N_QUERY_REWRITE);
Query prefixQuery = queryParser.parse("t*");
indexSearcher.search(prefixQuery, collector);
MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_REWRITE will populate terms into
BooleanQuery(default 1024? to hit TooManyClauses exception), you can set a
big enough one by calling BooleanQu
t;
> I know this is a perennial question here because I've spent a lot of time
> searching for an answer. I've seen the discussions about the TooManyClauses
> exception and I understand generally why you get the it. I see lots of
> discussion about using filters to avoid it but I
rote:
> Hello,
>
> I know this is a perennial question here because I've spent a lot of time
> searching for an answer. I've seen the discussions about the TooManyClauses
> exception and I understand generally why you get the it. I see lots of
> discussion about using
Hello,
I know this is a perennial question here because I've spent a lot of time
searching for an answer. I've seen the discussions about the TooManyClauses
exception and I understand generally why you get the it. I see lots of
discussion about using filters to avoid it but I still
gt; -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:arunk...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:41 PM
> > To: java-
> -Original Message-
> From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:arunk...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:41 PM
> To: java-user
> Subject: WildCardQuery: TooManyClauses Exception
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am using following queries:
> 1>WildCardQuery
> 2>BooleanQue
Hi Guys,
I am using following queries:
1>WildCardQuery
2>BooleanQuery having a WildCardQuery and TermQuery.
WildCardQuery is field:* or say field:ab*
>From Lucene FAQs and earlier discussions about TooManyClausesException i
see that WildCardQuery gets expanded before doing search.
For that i was
Hardy:
Since your use-case is so restricted, I'd recommend that you
just construct a filter. I think you'll find it's much faster than
you'd think at first glance. Of course, "Your mileage may
vary" Is there any equivalent phrase like "Your kilometerage
may vary" ?
Most of the discussion in the a
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:12:26 +0100, Erick Erickson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your help.
I'm certainly not an expert on ranking and scoring, but I've got to
assume that this approach influences scoring.
No doubt. The question is if it matters for this particular use case. For
th
many clauses" error and
responding with a message of "your search is too broad to
be useful" is reasonable.
Best
Erick
On Nov 12, 2007 4:44 PM, Hardy Ferentschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the way I got around the 'TooManyClaus
Hi,
I have a question regarding the way I got around the 'TooManyClauses'
exception when using wild card queries
(http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-06fafb5d19e786a50fb3dfb8821a6af9f37aa831).
I am using Lucene in conjunction with Hibernate Search
(http://www.hib
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 16:53, Erick Erickson wrote:
...
> 3> Look over the SrndQuery classes. I don't fully understand these, but they
> certainly behave much differently in this area. Note that SrndQuery limits
> wildcards to having at least three non-wildcard characters.
In Lucene, the li
1024, you see a TooManyClauses exception. Expanding the number of clauses
*may* fix you right up, but on any reasonably sized index, you can come up
with a query that'll exceed whatever number you set. Or you'll get to an
unacceptable performance/memory footprint. Imagine your query w
Chris,
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 15:42, Chris Salem wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm getting a 'TooManyClauses' Exception and I'm not sure how to fix this.
Here's a sample query that I'm using:
>
> +(+freeform_text:exhibit* +(+freeform_text:dispaly
Hi All,
I'm getting a 'TooManyClauses' Exception and I'm not sure how to fix this.
Here's a sample query that I'm using:
+(+freeform_text:exhibit* +(+freeform_text:dispaly +freeform_text:event*)
+(+freeform_text:sale* +freeform_text:sells +freeform_text:dev
On Mar 17, 2006, at 6:15 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the explanation. Given that RangeQuery is
clearly
unsuitable for out requirements, ConstantScoreRangeQuery looks ideal.
However, we're building our queries (at the moment) using QueryParser.
I
ad of a RangeQuery?
Cheers,
Tim.
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2006 18:04
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: TooManyClauses exception in Lucene (1.4)
On 3/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ha
Thanks very much for your reply, I appreciate you taking the time.
Erick
Hi,
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The primary advantage of a RangeQuery is that the ranking
> incorporates the degree of match of each term in the range,
> which may be useful for wildcard-like searches but is useless
> for date-like searches.
Also, RangeQuery allows to
Erick Erickson wrote:
Could you point me to any explanation of *why* range queries expand this
way?
It's just what they do. They were contributed a long time ago, before
things like RangeFilter or ConstantScoreRangeQuery were written. The
latter are relatively recent additions to Lucene and
When I read LIA, I was struck by this issue, and it seemed...er...like an
easy mistake to make. Given that my impression of Lucene is that it's
extraordinarily well designed, I assume that there must be a good reason for
expanding range queries this way.
Could you point me to any explanation of *w
On 3/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had no idea that rangequery worked by enumerating every
> possible value, that's terrifying.
You could use either a RangeFilter or a ConstantScoreRangeQuery
-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, The Open Source Lucene Search Ser
ery
for "2005-01-" to catch an entire month in one query, etc?
Cheers,
Tim.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2006 17:26
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: TooManyClauses exception in Lucene (1.4)
Tim,
This is possi
ay, March 16, 2006 11:34:29 AM
Subject: TooManyClauses exception in Lucene (1.4)
Hi,
We're using queryparser to generate my queries (not ideal, and we're
planning on rewriting it, but at the moment we don't have the resources
to do so).
We have a default field "text" wh
Hi,
We're using queryparser to generate my queries (not ideal, and we're
planning on rewriting it, but at the moment we don't have the resources
to do so).
We have a default field "text" which contains all of our text fields,
and a "date" field which is just a string field in the format -MM-
Thanks for the link.
I had overlooked the fact that RangeQuery expands to a sequence of term
queries and throws an exception when 1024 is reached.
By setting the BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount() to the required value, I was
able to avoid the TooManyClauses exception. But, as mentioned in the
t;
> I'm getting a TooManyClauses Exception when I try to query for a particular
> date range.
>
> I've around 4 million documents with 21 fields each.
>
> The fields to search into are determined by the user - it can be field F1 or
> F2 or both.
>
> Also the
On Thursday 19 May 2005 14:39, Jayakumar.V wrote:
> I'm getting a TooManyClauses Exception when I try to query for a
> particular date range.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-06fafb5d19e786a50fb3dfb8821a6af9f37aa831
--
http://www.dan
lean Query - TooManyClauses Exception
Hi,
I'm getting a TooManyClauses Exception when I try to query for a particular
date range.
I've around 4 million documents with 21 fields each.
The fields to search into are determined by the user - it can be field F1 or
F2 or both.
Also there is
Hi,
I'm getting a TooManyClauses Exception when I try to query for a particular
date range.
I've around 4 million documents with 21 fields each.
The fields to search into are determined by the user - it can be field F1 or
F2 or both.
Also there is a date range within which the re
30 matches
Mail list logo