Re: AW: Boolean OR does not work as described

2012-01-03 Thread Michael-O
Anna Hunecke schrieb: Hi Mike, I think the problem is grouping. If you have a query A AND B OR C, it will be grouped as A AND (B OR C) and not as you expected as (A AND B) OR C. Just put parentheses in your query and you get the result that you want. Hi Anna, This is it but the documentation

Re: Boolean OR does not work as described

2012-01-03 Thread Michael-O
Chris Hostetter schrieb: : if you want to mix and/or in one query, always use parenthesis. The or better yet, train yourself not to use AND, OR and NOT... http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/ Thanks for the blog entry. I will read through that! ---

Re: Boolean OR does not work as described

2012-01-03 Thread Michael-O
Hi Uwe, Uwe Schindler schrieb: Hi Mike, if you want to mix and/or in one query, always use parenthesis. The operator precedence is strange with the default query parser. In contrib there is another one (called PrecedenceQueryParser) that can handle this but is incompatible with existing queries

How to correctly use SearcherManager#close?

2012-11-01 Thread Michael-O
Hi folks, while I do understand the workflow with this class, I do not understand when to call close(). The JavaDoc is not crystal clear on that. Am I supposed to call this method after release() or when my webapp is destroyed? Thanks, Michael -

Re: How to correctly use SearcherManager#close?

2012-11-01 Thread Michael-O
http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > while I do understand the workflow with this class, I do not understand > when to call close(). The JavaDoc is not crystal clear on that.

Re: How to correctly use SearcherManager#close?

2012-11-02 Thread Michael-O
> That would be great! > > Hmm which version are you looking at? In 4.0 it currently says this: > > /** >* Close this ReferenceManager to future {@link #acquire() acquiring}. > Any >* references that were previously {@link #acquire() acquired} won't be >* affected, and they should

Re: How to correctly use SearcherManager#close?

2012-11-02 Thread Michael-O
> hey michael, > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Thanks for the quick response. Any chance this could be clearer in the > JavaDoc of this class? > > sure thing, do you wanna open an issues / create a patch I am happy

Excessive use of IOException without proper documentation

2012-11-02 Thread Michael-O
Hi, why does virtually every method (exaggerating) throw an IOE? I know there might be a failure in the underlying IO (corrupt files, passing checked exc up, etc) but 1. Almost none of the has a JavaDoc on it 2. Throwing an IOE from most of the methods doesn't really help. You cannot create se

Re: Excessive use of IOException without proper documentation

2012-11-04 Thread Michael-O
r 9: http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/programming/java/9780137150021 Am 2012-11-02 22:27, schrieb Simon Willnauer: Hey, On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: Hi, why does virtually every method (exaggerating) throw an IOE? I know there might be

Re: Excessive use of IOException without proper documentation

2012-11-04 Thread Michael-O
omplicating the exceptions throwing mechanism. I definitively will. As I always do with OSS. On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: Hi Simon, there are generally two very good resources how exceptions should be handled in Java. I will quote both: 1. Oracle&#