Done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5749
On 2014/06/10, 1:18 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Please do file a Jira. I'm sure the discussion will be interesting.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-
Please do file a Jira. I'm sure the discussion will be interesting.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jamie
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 9:33 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: searching with stemming
Jack
Thanks. I figured as much.
I'm modifying eac
to file a Jira suggesting your suggested improvement.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Jamie
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:56 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: searching with stemming
To me, it seems strange that these default analyzers, don't provide
construc
mprovement.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jamie
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:56 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: searching with stemming
To me, it seems strange that these default analyzers, don't provide
constructors that enable one to override stemming, e
Benson. Thanks. I was just hoping to avoid a whole bunch of boilerplate.
On 2014/06/09, 1:07 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Analyzer classes are optional; an analyzer is just a factory for a set of
token stream components. you can usually do just fine with an anonymous
class. Or in your case, the o
Analyzer classes are optional; an analyzer is just a factory for a set of
token stream components. you can usually do just fine with an anonymous
class. Or in your case, the only thing different for each language will be
the stop words, so you can have one analyzer class with a language
parameter.
I am not using Solr. I am using the default analyzers...
On 2014/06/09, 12:59 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Are you using Solr? If so you are on the wrong mailing list. If not, why do
you need a non-
-anonymous analyzer at all.
On Jun 9, 2014 6:55 AM, "Jamie" wrote:
To me, it seems strange that
Are you using Solr? If so you are on the wrong mailing list. If not, why do
you need a non-
-anonymous analyzer at all.
On Jun 9, 2014 6:55 AM, "Jamie" wrote:
> To me, it seems strange that these default analyzers, don't provide
> constructors that enable one to override stemming, etc?
>
> On 201
To me, it seems strange that these default analyzers, don't provide
constructors that enable one to override stemming, etc?
On 2014/06/09, 12:39 PM, Trejkaz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Jamie wrote:
Greetings
Our app currently uses language specific analysers (e.g. EnglishAnalyzer,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Jamie wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Our app currently uses language specific analysers (e.g. EnglishAnalyzer,
> GermanAnalyzer, etc.). We need an option to disable stemming. What's the
> recommended way to do this? These analyzers do not include an option to
> disable stem
Benson
Yes, I can of course do this, as far I can see I would have to override
each analyzer. This is a pain.
Regards
Jamie
On 2014/06/09, 12:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
You should construct an analysis chain that does what you need. Read the
source of the relevant analyzer and pick the to
You should construct an analysis chain that does what you need. Read the
source of the relevant analyzer and pick the tokenizer and filter(s) that
you need, and don't include stemming.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Jamie wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Our app currently uses language specific analyser
Greetings
Our app currently uses language specific analysers (e.g.
EnglishAnalyzer, GermanAnalyzer, etc.). We need an option to disable
stemming. What's the recommended way to do this? These analyzers do not
include an option to disable stemming, only a parameter to specify a
list words for w
13 matches
Mail list logo
