Hi Lance,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> I'm responsible for the OpenNLP wiki page:
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/OpenNLP
>
> Please add me to the list of editors.
I just added you to the ContributorsGroup, please let me know if you
have trouble editing wiki pages.
--
Dear all,
We recently migrated from lucene 2.3.1 to lucene 4.1. We have a
custom facet implementation, which has also been migrated. We resorted to
stay with the same facet approach instead of moving to the taxonomy index
style faceting.
But the problem is that, whenever we do
TermEnum.close() in past releases was a no-op I think, which is why it
was removed.
So not closing your TermsEnums should not cause any file handle leaking.
Are you sure you're closing all opened readers? Does your index have
too many segments? Are you not using CFS?
Try "lsof" to see which fi
Hello,
My first time post in this group.
I have been using Lucene recently. I have a question.
Where can I find a good explanation on Indexes. Or rather how indexing (Not
really the mathematical aspect) happens in Lucene, what all
attributes(charTerm, Offset etc) come into play? And the way it i
Even though you've posted for Lucene, you might want to consider taking a
look at Solr because Solr has an Admin UI with an Analysis page which gives
you a nice display of how index and query text is analyzed into tokens,
terms, and attributes - all of which Solr inherits from Lucene.
And chec
Sure. Thanks Jack.
I don't have much experience working with Lucene, however, here is what I
am trying to resolve.
I learned that the Custom attributes cannot be used for indexing or
searching purposes. However I wanted the attributes to be used for indexing
and searching. So I created custom attr
Your stored value could be very different from your indexed (searchable)
value. You can also associate payloads with an indexed term. And there are
DocValues as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nikhil desai
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 8:06 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apac
I don't think I could get much from what you said, could you please
elaborate? Appreciate.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Your stored value could be very different from your indexed (searchable)
> value. You can also associate payloads with an indexed term. And there are
Sorry, but you really are going to need to work on your "Lucene Basics"
before you tackle such an ambitious effort.
The Lucene JavaDoc, Solr Wikis, Stack Underflow, blogs of McCandless, et al,
and Google search in general will cover a lot of the ground, including those
mysterious terms:
- In
Hi
I had an index of precious files with Lucene 2.4, i wanted to switch to
lucene 4.3 as Lucene 2.4 index is giving an exception of illegal arguments on
function moreLikeThis. I upgrade that index to 3.5 but still getting the same
exception. Can any please help. Following is the stack trace of
Hi,
This is not a Lucene problem or a problem with the index. It looks like one of
those:
a) You have some outdated Lucene JAR files somewhere in your classpath (e.g.
JAR file from Lucene 2.4 mixed with those of Lucene 3.4) in the classpath. You
should clean up your compilation and runtime clas
11 matches
Mail list logo
