Re: Escaping Special Characters

Hi, I'm not getting you. escape() method takes String as an argument. The code snippet I am using is as follows *String escaped = MultiFieldQueryParser.escape(queryString); Query query1 = parser.parse(escaped); TopDocs results = searcher.search(query1); *Please point out where I may be going wro

Re: full text searching in cloud for minor enterprises

Look at searchblox On Monday, July 4, 2011, Li Li wrote: > hi all, >    I want to provide full text searching for some "small" websites. > It seems cloud computing is  popular now. And it will save costs > because it don't need employ engineer to maintain > the machine. >    For now, there are

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 3.3

Hi, does anyone know where I could find the class "ChainedFilter" in Lucene 3.3.? Before our Upgrade (from 3.0.2 to 3.3.3) it was located in lucene-miscbut I cannot find that anymore at that location... Thx for your help, Jan Am 01.07.2011 07:56, schrieb Robert Muir: > July 2011, Apache Luc

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 3.3

Hi Jan, * LUCENE-2323: Moved contrib/regex into contrib/queries. Moved the queryparsers under contrib/misc and contrib/surround into contrib/queryparser. Moved contrib/fast-vector-highlighter into contrib/highlighter. Moved ChainedFilter from contrib/misc to contrib/queries. contrib/spat

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 3.3

Hi Robert, thanks a lotfound the right one ;-) Thx again, Jan Am 05.07.2011 14:34, schrieb Robert Muir: > Hi Jan, > > * LUCENE-2323: Moved contrib/regex into contrib/queries. Moved the >queryparsers under contrib/misc and contrib/surround into > contrib/queryparser. >Moved contrib

deleting 8,000,000 indexes takes forever!!!! any solution to this...

We are using a sort of nosql environment and deleting 200 gig on one machine from the database is fast, but then we go and delete 5 gigs of indexes that were created and it takes forever Is there any option in lucene to make it so it uses LARGER files and less count of files so it is easier

Re: Escaping Special Characters

Hi Govind, I think you are wrong by assuming escape should receive a query string as parameter. However, it's meant to receive a term as parameter, which will later be used to create a query. See the example below: // this is bad, since +, &, * and - will be escaped String query = "+lucene&solr -

Re: deleting 8,000,000 indexes takes forever!!!! any solution to this...

Hi Dean Could you share a little more information about those indexes (and your problem in general), such as: * Is there one index, or 8M indexes? * How many files do those indexes contain? Do you use compound file format? * What is the command/API you use to delete the indexes? * Lucene version,

Index statistics

Hi there, A work with Neo4j , a NoSQL graph database tightly coupled with Lucene. I am now working on an optimizing execution engine. To do this well, I would like to know more about the existing Lucene indices. Ideally, I'd like to be able to ask a Lucene index how many hits a

Re: Index statistics

This API doesn't exist today. Lucene has long needed for queries impls to do this, so that we can properly plan/optimize how the query is run. EG an AND query would use this to pick the more restrictive clause to drive the intersection. For TermQuery you could just call IR.docFreq? (Doesn't tak

Lucene 3.3: Self referring deprecation use insteads in LowerCaseTokenizer

Hi, just noted that the deprecation use ... insteads in LowerCaseTokenizer (Lucene 3.3) refer to themselves instead of the new constructors with (Version...). E.g. *@deprecated*use {@link #LowerCaseTokenizer(Reader)}instead. should be #LowerCaseTokenizer(Version, Reader). Same for the two ot

Re: full text searching in cloud for minor enterprises

sounds great. but I'd like to do it myself. searchblox did provide a cloud hosting service and it seems it implements cloud computing itself other than using common services that are provided by google, amazon etc. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Joe Scanlon wrote: > Look at searchblox > >