Hi John,
IndexReader newInner=in.reopen();
> if (in!=newInner)
> {
>in.close();
>this.in=newInner;
>
>// code to clean up my data
>_cache.clear();
>_indexData.load(this, true);
>init(_fieldConfig);
> }
>
Just to be sure on this, could
Yes...I constantly index with 8 threads on one writer while searching
with many more threads. Then I let it run for like an hour and watch.
The index is tiny to start and then grows to a moderate size...nothing
crazy.
I am also reopening a lot on a real index of 3.5 million + docs
though
Hi All:
I am just releasing a new binary distribution of Oracle-Lucene
integration by using Lucene-OJVM Data Catridge.
Here the change log:
* Compiled against Lucene 2.3.2 production release
* Used latest API for merging based on RAM usage
* Use Writer for deleting during Sync
* Confirm 4x impr
On Sonntag, 1. Juni 2008, syedfa wrote:
> I am trying to display my results from doing a search of an xml document
> (some quotes from shakespeare's "Hamlet") using a WildCard and Fuzzy
> search, and then I'm trying to highlight the keyword(s) in the results,
> but unfortunately I am having proble
: I've already tried this but the subject line is fixed and I wrote a roman to
: convince the mail daemon that I'm not interested in spamming.. but it didn't
: care :)
Silly question, but you were sending your email to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" correct?
Are you still havin
: The crux of the issue seems to be that lucene cannot open segments file that
: is inside the jar (under luceneFiles/index directory)
i'm not entirely sure why it would have problems finding the segments
file, but a larger problem is that Lucene needs random access which (last
time i checked)
: While I could add a future date to these documents, this kind of feels
: hackish and I would be interested in other ideas on how to filter out
: expired documents.
this just came up on the solr list, the answer is equally applicable
but note that you'll need to combine it with some other que
I don't know of a way, sorry. Most of the Similarity methods do not
take a field name.
On May 29, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Hider, Sandy wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to answer. I see what you mean. The thing
is I also plan on using the standard score. Would there be a way to
use
the both
Those benchmarks are pretty old, I think.
-Grant
On May 31, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Karl Wettin wrote:
31 maj 2008 kl. 14.25 skrev lucene user:
What are some average search and retrieval times for Lucene queries
in real
production use? Would people include relevant stuff like the number
of
do
As you can see I'm still part of this list.
I'll submit a bug report.
Thanks in advance,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 9:16 PM
To: Lucene Users
Cc: Daniel Freudenberger
Subject: RE: how to unsubscribe?
: I've alre
>
> : The crux of the issue seems to be that lucene cannot open segments file
> that
> : is inside the jar (under luceneFiles/index directory)
>
> i'm not entirely sure why it would have problems finding the segments
> file, but a larger problem is that Lucene needs random access which (last
> time
Hi,
I have done some more analysis on this issue. I think it is related to
lucene's default operator.
I am getting excat results, when I sets the default operator as 'OR', but
facing problem when setting the default operator as 'AND'.
The following are the lucene QueryParser outputs for both case
Hi Jarvis,
> I have a problem that how to "combine" two score to sort the search
> result documents.
> for example I have 10 million pages in lucene index , and i know their
> pagerank scores. i give a query to it , every docs returned have a
> lucene-score, mark it as R (relevant score)
13 matches
Mail list logo
