Hey, I just started with Lucene 8. I personally did not stumble on any issues
yet.
If you need this for lets say simple solutions, just take the latest - in case
you are in doubt, take the latest 7.x.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 14.04.2019 um 23:01 schrieb gerasimos_rag :
>
> So I am com
So I am completely new in Lucene programming. So in the
tutorials(tutorials-point or youtube) I was able to find and install on my
pc Lucene 3.6.2. I also was able to make a sample indexer and index my first
files. But I see on the website that there is a version of 8.0.0. I have a
project in my u
End loop
Can I just use this production or need to wait till this is officially
released ?
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:00 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
Hi
uthuswamy Chittathoor <
> srir...@ivycomptech.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
> Subject: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Friday, 22 January, 2010, 6:04 PM
>
> Hi:
>
>
>
> I am trying
Hi,
I am planing to integrate Lucene into my web application. Can you please give
high level steps to follow?
Thanks
Zhou
--- On Fri, 22/1/10, Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
wrote:
From: Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
Subject: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
To: java-user
hat would this structure be ? Is this to be done through Lucene.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:47 PM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 --
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
the first step if determining why you really need to support *poker*
on 100M database rows, is it some programmers fault, or are users
directly typing this in?
Either can probably re-trained, perhaps you should do like google, and
drop
t Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:47 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
>
> the patch won't especially help queries like this. maybe they will be
> 5 or 6 times faster, but still slow.
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
the patch won't especially help queries like this. maybe they will be
5 or 6 times faster, but still slow.
if you really want to do such queries, consider this: do you really
need * to match an INFINITE amount of characters?!?!
I
t. I hope this
> will suit my needs. Something like screenName:*poker*
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:00 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which ve
fast. I hope this
will suit my needs. Something like screenName:*poker*
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:00 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version
Hi Sriram,
This patch
-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor [mailto:srir...@ivycomptech.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:05 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Applying LUCENE-1606 -
Hi:
I am trying to apply this Automata patch on my Lucene 3.0 src code but
running into issues as it is complaining about failures to apply patch
to certain files. Is this the right version
To apply to. Please help
Thanks
Sriram C
LUCENE-1606
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
caused by this.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: R.A.Ittoo [mailto:r.a.it...@rug.nl]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:38 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: which version
hi
i am us
2009 11:38 AM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: which version
>>
>> hi
>> i am using lucene version 2.9
>> When calling the StandardAnalyzer constructor with the
>> VErsion.LUCENE_VERSION as parameter, I get the error
>> "symbol not f
r.a.it...@rug.nl]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:38 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: which version
>
> hi
> i am using lucene version 2.9
> When calling the StandardAnalyzer constructor with the
> VErsion.LUCENE_VERSION as parameter, I get the error
&
hi
i am using lucene version 2.9
When calling the StandardAnalyzer constructor with the
VErsion.LUCENE_VERSION as parameter, I get the error
"symbol not found constructor
StandardAnalyzer(org.apache.lucene.util.Version)"
this is strange, as it is supposed to be correct according to the API
doc an
We try very hard to keep Lucene's trunk usable, but, sneaky things do
slip in from time to time so you certainly have to do your own
testing. And if you hit problems, be sure to raise them!
Which exact JRE version are you using? It could be you are hitting
the Sun JRE bug described here
in the past, I made really good experiences with the svn versions of lucene -
I never had problems, and everything feeled stable.
Currently, I get unexpected exceptions from time to time:
java.lang.RuntimeException: after flush: fdx size mismatch: 1 docs vs 0 length
in bytes of _3g6n.fdx
19 matches
Mail list logo
