On Sep 26, 2005, at 3:10 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
I used my bug votes already. I hope more people will do that, hint:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=12310110
Is there a way to view the open issues sorted by number of votes?
There is the "Popular Issues" view:
<
Otis,
On Monday 26 September 2005 00:37, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> As Erik Hatcher noted in another email (it might have been on the -dev
> list), we'll go through JIRA before making the next release and try to
> push the patches like this one into the core. Personally, it has been
I used my bug
OTECTED]
> > Sent: 21 September 2005 19:16
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: search performance enhancement
> >
> > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote:
> > > Hi Paul and other gurus:
> > >
> > > In a r
September 2005 19:16
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: search performance enhancement
>
> On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote:
> > Hi Paul and other gurus:
> >
> > In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that wou
:16
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search performance enhancement
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote:
> Hi Paul and other gurus:
>
> In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit
in a
> "prohibited" boolean clause, e.
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 03:29, John Wang wrote:
> Hi Paul and other gurus:
>
> In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit in a
> "prohibited" boolean clause, e.g. NOT field:value. It doesn't seem to make
> sense to score a document that is to be excluded from the
Hi Paul and other gurus:
In a related topic, seems lucene is scoring documents that would hit in a
"prohibited" boolean clause, e.g. NOT field:value. It doesn't seem to make
sense to score a document that is to be excluded from the result. Is this a
difficult thing to fix?
Also in Paul's ealie
On Friday 19 August 2005 18:09, John Wang wrote:
> Hi Paul:
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
>How would I extend from the patch you submitted to filter out
> more documents not using a Filter. e.g.
>
> have a class to skip documents based on a docID: boolean
> isValid(int docID)
Hi Paul:
Thanks for the pointer.
How would I extend from the patch you submitted to filter out
more documents not using a Filter. e.g.
have a class to skip documents based on a docID: boolean
isValid(int docID)
My problem is I want to discard documents at query time wit
Hi John,
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 04:46, John Wang wrote:
> Hi:
>
>I posted a bug (36147) a few days ago and didn't hear anything, so
> I thought I'd try my luck on this list.
>
>The idea is to avoid score calculations on documents to be filtered
> out anyway. (e.g. via Filter object
Hi:
I posted a bug (36147) a few days ago and didn't hear anything, so
I thought I'd try my luck on this list.
The idea is to avoid score calculations on documents to be filtered
out anyway. (e.g. via Filter object passed to the searcher class)
This seems to be an easy change.
Also
11 matches
Mail list logo
