to remove any words (or so I believe).
How can I achieve a StandardAnalyzer where every word in the query is
significant?
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Strange-StopFilter-and-stop-words-b
How can I use Lucene Java to search for words containing accents or umlauts
such as Hürthle, Sézary or Waldenström? I don't get any matches when I use
the plain characters without accents. Is it a configuration issue?
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4720
Thanks, ASCIIFoldingFilter works well.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-for-words-containing-accents-or-umlauts-tp3244774p3259979.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
text where processing of the slashes and dashes in this manner is probably
expected and desirable. I guess if I turn off this default behaviour then I
will lose it for normal words but that is probably acceptable and
unavoidable.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
is document? I am using
StandardAnalyzer and QueryParser at the moment in Lucene Java 3.2.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-behaviour-with-content-containing-decimal-points-tp3276878p3276878.html
Sent from the Lucene -
Can anyone help me with this? Do you require further information? This has
become a serious issue for us.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-behaviour-with-content-containing-decimal-points-tp3276878p3285423.html
Sent from the Lucene
o getting such a query to match this document? I am
> using StandardAnalyzer and
> QueryParser at the moment in Lucene Java 3.2.
I have included the previous post as I realise not everyone accesses this
content via the web.
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nab
cal results and the highlighter would tell me that the word
/*Alzheimer's*/ needs to be highlighted in both cases for that document.
Is this possible? What's the best way of implementing this?
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-igno
nd in both cases the highlighter would
indicate that the word /*Alzheimer's*/ needs to be highlighted in the
displayed content.
Is this possible? What's the best way to achieve this? I am using Lucene
3.2 with StandardAnalyzer and QueryParser at present.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this messa
nd in both cases the highlighter would
indicate that the word /*Alzheimer's*/ needs to be highlighted in the
displayed content.
Is this possible? What's the best way to achieve this? I am using Lucene
3.2 with StandardAnalyzer and QueryParser at present.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this messa
nd in both cases the highlighter would
indicate that the word /*Alzheimer's*/ needs to be highlighted in the
displayed content.
Is this possible? What's the best way to achieve this? I am using Lucene
3.2 with StandardAnalyzer and QueryParser at present.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this messa
Each time I posted I received a "500 Internal Server Error" message and
assumed that the post had not been accepted. Obviously this was not the
case!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Apologies-for-the-multiple-posts-tp3328645p3328645.html
Sent from the Lucene -
fragments
and this is a serious problem. Is that because the highlighter looks for
the sanitised tokens in the text instead of the raw tokens?
Perhaps your solution would not have this problem but I am unsure how to
implement it.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
finduced" to be indexed.
How would I go about implementing this? We use Lucene Java 3.2.
Thanks,
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Enabling-indexing-of-hyphenated-terms-sans-the-hyphen-tp3350008p3350008.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java
> Solr's WordDelimiterFilterFactory does what you want.
Thanks Steve, that's exactly what I was looking for and it is now working.
-sbs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Enabling-indexing-of-hyphenated-terms-sans-the-hyphen-tp3350008p3353208.html
ch but instead I get "sensitisation" and not
"appendicitis". If I remove the PorterStemFilter then things behave as I
would have expected and desired.
Why is this happening? Is there a way to apply a PorterStemFilter and still
be able to use wildcards?
I am using Lucene
I am applying the PorterStemFilter at both indexing and search time.
As for schema, I have 3 fields: title, subtitle and notes. When the user
enters a query string of */a*itis/*, my software turns this into an actual
Lucene query of */title: a*itis OR subtitle: a*itis OR notes: a*itis/* and I
get
rStemFilter from my custom analyzer (which I use at both indexing and
> search time) then I get the results I want (albeit I lose the other
> functionality which I also need).
I hope that's a bit clearer. Any ideas to explain and/or resolve this?
Thanks,
-s
18 matches
Mail list logo