On the link
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/queryparsersyntax.html#Range%20Searches
There is ranged searched, how do I specify everything above a date from date
20020101 to end of time?
Next, I am temporarily using lucene in a noSQL solution(to switch to Solr later
after prototype) and
performant.
Should I just use 2.9 instead? But then 3.x doesn't seem to support this?
Thanks,
Dean
From: Hiller, Dean x66079
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:29 AM
To: 'java-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: how to do simple search paging results of 100 each? and query syntax
questi
"It supports it like 2.9, but not using the Hits API. As described above, to
show results 991 to 1000 request the top-1000 results and display the last
10 :-)"
Bear with me as I am little confused so let me throw some stuff down here and
think out loud...
So, I basically have to request the top 1
I have a JUnit test case so I can demonstrate Lucene to myself. It correctly
returns a hit count of 2 but then when I get the docs, there is only ONE, and I
can't seem to get the info on the 2nd hit at all. Notice my logs print 2 and 1
if you run this example on the counts...
getTotalHits = 2
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to do simple search paging results of 100 each? and query
syntax question
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> On the link
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/queryparsersyntax.html#Range%20Searches
>
>
> There is range
yet. I am sure people well just as ScrollableResultSet was
eventually added into hibernate.
Thanks,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 1:48 PM
To: Hiller, Dean x66079
Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
11:48 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to do simple search paging results of 100 each? and query
syntax question
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> On the link
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/queryparsersyntax.html#Range%20Searches
>
title, Field.Store.NO,
Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED));
document.add(new Field("date", dateTxt, Field.Store.NO,
Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED));
log.info("created doc=" + dateTxt + " entry+" + url);
document.add(new Field("url", url,
se of that. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: Hiller, Dean x66079
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 4:37 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: ranged query didn't work, got exception...
Swt, * worked, but SHUCKS.query completely returns no results. I don
: Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:00 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: ranged query didn't work
On 6/19/2011 8:11 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079 wrote:
> Oddly, enough, this seems to work and I get one result calling
> Collector.collect(int docIt)...(I found out AND has to be caps)...
>
ich may be appropriate to your problem...
Best
Erick
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> "It supports it like 2.9, but not using the Hits API. As described above, to
> show results 991 to 1000 request the top-1000 results and display the last
> 10 :-)"
&
at collected as many documents as
you ever want to return and then you can use that list to "page". But
that requires
a stateful connection, which may be appropriate to your problem...
Best
Erick
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> "It supports it li
I would like to skip creating the query using the query language. Our queries
are simple and fixed
Like account = :account and strategy=:strategy and date > :date
So I would prefer maybe not to use a parser in the future sometime and am
really just wondering how.
For now, I am just going to us
I see the api in Lucene is new Field(String, String, Store, Index)
Is there anyway to store one of the fields as byte[]? Specifically the value I
am looking up I would like it to be byte[] instead of String. All my other
ones are String anyways.
Thanks,
Dean
This message and any attachments
I need to do something like a lucene query with
Where accountId in ( 1, 2, 3, 4)
Is there a way to do that in Lucene Query language?
Thanks,
Dean
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If
myAccount)), Occur.MUST);
bq.add(new TermRangeQuery("date", minDate, maxDate, false, false),
Occur.MUST);
and so on.
Bye
*Raf*
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079 <
dean.hil...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> I would like to skip creating the query using the query l
to do something like sql in () clause
You could use BooleanQuery with Occur.SHOULD quantificator
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanClause.Occur.html#SHOULD
On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Hiller, Dean x66079 wrote:
> I need to do something like a luc
d(new TermQuery(new Term("accountId", "3")), Occur.SHOULD);
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Hiller, Dean x66079 wrote:
> But the issue is that it MUST be 1, OR MUST be 2 so does that still work?
>
> Also, how do you write that in the query syntax?
>
> Thanks,
> Dean
&
Because when I use [ 20110601 TO * ] lucene does not return my results greater
than 20110601 but when I use
[20110601 TO ], it works fine. Why is this? How do I get everything
larger than 20110601. I have another
Case of sequence numbers and want to get everything above a certain numbe
I wonder if you would be better off creating a second index with the words
reversed.depends on your application profile I guess and what you want, but
an additional index may not be too bad in some cases to speed up the search.
Dean
-Original Message-
From: G.Long [mailto:jde...@gma
gs to mind.
**
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> I see the api in Lucene is new Field(String, String, Store, Index)
>
> Is there anyway to store one of the fields as byte[]? Specifically the value
> I am looking up I would like it to be by
Anyone know how to do a simple RamDirectory...I just created it but it is
failing with this...
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.IndexNotFoundException: no segments* file
found in org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory@1d5a7f6
lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.SingleInstanceLockFactory@64804:
I am running over a 100 million row nosql set and unfortunately building 1
million indexes. Each row I get may or may not be for the index I just wrote
too so I can't keep IndexWriter open very long. I am currently simulating how
long it would take me to build all the indexes and it looks like
I read that in a lot of cases IndexWriter.optimize does not have to be called.
I then deleted it and my junit test case broke because results were coming back
in the query that were not supposed to be coming back :(. I think everything
is single tested. Maybe I should write a more raw junit te
s you are trying to open a searcher on a RAMDirectory that
doesn't yet contain anything. Files only get written when stuff is
added to an index and the writer is closed or committed.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> Anyone know how to do a simple Ram
When I do a writer.open(), writer.add(), writer.close(), how many files can I
expect to be opened with Lucene.
I am running indexes on some very big data so we have 16 writers open and I
hit the limit of 20 on my machine so I increased it to the max of 1048576
files open, BUT that might
We are using a sort of nosql environment and deleting 200 gig on one machine
from the database is fast, but then we go and delete 5 gigs of indexes that
were created and it takes forever
Is there any option in lucene to make it so it uses LARGER files and less count
of files so it is easier
27 matches
Mail list logo
