Replication of RAMDirectory across multiple WebSphere servers

Does anybody have any experience with setting up a Lucene RAMDirectory index for replication across multiple WebSphere servers and taking advantage of WebSphere's built-in Object Cache? We are currently re-building/refreshing from the source the entire RAMDirectory index on each WebSphere server

Lock error attempting update of RAMDirectory index

I'm getting the following error trying to instantiate an IndexModifier on a RAMDirectory index: java.io.IOException: Lock obtain timed out: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java(Compiled Code)) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.(IndexWriter.java:2

Re: Lock error attempting update of RAMDirectory index

ently, there is more to it than that. Also, this doesn't happen consistently -- just occasionally. Thanks. karl wettin-3 wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:24 -0700, Philip Brown wrote: >> >> I'm getting the following error trying to instantiate an IndexMo

Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Hi, After running some tests using the StandardAnalyzer, and getting 0 results from the search, I believe I need a special Tokenizer/Analyzer. Does anybody have something that parses like the following: - doesn't parse apart phrases (in quotes) - doesn't parse/separate hyphentated or underscore

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Do you mean StandardTokenizer.jj (org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard)? I'm not seeing StandardAnalyzer.jj in the Lucene source download. Mark Miller-5 wrote: > > Philip Brown w

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Thanks, but I don't "think" I need that. But curious, how will it know it's a phrase if it's not enclosed in quotes? Won't all its terms be treated separately then? Philip Mark Miller-5 wrote: > > One more tip...if you would like to be able to search phrases without > putting in the quotes

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Well, I tried that, and it doesn't seem to work still. I would be happy to zip up the new files, so you can see what I'm using -- maybe you can get it to work. The first time, I tried building the documents without quotes surrounding each phrase. Then, I retried by enclosing every phrase within

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

he definiton to the TOKEN section, but below that you will > find the grammer...you need to add to the grammer. If you look > how > and are done you will prob see what you should do. If > not, my machine should be back up tomarrow... > > - Mark > > On 9/1/06, Philip Brown

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

definiton to the TOKEN section, but below that you will > find the grammer...you need to add to the grammer. If you look > how > and are done you will prob see what you should do. If > not, my machine should be back up tomarrow... > > - Mark > > On 9/1/06, Philip Brown

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

arching on other fields.) What do you think? Philip Erick Erickson wrote: > > OK, I've gotta ask. Have you examined your index with Luke to see if what > you *think* is in the index actually *is*??? > > Erick > > On 9/1/06, Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

t;> and that combines the functionality of >> LetterTokenizer, >> >> >> LowerCaseTokenizer, >> >> >> WhitespaceTokenizer, >> >> >> StopFilterinto >> >> >> a single efficient multi-purpose class.>>> >&

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

h("iamunderscored", 0); > scratch.doSearch("underscored", 0); > > scratch.doSearchPhrase("this is the test text", 1); > scratch.doSearchPhrase("text with hyphenated-iamhyphenated", > 1); > s

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Thanks for your input. I'm sure I could do as you suggest (and maybe that will end up being my best option), but I had hoped to use a string for creating the query object, particularly as some of my queries are a bit complex. Thanks. Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > I haven't really been followi

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Yeah, they are more complex than the "exactish" match -- basically, there are more fields involved -- combined sometimes with AND and sometimes with OR, and sometimes negated field values, sometimes groupings, etc. These other field values are all single words (no spaces), and a search might invo

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

So, if I do as you suggest below (using PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper with StandardAnalyzer) then I still need to enclose in quotes the phrases (keywords with spaces) when I issue the search, and they are only returned in the results if the case is identical to how it was added? (This seems to be what

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

Here's a little sample program (borrowed some code from Erick Erickson :)). Whether I add as TOKENIZED or UN_TOKENIZED seems to make no difference in the output. Is this what you'd expect? - Philip package com.test; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.HashSet; import java.util.regex.

Re: Phrase search using quotes -- special Tokenizer

D it will still work. > > > do you have na example of something that *isn't* working the way you want? > ... if not i don't see what your problem is, all your tests are passing :) > > > : Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:06:13 -0700 (PDT) > : From: Philip Brown <[EMAIL