First, if you don't need to distinguish between posts and comments,
you don't care about the increment gap. But if you do...
It's kind of arcane, but here's the general idea. You override your Analyzer
of choice and implement getPositionIncrementGap. Say your
getPositionIncrementGap
returns 100. W
@Erick, you are right i will have to stop thinking in terms of databases,
thats why i wanted to discuss this.
i don't get how can i use getPositionIncrementGap, could you provide little
more details.
thanks,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Ya just gotta stop thinking li
Ya just gotta stop thinking like a database guy, man . Lucene searches
lots and lots of text very well. It doesn't do joins worth a darn. The
moment
you star thinking in terms of sub-queries, you're probably starting down the
wrong track.
Here's a possibility. Index each post and all associated co
or in which you can collect the results and display the top-10 or
all unique posts.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath N. Rao
-Original Message-
From: Shahid Faiz [mailto:developer.in...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 7:06 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solution for p
Hi,
Following are details of my problem and possible solutions which I can think
of. Please suggest which should I choose, or is there any other approach
better than these.
I want to index blog posts and their comments, in my database posts and
comments are stored in two different tables. Current
