Hello ,
I have some word which contain full stop (.) itself ,example is
(1) .Net , asp.net .i want lucene consider it as a single word not full
stop .
how to achieve it.
another problem is some word contain specific format
like c# .lucene not searching this type of word.
if word
My trick would be to replace .net with dotNet (or use some funky Unicode-letter
to replace the dot).
If you use consistently the same analyzer-chain, then it will match cleanly.
paul
On 6 nov. 2014, at 12:42, Rajendra Rao wrote:
> I have some word which contain full stop (.) itself ,examp
FYI I plan to implement this in Lucene-spatial & Solr in January.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Shahak Nagiel
wrote:
> I need a way to perform a spatial aggregation query against a
Thanks, David. In the meantime, care to share any thoughts about your planned
implementation?
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:11 AM, "david.w.smi...@gmail.com"
wrote:
FYI I plan to implement this in Lucene-spatial & Solr in January.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Co
>From an API standpoint, I envision you would supply a rectangular region of
interest and some means of specifying the resolution. It could be the
so-called “grid level” in lucene spatial (1 is biggest most coarsest,
larger numbers yield progressively smaller cells), or it might be expressed
in te
Hi,I have a Lucene index contains a collection of documents. For an input
string segment (s) and a specific document in the index (d), I want to get the
number of common terms between s and d.After searching the web, I found that I
can extract all terms of d using "IndexReader.getTermVector" and
Hi,I have a Lucene index contains a collection of documents. For an input
string segment (s) and a specific document in the index (d), I want to get the
number of common terms between s and d.After searching the web, I found that I
can extract all terms of d using "IndexReader.getTermVector" an
How are folks handling Solr exceptions that occur during batch indexing?
Solr (4.6) stops parsing the docs stream when an error occurs (e.g. a doc
with a missing mandatory field), and stops indexing. The bad document is
not identified, so it would be hard for the client to recover by skipping
over
