I am studying a solution which uses lucene replicator components (I'm on
lucene 4.10.4) and I've found some documentation on the javadoc and in some
blog posts.
When my IndexWriter commits it produces a Revision which is sent to the
ReplicationClient.
To be sure of keeping data untill the replica
ef the files that still need to be copied.
>
> I'm using this feature now and it's working quite well.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Riccardo Tasso
> wrote:
>
>> I am studying a solutio
Hi,
I have recently read this post, I think it will give you some hint:
http://blog.trifork.com/2011/11/21/simon-says-optimize-is-bad-for-you/
Probably the only advantage of having one huge segment is to use less disk
space.
Riccardo
2017-06-14 5:23 GMT+02:00 Tom Hirschfeld :
> Hello Fellow L
2017-06-14 19:20 GMT+02:00 Uwe Schindler :
> You also lose the ability to parallelize searches with an Executor on
> IndexSearcher!
How can you say that? Isn't true that multiple reader can access
concurrently on the same segment?
Hi,
I am not aware of any lucene integration with rdbms but I don't think it
would be very usefull, what do you mean with "guideline for using Lucene
with Database"?.
Sometimes it makes sense a database integration with lucene (for example
Neo4J and OrientDB use lucene as one of their indexing en
2017-12-28 6:35 GMT+01:00 Kumar, Santosh :
>
> While looking up for examples of fuzzy search with Lucene, I came across
> examples that demonstrate Lucene with file system predominantly, so was
> wondering if there are any samples on ‘How to use Lucene with DB’ or if the
> Java logic remains same f
Hello,
I'm porting an application from lucene 4 to lucene 7.
I've converted a field from IntField to IntPoint and at query or indexing
time everything is ok.
When I call the method:
reader.getSumTotalTermFreq(field);
it returns zero for my IntPoint field. I understand that IntPoint is stored
i
mer. 28 févr. 2018 à 21:47, Riccardo Tasso a
> écrit :
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm porting an application from lucene 4 to lucene 7.
> >
> > I've converted a field from IntField to IntPoint and at query or indexing
> > time everything is ok.
> >
>
For DocValues my question doesn't make sense, since there is no inverted
index for those fields.
Another edge case is the stored only field. Also for this one I think no
count could be provided by lucene.
Riccardo
2018-03-01 19:52 GMT+01:00 Riccardo Tasso :
> Thanks, probably for DocVal
Hi,
in the past year I worked on a side project which helped me both for
learning lucene and for making my life easier exploring remote indexes.
It is called leila, since it's inspired by luke, and it's available under
Apache Licence on github: https://github.com/raymanrt/leila
Leila is designed
Hello everybody,
I have a (very big) lucene 4 index with documents using IntField. On that
field, which should be stored and sortable, I should search and execute
range queries.
I've tried to upgrade it from 4 to 7 with IndexUpgrader but I observed that
IntFields aren't searchable anymore.
Which
will not even open an index that
> has _ever_ been touched by Lucene 6x, no matter what intervening steps
> have been taken. Or in general, Lucene/Solr X will not open indexes
> touched by X-2, starting with 8x rather than behave unexpectedly.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > O
not even open an index that
> has _ever_ been touched by Lucene 6x, no matter what intervening steps
> have been taken. Or in general, Lucene/Solr X will not open indexes
> touched by X-2, starting with 8x rather than behave unexpectedly.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Jun
Hi,
I'm running a lucene based application on a linux system.
The application writes and read many lucene indexes under the same
directory, which doesn't contain other data.
We are monitoring the indexes directory and we noticed that the disk usage
as calculated by the df util grows more rapidly
14 matches
Mail list logo
