Hi
I last used dotLucene 143 and now I'm wanting to upgrade to 294.
What I've discovered is that there are quite a few changes..
One of them is in respect of Search. Previously one supplied a query and
received a number of hits. I didn't have an issue with preservation of state
so was quite happ
Two queries about ranges:
1. field:[a TO z] does not return the same as field:[z TO a]
I think it should. The standard QueryParser or even the range query should
ascertain the lowest and highest and switch them around if necessary
2. How do I search for negative numbers in a range. For example
I'm only a novice at these things but if I had to do that right now? I'd add
a document that represents that primary key with a value representing the
next available number and everytime I go to do some additions I'd get it,
use the value and then delete and re-add that document with the revised ne
eers, Gwyn
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 January 2006 01:54
To:
Cc: Gwyn Carwardine
Subject: Re: Handling of colons in QueryParserTokenManager
Gwyn - this is a question for java-user@ list, I'm answering there.
Perhaps you can write y
>> 2. How do I search for negative numbers in a range. For example
>> field:[-3 TO
>> 2] ?
>>
>> I don't mind hacking code such that my numbers are indexed as
>> +0001 and
>> -0001 and then I can override the query parser to change my
>> query to
>> [-003 TO +002]. However.. "
I'm using the .net port of highlighter (1.5) and I notice it doesn't
highlight range or prefix queries.. Is this consistent with the java
version? Only I note my standard reference of www.lucenebook.com seems to
support highlighting.. is this using that same highlighter version (couldn't
find any v
lighter.
hope this helps,
Koji
> -Original Message-
> From: Gwyn Carwardine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:28 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Highlighter
>
>
> I'm using the .net port of highlighter (1.5) and I
>> Yes I think you're right. On reading the "lucene in action" chapted on
>> highlighting I found it squirreled in the middle of the text. I get
>> the
>> feeling that whilst I have so far found query parser to be the primary
>> method of building queries that this is not ht eprimary method used
I was happy to take the hit of storing the text twice.
I have created an aggregate field called "CONTENTS" that has all the other
fields concatenated together.
I also created a list of the other fields (because they can vary from doc to
doc) in another field "FIELDLIST"
I search this field and fo
I want to be able to store items and attachments such that they are treated
as a single document.
On the other hand I want to be able to store them separately; there is not
point in reindexing an attachment if I've simply changed the description.
Here's an example: A system used to track job can
The good bit about Bayesian is that it continuously learns.
The downside is that you have to teach it.
Not quite as simple as a list of rude words.
There's an open source Bayesian mail filter called spambayes
(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net) which may lead you to interesting places.
-Gwyn
-
Have you considered running the .net version (dotLucene)? The converters for
Office and PDF are freely available and there is a cheap commercial IFilter
available for wordperfect files (and many others).
-Gwyn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09
Hi all, We're using dotLucene (vanilla) in our commercial product and we're
redistributing dotLucene with our product.
What do we need to do in terms of licensing - what notices do we need to
include and where?
Any help much appreciated
Regards, Gwyn
ik
On May 11, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Gwyn Carwardine wrote:
> Hi all, We're using dotLucene (vanilla) in our commercial product
> and we're
> redistributing dotLucene with our product.
>
> What do we need to do in terms of licensing - what notices do we
> need to
&g
14 matches
Mail list logo
