Re: Efficient string lookup using Lucene

2012-08-25 Thread Noopur Julka
Hi, I have a similar issue. I need lucene search to work with kanji characters (japanese). The hits object (or topDocs) returns length = 0 for results but works well for english. I know my index contains matches as luke (lucene search tool) renders them. I tried lace analyser - did not work. Re

RE: Efficient string lookup using Lucene

2012-08-25 Thread Ilya Zavorin
Does it mean that the resulting index will be very large? Thanks, Ilya -Original Message- From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 4:59 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Efficient string lookup using Lucene > search for a string "run", I

RE: Efficient string lookup using Lucene

2012-08-25 Thread Ilya Zavorin
Does Lucene support this type of structure, or do I need to somehow implement it outside Lucene? By the way, I need this to run on an Android phone so size of memory might be an issue... Thanks, Ilya Zavorin -Original Message- From: Dawid Weiss [mailto:dawid.we...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: Efficient string lookup using Lucene

2012-08-25 Thread Noopur Julka
Index being very large can be ruled out as Luke returned few results and the app is capable of returning approx 200 results. Regards, Noopur Julka On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Ilya Zavorin wrote: > Does Lucene support this type of structure, or do I need to somehow > implement it outside

Re: Efficient string lookup using Lucene

2012-08-25 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Seems worth mentioning in partial response to this thread's topics that (almost) regardless of index strategy, lucene performance hinges on number of matched documents per query, not total docs in index. There are other mitigating factors (disk type, ram size, etc), but worst case performance analy

Re: Efficient string lookup using Lucene

2012-08-25 Thread Noopur Julka
I haven't yet found answer to my original question which was how to work with search for japanese characters. Regards, Noopur Julka On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Seems worth mentioning in partial response to this thread's topics that > (almost) regardless of index s