Hi all,
I was wanting to use the 4.1 version to access some of the latest
improvements, I was hoping to just connect to the maven snapshot
repository but it seems that they are not being updated as they are
from October 24/25. Is this a deliberate policy or a "bug", and any
chance of a fi
Despite the poo-pooing of Maven I would be keen for the nightly builds to be
release to the apache repository. This will have the advantage that those lazy
Maven users who cannot be bothered to do their own repository maintenance
(shame on me) will quickly be able to test the latest code and rep
Hi all,
I run my code on a cluster where I have to preset resource limits and therefore
the processes have limited virtual memory causing OOME when using MMapDirectory
on large indexes.
This means I explicitly use NIOFSDirectory (i.e. Directory indexDirectory =
NIOFSDirectory.open(indexFile);)
Thanks for that, I had not realised that the open method was simply inherited
from the FSDirectory, I should have read the docs.
However, it makes no sense to me that a call to NIOFSDirectory.open() can end
up opening a MMapDirectory, and in general that a call to one subclass can end
up openin
Hi Uwe,
Unfortunately my IDE (Intellij) does not warn me about calling a static method
on a different class name, a nice idea I shall request the feature.
Anyway, my suggestion to avoid the confusion still holds; that the FSDirectory
open method is overridden in the subclasses, thus "NIOFSDire
Hi,
I would like to be able to display up to multiple millions of lat/lng
points on a map, to make this possible my intention is to plot less
than 1000 clusters of points by dividing the world into a grid tree
and I'm looking into using GeohashPrefixTree to do this.
I am imagining that I
Wow, that's exactly what I'm talking about, and a very cool demonstration.
Unfortunately the mapping in my system is part of a faceted browsing over
the Solr/Lucene data set and so I cannot see your propriety web-based system
working for me, as I would need to connect to my indexes. However via yo
I've also just found
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11319465/geoclusters-in-solr where David
Smiley suggests using one field to store the levels (with a prefix) rather
than different fields.
N
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-GeohashPrefixTree-for-m
Another stumbling block...
I want to be able to return those lat,lng values within the current map
viewport/window. This relates to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4#Sorting_and_Relevancy,
here it states "A common spatial requirement is to sort the search results
by distanc
Hi all,
I am copying documents from a source index to another (and adding more
fields), all the fields are indexed and stored.
I'm basically doing...
for (int docNum = 0; docNum < maxDoc; docNum++)
{
Document doc = indexReader.document(docNum);
doc.add(new Field1...);
doc.add(new Field
Thanks for the reply.
I don't understand why I cannot "read an existing document,... and add
it to an existing or new index".
I understand this wouldn't work for fields which are not stored, I
also understand that I am responsible for making sure the tokenizers
and analyzers are the same,
Hi Uwe,
Thank you for the clarification, knowing that I will have to shuffle my code
accordingly.
N
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexed-numeric-fields-return-indexed-false-tp4059139p4059408.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at
12 matches
Mail list logo