network, not the agents. 🤔
>
> On Tue, F
I thought I had understood you were targeting all the other controllers in
the same network, not the agents. 🤔
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, 18:58 Alex Earl wrote:
> My understanding is that agents do not download plugins at all, the
> plugins only reside on the controller.
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 10:
My understanding is that agents do not download plugins at all, the plugins
only reside on the controller.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 10:56 AM Phillipp Glanz
wrote:
> To explain the point better,
> If you have a controller node and multiple agents, the current flow seems
> to be that after a plugin
To explain the point better,
If you have a controller node and multiple agents, the current flow seems
to be that after a plugin install. All nodes download the plugins directly
from jenkins.io. From my point of view, it would make more sense to get
them from the controller node if this node al
What would be the consumer(s) of this cache? Other controller(s) in
the same network? The generic caching functionality of something like
Artifactory might be a better fit for this use case.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 1:26 AM Phillipp Glanz wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> my name is Phillipp, I was at the
