Because I like to have Luke always sitting at hand, I have packed this
release as a MacOSX disk-image and applcation.
http://www.activemath.org/~paul/tmp/Luke-0.9.9.dmg
The icon could be better (I need a hires of Lucene's icon, haven't
found it yet).
Potentially the packaging should
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Because I like to have Luke always sitting at hand, I have packed this
release as a MacOSX disk-image and applcation.
http://www.activemath.org/~paul/tmp/Luke-0.9.9.dmg
The icon could be better (I need a hires of Lucene's icon, haven't found
it yet).
Potentially the
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 08:49 +0200, Jake Mannix wrote:
> One of the big problems you'll run into with this index size is that
> you'll never have enough RAM to give your OS's IO cache enough room to keep
> much of this index in memory, so you're going to be seeking in this monster
> file a lot. [.
How many processors do you have on this system?
If you are CPU bound, 100 threads is going to be 10 times slower (at a
minimum) than 10 threads (unless you have more than 10 CPUs).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Wilson Wu wrote:
> Dear Friend,
> I hav
Hi Michael and Ian,
Thanks very much for helps, I will investigate and test more.
Best regards, Lisheng
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:13 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 1.4.3 "Alre
Code details: When I execute this line,I get a blank search query.
queryField =
multiFieldQueryParser.Parse(inpKeywords);keywordsQuery.Add(queryField,
BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);And here is my custom analyzer:
public class CustomAnalyzer : Analyzer{private static readonly
Whitespace
Hi, interesting discussion.
Supose my index now has 1 TB. I splitted into 16 hds (65GB per hd) in the
same machine with 16 cores.
Use parallelmultisearch it's a good idea for this structure?? Results wil be
fast?? Is there a better solution for this structure?
thanks,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:33
Hi -
FYI, Lucid's just put out a two white papers, one on Apache Lucene 2.9 and
one on Apache Solr 1.4:
- "What's New in Lucene 2.9" covers range of performance improvements and
new features (per segment indexing, trierange numeric analysis, and more),
along with recommendations for upgrading your