ions/45275557/lucene-near-real-time-search>
-
Gautam Worah.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:10 PM Trevor Nicholls
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> Lucene 8.6.3
>
>
>
> In a prototype application I build a Lucene index with a single process and
> query it with another. Every operati
Apache Derby mailing list).
-
Gautam Worah.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 3:02 PM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Also, I try to semi-aggressively upgrade Lucene's nightly benchmarks to new
> JDK releases and leave an annotation on the nightly charts:
&g
e see is because
we have forked the class and have modified it a bit.
I just assumed that the upstream Lucene package would've also gotten errors
on the JDK17 build because it was untouched.
-
Gautam Worah.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 5:07 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> > I would a bit caref
matches what Uwe described in an
earlier email.
Regards,
Gautam Worah.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:13 AM Robert Muir wrote:
> Or just keep your small heap and tweak the 200ms target to be a lower
> value. It is just a JVM parameter, and it is dumb as rocks:
>
> That 200ms constant does
to rollback to a commit
without closing the writer.
Hope this helps.
Gautam Worah.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 6:35 AM wrote:
> I’m using an IndexSearcher created from an IndexWriter (NRT mode).
>
> Up until now the IW was kept open forever.
>
> I want to properly handle cases whe
Hi Yixun,
Given that Lucene supports file format backwards compatibility for X-1
major version release with version X application code,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/lucene/BackwardsCompatibility
Here is something you can try:
Keep using Lucene 8 indexes and Lucene 8 application co
t should be *that* slow.. maybe share the code you are
using to retrieve the vectors?
Regards,
Gautam Worah.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 4:40 AM Uthra wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> The use case is to handle index updates along with its vector
> field without resending the vector in chang
Does your application see a lot of document updates/deletes?
GITHUB#11761 could have potentially affected you. Whenever I see large
indexing times, my first suspicion is towards increased merge activity.
Regards,
Gautam Worah.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:14 PM Marc Davenport
wrote:
> Hi Adr
: try sending in ./lucene/core/src and don't send in
the `-index` input. It should create a folder on its own in the location
from where you are running the command.
You should see an output like `Indexing to directory ...`
Best,
Gautam Worah.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:35 PM Deepak Goel wrote
/document/StringField.html
Best,
Gautam Worah.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 12:05 AM Wojtek wrote:
> Hi Froh,
>
> thank you for the information.
>
> I updated the code and re-open the reader - it seems that the update
> is reflected and search for old document doesn't yield anythi
it has something to do with NRT, and deleting docs etc. If
not, then that means that your query/data is wrong somewhere. This is how I
debugged your first problem.
Best,
Gautam Worah.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 4:17 AM Wojtek wrote:
> Addendum, output is:
>
> ```
>
> maxDoc: 3
>
> ma
tml#storedFields()
for crafting the `updateDocument()` call..
Best,
Gautam Worah.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 3:12 PM Wojtek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for reply and apologies for being somewhat "all over the
> place".
>
> Regarding "tokenization" - should it happen if I us
JDK recommended by
PyLucene 9.7?
Best,
Gautam Worah.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 9:06 AM Prashant Saxena
wrote:
> Hello,
> OS : Windows 10
> PyLucene : 9.7.0
> JDK : 23.0
>
> Although I can download the binary distribution of version 9.7.0, I have
> decided to build it from
13 matches
Mail list logo
