Thank you so much for the quick response guys. Got it working. I had to add
two more jars along with lucene-core-4.0.0.jar. Thanks again.
Regards,
Mohammad Tariq
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:48 PM, BIAGINI Nathan wrote:
> Le 04/12/12 16:06, Mohammad Tariq a écrit :
>
> H
I can. :)
Thank you all.
Regards,
Mohammad Tariq
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Yann-Erwan Perio wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Mohammad Tariq wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Thank you so much for the quick response guys. Got it working. I had to
> add
> > two more j
beneficial. Is there any
other good resource which could help a beginner like me(And based on
Lucene-4.0.0)?
Thank you.
Regards,
Mohammad Tariq
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Mohammad Tariq wrote:
> Hello Yann-Erwan,
>
> That might be a reason or perhaps something was mi
Thank you for the tip Ian.
Regards,
Mohammad Tariq
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> Read Lucene in Action. The fundamental concepts and techniques haven't
> changed. You can keep a copy of the release notes and migration
> guides for later ve
ds ending being tens of
> thousands, or more.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Mohammad Tariq
> wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have a scenario wherein I need an in-memory index as I need
> > faster search. The p
ory*? I have to run the entire
process everytime I want to search something.
Also, I have added a dot(.) before and after after each word before adding
it to the document so that I can do *exact match search*. Is my approach
correct or is there any other OOTB feature available in Lucene whi
, you'll need to reload on startup. You don't have to recreate for
> each search though - create and populate the RAMDirectory on startup
> and create an IndexSearcher and use that for all searches.
>
> Depending on your app it might be easier to use a normal disk based
>
A"?
> Sounds surprising.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mohammad Tariq
> wrote:
> > Thanks again Ian. I'll make the changes suggested by you. And I am using
> > dots because if I search for 'AA' it was g
