ptimizing the index just after merging it, no matter if I use the lucene
> 3.X addIndexes or addIndexesNoOptimize as the sum of time of doing both
> things will be the same in one case or other. Am I right?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
ssage in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-merging-indexes-with-addIndexesNoOptimize-tp1889378p1890595.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java
dex using compound file (the merged one). If i do:
> w.optimze() ;
> w.close (false) ;
> Would I be getting any benefit if the w.close (false) ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://luce
e (false) ;
Would I be getting any benefit if the w.close (false) ?
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-merging-indexes-with-addIndexesNoOptimize-tp1889378p1890077.html
Sent from t
into 6... till geting
> a single big index. Could this be faster?
>
> Does anyone have experience with this? Any advice?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-merging-indexes-with-addIndexesNoOptimize-tp18893
uld this be faster?
Does anyone have experience with this? Any advice?
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-merging-indexes-with-addIndexesNoOptimize-tp1889378p1889378.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive
