support?
Thanks
lude
Nobody here, who is using spring-modules?
On 11/1/06, lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
while starting a new project we are thinking about using the
spring-modules for working with lucene. See:
https://springmodules.dev.java.net/
Does anybody has experience with this higher level
Hello,
sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere:
1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version 1.4.3 and 2.0?
2.) Is it possible to use the old Luke-Tool with a new lucene 2 index?
Thanks
lude
eleased on Feb 2005?
lude
On 7/18/06, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Mardi 18 Juillet 2006 20:53, lude a écrit:
> Hello,
>
> sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere:
>
> 1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version 1.4.3 and
>
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a écrit:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> thanks for answering
attachments:
1 x email_id, subject, sender_address, to_address, message_text
0..n x email_id, attachment_name, attachment_content
Disadvantage:
At query time it is difficult to aggregate the documents that belongs to
each other. One hit per email (including attachments) should be shown.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
lude
index mulitpart bodys (== more then one
file-attachment)?
One lucene-document for each part (==file)?
How do you handle the queries?
Greetings
lude
On 8/15/06, John Haxby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lude wrote:
> does anybody has an idea what is the best design approch for realizing
&
Hi Dejan,
how do you query for email- and(!) attachment-documents,
if you just want to present one hit per email (even if the searchterm
matches
in the email- and(!) in the corresponding attachment-document)?
Thanks
lude
On 8/15/06, Dejan Nenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The approac
'subject'
'Abstract of the message-text'
2. mail-2 'subject'
Attachment with name 'filename.doc' contains 'Abstract of
file-content'
Another Use-Case would be an extended search, which allows to select if
"attached files"
should be searched (yes or no).
Greetings
lude
:
- I create an IndexModifier
- The applicaton crashes
- There exists a write-lock on the index
--> Next time I start the application the IndexModifier couldn't be opened
because of the locks.
What is the right way to check and delete old write locks?
Thanks
lude
7;s a litte performance. But it ensures that
1.) The change is visible immediately
2.) The write.lock (and commit.lock) doesn't remain when the application
shut down or crashes
On 8/20/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/20/06, lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Ok, you've got me! ;)
How do you assure that your IndexModifier (or IndexWriter/IndexReader)
is closed, when your application ends.
Or do you always use a IndexReader.unlock(Directory dir) at startup-time of
your application.
Thanks!
lude
On 8/21/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Andrzej,
a month ago you mentioned a new Lucene 2.0 compatible Version of luke.
Does it exist somewhere?
Thanks
lude
On 7/20/06, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lude wrote:
>> As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
>
> Where did you get this informatio
#x27;t work (no documents are found).
Greetings
lude
x?
Thanks lude
On 9/4/06, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 22:32 +0200, lude wrote:
> How do you have to define the query-string to get all documents of an
index
> be returned by using the QueryParser?
> In theory a query like 'NOT word_not_in_ind
future?
Thanks
lude
take these stored values for
sorting
Wouldn't it?
Greetings
lude
On 9/23/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: for years there is the discussion to make lucene able to sort on
TOKENIZED
: fields.
really? .. i've only been on the list since 1.4.3 but i don
17 matches
Mail list logo
