Hi,
I am working on a search project using Lucene and currently I am working on
parsing PDF documents. I was successful in implementing my parser using
Lucene and PDFBox. I have a doubt on how to exclude or (maybe delete) pages
from the index. I am not sure how to do this.. I mean when exactly it
Shyam - I moderated your message through, so please subscribe to the
list to send to it in the future.
Please provide us with some details - a standalone RAMDirectory-using
JUnit TestCase is the most ideal way to share an issue like this and
have someone else take a look at it. And frequen
Hi,
I think the easiest way is ro exclude the pages while you are parsing the
pdf document. So you will provide just the necessary pages to lucene.
Another solution is to create for each site an own document, this should
hafe a field "pagenumber" or, und you can delete the document from the
index
Hallo,
in my index every document consistsof multiple fields like
url,contents,description etc.I want to search for documents in the url
and the contents field.
My problem is that the constructor of QueryParser only provide one field
like "Query query=QueryParser.parse("query",field1,analyzer
On Dec 29, 2005, at 7:42 AM, Gaston wrote:
in my index every document consistsof multiple fields like
url,contents,description etc.I want to search for documents in the
url and the contents field.
My problem is that the constructor of QueryParser only provide one
field like "Query query=Que
Hi Gaston,
Have a look at MultiFieldQueryParser.
Greetings,
Daan
-Original Message-
From: Gaston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 13:42
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: QueryParser over multiple fields
Hallo,
in my index every document consistsof mu
Hallo Erik and Daan,
thank you for the help. MultFieldQueryParser is described in chapter 5,
I was searching in chapter 3. Sorry.
Greetings and best wishes for the New Year 2006!
Gaston
Daan de Wit schrieb:
Hi Gaston,
Have a look at MultiFieldQueryParser.
Greetings,
Daan
-Original
Hi,
You can also do it like this:
QueryParser.parse("(summary:DOG OR title:DOG)", "title", getAnalyzer());
QueryParser.parse("(summary:DOG AND title:DOG)", "title", getAnalyzer());
The "title" is the default column, so no need to reference in the
queryString eg:
QueryParser.parse("(summary:DOG
>
> Two options - MultiFieldQueryParser or building an aggregate single
> field to search. I use the aggregate field option, which entails
> building an additional field for each document, I call it "contents",
> and index _all_ of the searchable text into that field.
>
> Erik
How about a
On Dec 29, 2005, at 9:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two options - MultiFieldQueryParser or building an aggregate single
field to search. I use the aggregate field option, which entails
building an additional field for each document, I call it "contents",
and index _all_ of the searchable tex
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has seen or implemented the kind of solution where
the best fragments generated by Lucene's Highlighter, are correlated back to
the native documents such as PDF or MS Word.
Basically, I want to be able to use native (or any other) API's to highlight
Lucene's
>
>
> That's a perfectly good approach as well. I didn't mean to imply
> that there were only "two options", just that the two I suggested
> were the most commonly used ones.
>
> Erik
>
Ah, for a moment i thought i had overlooked a "canonical" solution, i'm
quite new to lucene. Thanks.
B
12 matches
Mail list logo
