Count me in for Bangalore.
This mail thread indicates, 3 from Bangalore and 1 from Mumbai. If we get more
people then we could do some meetup.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene bangalore chapter
Do we have a
I am also in the way to upgrade from 3.0.3 to 3.5. Any other API changes we
need to care about? I use ParallelMultiSearcher.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Uwe Schindler"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 5:18 AM
Subject: [Bulk] RE: any tips for upgrading Lu
ent search performance has improved over time, and the default
TieredMergePolicy now targets segments with deletions."
This means usage of this method is not justified any more. I am doing
optimization once per day. Is that not required now.
tter in optimized indexes. What about 3.5.0?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Lea"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: upgrading from 3.0.3 to 3.5.0
> I am upgrading from 3.0.3 to 3.5.0.
>
> 1) NumberTools is deprecated. I am con
documents
I need to do this. When the application starts, I have my writer and reader
ready. I have a thread which crawls the filesytem and adds it to index and
another one performs search. Is this intentional?
Regards
Ganesh
--
q.tis
_4xq.tvd
_4xq.tvf
_4xq.tvx
_4xq_6.del
_5o4.cfs
_5wh.cfs
_5wi.cfs
_5wj.cfs
_5wk.cfs
segments.gen
segments_3d8
Regards
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-u
, or document
indexed after certain date.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ilya Zavorin"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:39 AM
Subject: [Bulk] can I make incremental index/search more efficient?
>I have a fairly straightforward task: I have a co
37 Feb 22 19:52 _203_1.del
332 Feb 22 20:42 _a3_k.del
487 Feb 22 20:42 _ig_j.del
511 Feb 22 20:42 _rc_j.del
Regards
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e
. I thought to break in to
multiple small index with same schema. Now optimization is discourged and the
name has been changed to forceMerge to discourge its use.
I just want to confirm, Is Single Index would be good for millions of records?
Regards
Ganesh
index.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Lea"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple index vs Single Index
Millions of docs in a single index is definitely OK. If it was my
system I'd willingly trade slightly slower indexing for
Hello all,
I was using DateTime as String and now i am using NumericField. Using
NumericField takes more heap and storage space then the earlier String version.
Is it good to move to NumericField or stick with String. I am using this field
for search and sort.
Regards
Ganesh
I tried NumericField with Integer value and Long value. There is no difference
in space and heap utilization. Will it be? Are both are same?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Uwe Schindler"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:52 PM
Subject: [Bulk] RE: Date time
Thanks. I use this field for Rangequery and sort. I think it is best to use Int
to gain some heap.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Uwe Schindler"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 5:08 PM
Subject: [Bulk] RE: RE: Date time as String or Numeric field
> Hi,
Thanks Li Li.
Please share your experience in 64 bit. How big your indexes are?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Li Li"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene performance in 64 Bit
>I think many users of lucene use large memory
her of the token matches, it returns the results.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Damerian"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: QueryParser strange behavior
> Στις 1/3/2012 3:08 μμ, ο/η Ian Lea έγραψε:
>> Not a clue. I suggest you po
It is fixed now. I need to enable
qp.setAutoGeneratePhraseQueries(true);
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: QueryParser strange behavior
Hello Damerian,
Please let me know, How you fixed the pro
another system.
When i started my application in another system, I could see my search database
whiped out. Only write lock remains. The behaviour is unpredictable.
I am not using SnapshotDeletionPolicy. Is that any other way to acheive this
using SAN replicator?
Regards
Ganesh
Hello all,
I am currently using v3.0.3 and planning to upgrade to v3.6. Shall i go ahead
with the upgrade OR wait for 4.0?
Regards
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
Thanks for the reply. Any idea how much time it would take to go for 4.0 stable
release? I want to go for v4.0 but i have to use only the stable version.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Shai Erera"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: Upgr
again sort on docid in reverse order.
record_4 201207170102
record_3 201207170102
record_2 201207170101
record_1 201207170101
Is it good to use multiple sort fields? Using sort on docid will consume any
memory? Is there any other way out to acheive this.
Regards
Ganesh
Any thoughts on this?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:23 PM
Subject: [Bulk] Multiple sort field
Hello all,
I have more than one record having same time stamp. When i sort by date time in
decending order, the set
Hello all,
What is the road map of next major release? Few days back, many have posted
their expectation / ideas for the next release. What is the plan and what all
the things we could expect from the next release
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo
(DirectoryReader.java:69)
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open(IndexReader.java:476)
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open(IndexReader.java:403)
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com
I am using Lucene 2.9.1 and there was no exception in the past.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Michael McCandless"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: read past EOF
It looks like it may be this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/j
now i didn't faced any issue. I
used Lucene 2.9 and recently upgraded to 3.0.2.
Do i need to switch to MultiReader?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Luca Rondanini"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: best practice: 1.4 billions docu
Thanks for the input.
My results are sorted by date and i am not much bothered about score. Will i
still be in trouble?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Muir"
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: best practice: 1.4 billions document
I am using ParallelMultiSearcher and querying more than 50 shards. I get wrong
results for query A NOT B. I am getting correct results if i query A -B.
I am also getting correct results for wildcard and fuzzy.
What is the solution? I need to use IndexSearcher with MultiReader?
Regards
Ganesh
. Could any one in this group could help me? I am using tika
directly to extract the contents, which later gets indexed.
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
The main problem is i am not getting whitespace and newline char. This is
happening only for PDF documents.
Sample outoput: Someofthedifferencesare but it should be Some of the
differences are
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Aristov"
To:
Sent: Friday
I first extract the contents from documents using tika and latter index it with
Lucene. The problem is the extracted text from PDF using tika has no
whitespaces.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "McGibbney, Lewis John"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:40
Thanks for the link. I downloaded the tool and pdftotext extracts correctly. I
also dropped a mail to the tika user group. It is a regression in latest
release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-548. Hopefully coming
release will have a fix.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message
their thoughts on this.
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
Have you tried using Lucene in 64 Bit with more than 8 GB RAM.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Pradeep Singh"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: Scale up design
> 8GB is used on laptops. For servers you need more.
>
> On Sun, De
more ideas. We need to design whether to scale out or
scale up.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Erickson"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Scale up design
Here's a great intro to the garbage collectio
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Toke Eskildsen"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:36 PM
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Scale up design
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 09:42 +0100, Ganesh wrote:
>> What is the advantage of going for 64 Bit.
>
> Larger maximum
I have done some benchmarking and based on that my estimate of RAM requirement
would be 3 - 4 GB. My question is to go for 64 bit or scale out with 3 systems?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Toke Eskildsen"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:20 PM
Subje
Hello Simon,
I don't hesitate to move to 64 bit. I require a suggestion whether to move to
64 bit (Scale up) or scale out with multiple system. I have started
investigating 64 bit, i want to know about its performance and if anyone in
this group has already tried using it.
Regards
G
Thanks. I going to try in 64 bit. I will post some update in a day or two.
Do I need to compile the Lucene and analyzer code in 64 bit JVM?
Do I need to use MMAPDirectory in 64 bit?
Any other tips targeting 64 bit?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Danil ŢORIN"
.
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e
about the old users, their data will be still added to the
server1. How to address this issue. Is rebuilding the index the only way.
Could any one share their experience, How they solved scale out problems?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Anshum"
To:
Se
world");
My question is why i need to give the text within codes (basically as a
phrase). While indexing i have not given and it is indexing as single term and
while searching also it should consider the complete text as single term.
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile
Exactly. QueryParser is splitting it in to two words.
>>Just build the query directly.
TermQuery or PhraseQuery?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Lea"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Keyword Analyzer
Presumably because wi
US(50) /Articles/xyz (25)
/Articles/aaa (10)
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/downloa
)
/Articles/aaa (10)
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hostetter"
To: "Lucene Users"
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 7:29 AM
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Facet search
>
> : This is another indicator that we should re
Hello all,
Could any one guide me how to backup or do replication with Lucene.
Regards
Ganesh
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
-
To
Any suggestions. We are planning to move towords cloud and its become a
mandatory requirement to have backup or replication of search db.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 12:06 PM
Subject: Backup or replication option w
Regards
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
I tested the same with Lucene 2.9.1 and found very less thread count but with
3.0.2 it is very high. Do i need to revert back to Lucene 2.9.1.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 5:17 PM
Subject: ParallelMultisearcher
Is this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2249 got fixed in
3.0.3?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: ParallelMultisearcher
I tested the same with Lucene 2.9.1 and found very less th
shing frequently.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Devon H. O'Dell"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: ParallelMultisearcher
> 2011/3/17 Ganesh :
>> Is this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2249 got fixed in
>
There is no ParallelMultiSearcher.close() in 2.9.1 and its been added in 3.0.
Thanks for pointing out. I am not aware of.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Uwe Schindler"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 11:27 PM
Subject: [Bulk] RE: ParallelMultisearcher
&
?
2. Is your index optimized?
I have a doubt, If we keep the indexes size to 30 GB then each file size (fdt,
fdx etc) would in GB's. Small addition or deletion to the file will not cause
more IO as it has to skip those bytes and write it at the end of file.
Regards
Ganesh
- Ori
in GB's. Small addition or
deletion to the file will not cause more IO as it has to skip those bytes and
write it at the end of file.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Burton-West, Tom"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: Sharding Techni
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Shai Erera"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Index size and performance degradation
>I agree w/ Erick, there is no cutoff point (index size for that matter)
> above which you start sharding.
>
> What
Is it a bad idea to keep multiple shards in a single system?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Toke Eskildsen"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Index size and performance degradation
> On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 10:10 +0200, Itamar Syn-Hershko
less number of concurrent users going to search at a
time.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh"
To: ;
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Index size and performance degradation
Is it a bad idea to keep multiple shards in a single system?
Rega
Hi Smitha,
You need to have your own custom analyzer which breaks the word by - or
_. Use the same analyzer for indexing and searching.
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On 7/4/2014 11:41 AM, Smitha Kuldeep (smtt) wrote:
Hello team,
We are using lucen-core-2.9.1.jar for indexing and
How Solr handles this scenario... Is it reopening reader after every
delete OR it maintains the list of delete documents in cache?
Regards
Ganesh
On 7/11/2014 4:00 AM, Tri Cao wrote:
You need to reopen your searcher after deleting. From Java doc for
SearcherManager:
In addition you should
resolve this issue.
Regards
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
the index. Every minute the IndexReader will be reopened.
public TopDocs searchAfter(ScoreDoc after, Query query, int numHits)
throws IOException
Please let me know how to handle this.
Regards
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Ganesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
operation, few are
faster and few are slower. This is because the searcher object is getting
updated.
How do i warm up my searcher object, without the intervention of User
request.
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
30 million or more. I plan to shard the index. but
Multisearcher will give me benifit.
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Single document of 16 MB seems to be big. I think you are trying to store
the entire document content. If it is so drop the stored field and store its
reference information in the database, which could help to retreive the
content later.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From
days. My Index DB is in HDD.
I want to the pros and cons of sharding. I think maintance of the DB becomes
easier.
It would be very much helpful, if you share some of your thoughts.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Anshum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Fr
helpful.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Anshum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: Single searcher vs Multi Searcher
Hi Ganesh,
About the memory consumption while sorting, it would end up using similar
amoun
any incremental updates??
What have gained by sharding the index.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Anshum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Single searcher vs Multi Searcher
There were all of the links I
all DBs opened and
warmed up and this will require same amount of memory as single searcher
would do.
Let me conclude:
The benifits of going for sharding the database
1) increase in search time
2) increase in indexing speed
3) easy maintance.
Any other benifits?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original
Hello Mark,
I am also facing the same sorting issue.
In my case there will be only addition and deletion of data [no modification
of existing records]. Whether i could rely on the indexed order of sorting.
"SortField.FIELD_DOC" is the one helps to do sorting on indexed order?
Rega
You should have stored the foldername or fullpath of the file as part of
Lucene document otherwise it is difficult to retrieve.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "叶双明" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: Searching s
What is your problem?
If the foldernames are already stored then it could be retrieved from
search. Use DuplicateFilter on field "foldername" to get the unique list of
folders.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Hello David,
Use TopDocs or TopFieldDocs to collect only required hits.
TopDocs topDocs = searcher.search(query,10)
int docID = topDocs.scoreDocs[index].doc;
Document doc = searcher.doc(docID);
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "David Massart" <[EM
Sorry. I misunderstood.
As Karsten suggested, perform search for each term and do the logical
operation on the collected hits.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Searching sets of documents
Yes. Once the Indexreader is closed, you should not do make any calls with
that object.
Extend the IndexReader to add support for reference count. Close the reader
once the count is zero.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Khawaja Shams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Lucene will not be able to directly index the files. You need to write a
parser to parse the files and provide its contents.
In case if a file got modifed after index, then you need to re-index its
content.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Gilliam" <[EM
incRef/decRef methods are protected. Is there any other way to use these
methods without extending it?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Closing Index Reader
\lucene-2.4.0\src"
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "prabina pattanayak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:42 AM
Subject: I am not able to run Lucene 2.4 Demo
Hi All,
i am a beginner to Lucene.
and i a
will be overlapped?
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
appricated. I think most of folks might have done
this before.
Does Lucene 2.4 handles this better?
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Could you give me full stack trace.
Also provide the output messges displayed on the console.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: prabina pattanayak
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Ganesh
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: I am
Hello all,
I need to maintain multiple db and i don't want to sort on datetime as it is
taking huge RAM. I want to sort on indexed order. Using Multisearcher or
ParallelMultiSearcher will maintain the index order. If it does then i don't
need to merge the indexDB.
Regards
Gane
timestamp then the cpu is spiked to 100% and this is happening for every
minute. In order to avoid these issues, i am planning to break my DB and to
do sort on indexed order.
Will multisearcher will maintain indexed order on sorting?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "
Multisearcher and ParallelMultiSearcher, when requested to sort on doc
(indexed order), it merges the result by docID of each DB.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Mu
. Could anyone explain why?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?
Multisearcher and ParallelMultiSearcher, when requested to sort
nto hq
ScoreDoc scoreDoc = scoreDocs[j];
scoreDoc.doc += starts[i];//Doc id is
incremented***
if (!hq.insert (scoreDoc)) //Insertion should do
automatic sorting
break;}
Regards
Gan
Any commets are suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Ganesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?
Multisearcher after performing
MailIndexer.IndexSearcherEx.reOpenDB(IndexSearcherEx.java:102)
Please correct me, if i am wrong.
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
2.3.2?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Reopen IndexReader
Did you create your IndexSearcher using a String or File (not Directory)?
If so, it sounds like
In v2.4, TermsFilter class is not available in
org.apache.lucene.search.TermsFilter
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to write your own sort comparator
SortField(String field, SortComparatorSource comparator)
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "naveen.quill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 11:27 AM
Subject: how to sort the result by ignorin
order to update, I am
planning to use RMI and create a single application which does both index
and search and also exposes some search and delete methods.
Is there any other way to achieve this?
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
unexpected application crash, sometimes the last saved bookmark and the last
indexed document in the database is not matching.
One another option is to keep the information in a same or different
database.
I think many might have faced this situitation.
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to
shing!
I will also try to avoid the crash, but my product will be installed in
different customer places and there may be a possibility of forceful
shutdown or killing java application etc. I need to be prepare for this
situitation also.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: &qu
ment using reader
2. Add the document with new state using Writer.
I think, we can't avoid using DeleteDocument of Reader. Suggest me, if there
is any other way.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Antony Bowesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wedne
want to communicate?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: Marked for deletion
On Nov 25, 2008, at 5:00 AM, Ganesh wrote:
My index application is a separate proce
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: Which is faster/better
So in your UI, you'd like the delete to happen immediately and then it's
OK if the updated
If you want to query for Tom, then you need to index the value Tom. Create
one more field as Alias or add alias name as part of name field.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Khawaja Shams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 11:46 AM
S
memory leak.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Magnus Rundberget" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: lucene nicking all my memory
Hi,
We have an application using Tomcat, Spring etc and Lucene 2.4.0.
Our index is abou
by Reader, so that it will get reflected
in the results immediately.
Regards
Ganesh
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
