kiwi clive [kiwi_cl...@yahoo.com]:
> Thanks very much for the reply. I see there is not a quick win here but as
> we are going through an index consolidation process, it may pay to make
> the leap to 4.3 and put in facetting while I'm in there. We will get facetting
> slowly through the back door w
he time to explain the situation.
>
> Clive
>
>
>
>
> From: Shai Erera
> To: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" ; kiwi
> clive
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 5:56 AM
> Subject: Re: search-time facetting in Lucene
>
>
> Hi Clive,
>
&
i clive
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: search-time facetting in Lucene
Hi Clive,
In order to use Lucene facets you need to make indexing time decisions.
It's not that you don't make these decisions anyway, even with Solr -- for
example, you need to decide how to tokeniz
Hi Clive,
In order to use Lucene facets you need to make indexing time decisions.
It's not that you don't make these decisions anyway, even with Solr -- for
example, you need to decide how to tokenize the fields by which you want to
facet, or in Lucene 4.0 index them as SortedSetDocValuesField.
I
Hello all
Lucene version 3.6.1.
Sorry if this is a really stupid question, but is it possible to use
search-time facetting on an existing lucene index without the need to reindex?
My (limited) understanding is that FacetsCollector will pull facet data from
indexes that have been created with