Hi,
excuse me for my double post. I have asked this about a week ago
already, can anyone tell me if it's directly possible to do pivot
faceting in lucene? I know that it's available in Solr, you can
specify your categories and it's going to return conditional counts.
Cheers,
Robert
Hi,
you should always start a *new* mail thread when asking such questions. You
just replied to another mail, so this is treated as an answer to another
thread, so most people on the mailing list will not notice your e-mail.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://w
Hi all.
I have a situation where I want to look up some DocValues for each hit
in the search.
I have a few ways I could go about this:
1. Use search() as normal and then iterate the hits at the end to
collect the values (easiest?)
2. Use TopStoreDocsCollector, TopFieldCollector, etc. as
This may be an "XY" problem, you're asking how to do X thinking
it will solve Y without telling us what Y is.
What do you want to _do_ with the DV values you look up for each hit?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Trejkaz wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a situation where I want to look u
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> This may be an "XY" problem, you're asking how to do X thinking
> it will solve Y without telling us what Y is.
>
> What do you want to _do_ with the DV values you look up for each hit?
Keep them around as the ID to use to look up informatio
First off, the internal Lucene doc ID has never been stable as long as any
segment merging of whatever style was going on, don't quite know
where you're getting that idea.
It sounds like what you're really looking for is to export complete result
sets to "do something with them later". That's what
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> First off, the internal Lucene doc ID has never been stable as long as any
> segment merging of whatever style was going on, don't quite know
> where you're getting that idea.
>
> It sounds like what you're really looking for is to export com
Oops, wrong list. Then I'm clueless.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Trejkaz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>> First off, the internal Lucene doc ID has never been stable as long as any
>> segment merging of whatever style was going on, don't quite know
>> wher