weird error with SVN of Lucene

17505/lucene/java/trunk' svn: REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/bc/417505/lucene/java/trunk': 400 Bad Request (http://svn.apache.org ) make: *** [lucene-java-2.0.0-417135] Error 1 I can CO PyLucene, but I can't Lucene. Can you? Thanks for answering such foolish question.

Re[2]: weird error with SVN of Lucene

or update it for 2 hours... can you perform updates or COs? -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[3]: weird error with SVN of Lucene

about your SVN client? CH> -Hoss CH> - CH> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CH> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Yura Smo

ParallelMultiSearcher and docFreq

Maybe I am not correct, then please tell me whats wrong. Thanks. -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ParallelMultiSearcher and docFreq

arch time. YS> I see that we have docFreqs method for RemoteSearchable, but it has YS> not being used. YS> Is there any way to get rid of those multiple calls of docFreq? -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ ---

Re[2]: ParallelMultiSearcher and docFreq

an avoid the 'call HRCLD> per Term' per remote and just make a single docFreq call per remote. HRCLD> You might have to extend the ParallelMultiSearcher and create a threaded HRCLD> docFreq method. -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ -

ParallelMultiSearcher

Hello, java-user. Does anyone here uses ParallelMultiSearcher for searching big arrays of data? I have some questions about PrefixQuery search.. Thanks in advance. -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ - To

Re[2]: ParallelMultiSearcher

his question for users mail list. But I have spent about 3 days to fix this problem and I do not see any solution. Maybe developers of Lucene could suggest something... Thanks and sorry for my bad English. -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.

Re[4]: ParallelMultiSearcher

r has eliminated counting idf's.. I wonder why it is not inside of Lucene yet :) -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

how to enhance speed of sorted search

ons to score documents using query. Is there any way to speed up queries? Maybe should I replace query with filter? The problem that I have very big index, like 80 Gb and I have a lot of different queries (about 480 per minute). -- Yura Smolsky --

Re[2]: how to enhance speed of sorted search

tions to score documents MAENN> using query. MAENN> Is there any way to speed up queries? Maybe should I replace query with MAENN> filter? MAENN> The problem that I have very big index, like 80 Gb and I have a lot of MAENN> different queries (about 480 per minute). MAENN> -- MAEN

Re[3]: how to enhance speed of sorted search

han usual search IndexSearcher.search( query, sortByIntField) Is there anyway I could use filter to get needed results from the query? -- Yura Smolsky, http://altervisionmedia.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[4]: how to enhance speed of sorted search

orted query take for you right now? it takes 0.2 up to 0.4. this is only searching without iterating over hits and fetching docs. CH> how many documents are in your index? about 30 millions CH> how many matches do you typically have? it varies

highlighter and phrase search

irst result does not need to be highlighted b/c requested keyword was "A B". Is this a bug or I do not understand something? Yura Smolsky. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

exact match

Doe" or "John Foo". Any ideas? Yura Smolsky. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: exact match

Hello, Erik. EH> On Apr 4, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Yura Smolsky wrote: >> Hello, java-user. >> >> I have documents with tokenized, indexes and stored field. This field >> contain one-two words usually. I need to be able to search exact >> matches for two words. &g

Re[4]: exact match

ll combinations with word John and I just want to have documents with the word "John" only. Solution might not simple, but I can manage that. I cannot manage reindexing all documents again. :) Does it clear to you? EH> On Apr 5, 2005, at 5:44 AM, Yura Smolsky wrote: >> EH> On Apr 4,

Re[2]: Search performance under high load

em with a MoreLikeThis or simply mh> limit the number of allowed terms in the query string. Can you please explain what is "MoreLikeThis" query in the Lucene? Yura Smolsky. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR